Final Words

The Galaxy Note5 is a bit of a break in form for Samsung, but in some ways it represents a return to form. To understand what this means, we can look at the various aspects that make up the Galaxy Note5 in contrast to the Galaxy S6. One of the easier places to start is the design, which shares a great deal in common with the Galaxy S6. We see a similar reflective coating under the glass, a glass back cover, an aluminum midframe, and the usual home button and thin bezels. The fingerprint scanner in the home button works about as well as you would expect and is comparable to the Galaxy S6.

The next aspect of the phone worth looking at is battery life. Here, we see that the Note5 gets a healthy bump in battery life relative to the Galaxy S6. Relative to the Note 4, battery life is basically comparable and not all that different. It seems that Samsung’s theme this year is maintaining battery life by reducing battery size and improving power efficiency. Those looking for a removable battery might be disappointed, but if you never swapped the battery in a phone like the Galaxy Note 4 there’s nothing to really worry about here. Samsung has also retained fast charging capabilities, so it isn’t nearly as important to swap batteries.

The display of the Galaxy Note5 continues to be incredible. Out of all the Android OEMs right now, Samsung is the best at display. I’m still of the opinion that the best LCDs are comparable with Samsung’s latest AMOLED panels, but within the next year or two I’m fairly confident that they won’t have any competition here. However, given the lack of second source suppliers it seems unlikely that OEMs will move en masse to OLED as strongly relying on a single supplier for any critical part of a product could easily be a disastrous mistake. The Galaxy S6 edge+ has a similar level of display quality, but the edges of the display are clearly distorted to the eye due to the subpixel arrangement used.

The SoC used continues to be the best SoC you can get in any mobile device running Android. This is likely to change next year, but given the data it’s incontrovertible that the Exynos 7420 is the fastest and most efficient SoC available in an Android device. These two factors strongly affect user experience in workloads like web browsing, updating and installing apps, and gaming. If you do any of those three things, SoC performance has a strong influence upon overall user experience for you. NAND quality isn’t quite at the same level as the Galaxy S6, but it’s more than sufficient and is unlikely to be a problem for the duration of a two year contract.

Overall, the software experience is actually quite acceptable. TouchWiz has gotten a lot better in the past generation, and any time I pick up a Galaxy S3 or Galaxy S4 I’m immediately reminded of this. However, as mentioned in the Galaxy S6 review I don’t think it’s necessarily perfect. The smoothness of the UI isn’t as amazing as some of the phones I’ve used in the past, and there are sometimes odd choices in application design like icon design. Using a Material Design theme from the theme store goes a long way to dealing with this problem, but that’s no excuse for the default theme. The Note features are useful and the single biggest reason to buy the Galaxy Note5 over another phablet, but the edge features are decidedly impractical and generally not very useful. I still think it's possible to make a better skin than TouchWiz, but I can live with TouchWiz on a primary phone.

In the camera department, on the surface nothing has changed relative to the Galaxy S6. Even if Samsung didn’t do anything for the Galaxy Note5’s camera relative to the Galaxy S6, it would still be one of the best Android cameras you can get today. However, Samsung has included a number of new features like RAW capture and improved manual mode controls. In addition, they’ve dramatically improved low light photo processing to the point that I’m confident in saying that the Galaxy Note5 beats the LG G4 and iPhone 6 Plus, but in video performance the iPhone 6 Plus is still slightly better. The Galaxy Note5 is either as good as or better than the iPhone 6 Plus for overall camera quality depending upon how strongly you want to weight video recording.

Outside of these main areas of focus, overall I like the the Galaxy Note5. In chosing to mimic the Galaxy S6 so closely it's not a bold design for Samsung and you won't find much in the way of new features, but instead what you get is in many ways a big Galaxy S6. Often because of that it's not a perfect phone - Samsung could still afford to work on polish, particularly in regards to issues like inserting the stylus backwards or RAW files that aren’t deleted - however it also does a lot well like the 5.7" SAMOLED display, the camera, and the Exynos 7420 SoC.

