Battery Life

The first generation of the iPad promised a ten hour battery life, which was exceptional when one considers what the battery life of smartphones and laptops was at that time. Since that time the battery life target OEMs aim for with tablets has usually hovered around that 10 hour mark. Whether or not a tablet lasts that long obviously depends on a mixture of the user's workload and the OEM's honesty in the battery numbers they report. As for the ZenPad S Z580CA, its 15.2Wh battery is rated for up to 8 hours of battery life by ASUS, which is lower than I would expect when the iPad Mini 2 is competing at the same price with a 10 hour battery life. Of course, the ZenPad S is 0.9 thinner at its thinnest point, which leaves less room to put in battery. This may be one of the cases where I would agree that a thicker device with a larger battery would be better, but that will depend on the outcome of our battery tests.

As always, all devices are calibrated to 200nits for all battery benchmarks, and they follow the standard order of web browsing, BaseMark OS II, PCMark, and finally GFXBench 3.0.

Web Browsing Battery Life (WiFi)

In our WiFi web test the ZenPad S falls about 43 minutes short of its rated 8 hour battery life. Had it been designed for a 10 hour rating this wouldn't be a huge deal as you'd still be talking about nearly 9.2 hours of battery life. However, 7.18 hours is a relatively short battery life for web browsing when you consider that the iPad Mini 2 lasts 9.83 hours in the same test, while the Dell Venue 8 7840 lasts 9.59 hours with the same SoC and a similar display area.

BaseMark OS II Battery Score

BaseMark OS II Battery Life

The ZenPad S does fairly well in BaseMark OS II's battery benchmark which mainly stresses a device's CPU. However, it's again outclassed by the Dell Venue 8 7840 which uses the same SoC and actually has a thinner chassis. In this case I would say that the ZenPad S doesn't have bad battery life at all, but I do wish it was a bit higher than it is.

PCMark - Work Battery Life

The ZenPad S achieves the shortest battery life of our tested devices in PCMark's battery life test. Although both devices are close, its battery life is slightly shorter than that of the Dell Venue 10 7040, which I repeatedly noted as having extremely poor battery life. PCMark is a fairly good example of the battery life that a user can expected from a mixed workload, and the ZenPad S Z580CA's battery life of 5.33 hours is not quite where it needs to be.

GFXBench 3.0 Performance Degradation

GFXBench 3.0 Battery Life

The ZenPad S doesn't last quite as long as the iPad Air 2 in GFXBench's battery test, and sits a little more than 46 minutes behind the Dell Venue 8 7840. Evaluating how well a device does in GFXBench requires considering both the battery life as well as the performance. A device can last a long time but deliver performance that isn't even remotely playable. Conversely, a device can last a short time but have incredible performance, which would still be preferable to a long period of unplayable performance.

With a steady frame rate slightly above 19 FPS for most of the test, the ZenPad S doesn't quite offer smooth performance during the 3.69 hours that it ran for. In comparison, Apple's iPad Air 2 lasted longer and approaches upon 50 FPS, which is well above the 30 FPS that many 3D mobile games target. However, it's also worth noting that this is an on-screen test, and in games that render below a device's native resolution it's entirely possible that the ZenPad S would deliver smooth performance while maintaining its 3.69 hours of battery life. It's also worth noting that the iPad Air 2 costs significantly more than the ZenPad, and while we don't have information about the iPad Mini 2 in this test, it's very likely that its performance would be similar. In the end, the PowerVR G6430 GPU is still a fairly capable GPU, even if it can't run intensive 3D games at 2048x1536. I think the GPU performance and battery life in GPU heavy loads that the ZenPad S offers is more than acceptable for a $300 device.

Charge Time

Since tablets have significantly larger batteries than smartphones, they have always required high power chargers to recharge their batteries in an acceptable period of time. Even so, devices like the 2012 iPad took as long as six hours to charge even with a 10W charger due to the sheer size of their battery. Thankfully, reductions in platform power have allowed for smaller batteries while maintaining battery life, which leads to shorter charging times for tablets. At the moment, most tablets seem to take between 3.5 and 4 hours to charge, and with its 15.2Wh battery one would hope that the ZenPad S could go below that 3.5 hour figure. As you can see above, the ZenPad S doesn't quite meet that goal.

Charge Time

The ZenPad 2 charges slightly quicker than other tablets like the iPad Air 2, iPad Mini 2, Nexus 9, and the Galaxy Tab S 8.4. However, it doesn't charge as fast as the Dell Venue 8 7840. To be honest, I had expected a better result here because of the ZenPad's relatively tiny battery capacity. Dell's included charger provides 7W of power, which isn't as much as the 10W+ bricks that come with iPads and some other tablets. It's worth noting that I also checked the charge time when using ASUS's 18W QC 2.0 power brick, but measured no difference from the one that comes in the box. I would like to note that the lack of QC 2.0 support has absolutely nothing to do with the use of the USB Type-C connector. The USB connector is unrelated to the data and power protocols.

In the end users won't be getting a significant shorter or longer charge time than other tablets, but knowing that the battery is only 15.2Wh has me feeling a bit let down that the ZenPad S takes as long as it does to charge.

Camera and WiFi Final Words
Comments Locked

114 Comments

View All Comments

  • kmmatney - Monday, August 31, 2015 - link

    Having both a 16:9 windows tablet and an iPad, IMO 4:3 is better. Who plays "immersive" games on there tablet? - that's what a computer or laptop is for. For typical things you use a tablet for - web browsing, reading emails, reading books, you tube, various other consumption, the 4:3 aspect ratio is perfect. I don't pretend to do any serious work on my tablets, but I wish my windows tablet was 4:3. There is a reason why the MS Surface tablets no longer use a 16:9 aspect ratio.
  • boeush - Monday, August 31, 2015 - link

    This is getting pretty stupid... Let's say your tablet is x inches long. Does it really make that much difference whether it's height gives 19:10 ot 4:3 AR? Unlike a phone, you aren't about to shove that tablet into a pocket. So is it REALLY so TERRIBLE that you have extra vertical screen space when watching a movie in landscape? Yeah, instead of that extra screen you could just have empty space I guess - but that still won't make your tablet all that more compact anyway (with the horizontal dimension being dominant.) So boo-hoo, you get top and bottom sidebars on your video. Contrast that with the use cases where you need/want that extra height in your landscape mode, or the extra width in portrait - and DON'T HAVE IT because your tablet is built oblong and that's that. Seriously, I for one would rather have extra screen space I don