If you’re looking for the best Android phablet on the market today the Galaxy Note5 or Galaxy S6 edge+ is likely to be your best bet. They may not be a big jump up from the Galaxy S6, but they're still the best Android phablets you can get today. In that sense, Samsung is departing from the sort of strategy that we saw with the Galaxy Note 3 and 4 in the form of a new SoC and other improvements that came with the Note line, but like the Galaxy Note 1 and 2 these are phablet variants of their Galaxy S cousin.

Video Performance, WiFi Performance, and GNSS Performance
Comments Locked

225 Comments

View All Comments

  • ciderrules - Tuesday, October 6, 2015 - link

    Funny you picked the iPhone 6S and not the 6S Plus, which is a better comparison due to it having a larger screen and more "pixels to push".

    It scored 85 hours on their endurance rating, easily beating the GS6's 73 hours. Further, the 6S Plus beat last years 6 Plus even with a smaller battery. GS6 actually had less battery life than the GS5.

    So Apple gives you the most powerful processor on the planet, decreases the battery size by 8%, and manages to increase battery life.
  • Kuzi - Tuesday, October 6, 2015 - link

    iPhone 6s Plus is a phablet the same size of the Note 5, so should be compared with the Note 5 which gets the same rating of 85 too, but is pushing 1.7 times more pixels while offering faster multithreaded performance.
  • ciderrules - Tuesday, October 6, 2015 - link

    No, it's not faster. I already explained this to you before and you're still coming back and posting incorrect information again?

    Primate Labs (makers of Geekbench) rates the Note5 at 4351, the iPhone 6S/6S Plus at 4330/4331. So yes, the Note5 is a fraction of a percent faster in multi core performance.
  • Kuzi - Wednesday, October 7, 2015 - link

    How many times do I have to explain that I own a Galaxy S6 and I get +5200 on Geekbench multicore test. I also own an Xperia Z4 tablet (SD 810 based) that gets +4800. So both are faster than A9 in multicore.

    Also GSMArena & Phonearena get similar results for exynos 7420 based devices as per below:
    http://www.gsmarena.com/samsung_galaxy_note5-revie...

    http://www.phonearena.com/news/Our-Samsung-Galaxy-...

    There is some variance with each test run, and if the phone is warmer it gets slightly lower results. In my case the lowest I got was 5000 for GS6.
  • thedons1983 - Sunday, October 18, 2015 - link

    What a fucki#g moron. You are pathetic!!
  • coburn_c - Sunday, October 4, 2015 - link

    Both curves of the plus have a disgusting green hue to them, and when you tilt it until one disappears, the entire front gets the baby poo greens. It is easily the worst viewing angle on any modern phone, and on an AMOLED of all places, a technology known for its viewing angles. I can't imagine how they could have screwed up worse.
  • thedons1983 - Sunday, October 18, 2015 - link

    Then you lack imagination... Apple has already made a worse phone for starters, or are you so ignorant, that you can't tell the difference between apples and oranges????
  • theduckofdeath - Monday, October 5, 2015 - link

    I wonder why Anandtech still had one standard for Samsung and one standard for everybody else when it comes to displays? I don't see you people scrutinise and down rank ocular quality issues with LCD displays like to do with AMOLED. AMOLED haven't just caught up to LCD this year, it's been superior for years, Anandtech. Fix your flawed and biased tests.
  • Peichen - Monday, October 5, 2015 - link

    If AMOLED is anywhere close to IPS why aren't EIZO, NEC, Dell switching their professional lineup to AMOLED? Why are 31" calibrated IPS monitors going for $3000 while the same money can get you 55" 4K OLED TV? For that matter, how come no one is selling a calibrated OLED anything? With all the green/purple tint and grayish white you'd think OLED could use some calibration.

    Leave the review to the professionals. Your eyeballing review aren't worth the hot air carrying the sound bits.
  • Kamus - Tuesday, October 6, 2015 - link

    "The professionals" agree with him, go read displaymate's reviews.

Log in

Don't have an account? Sign up now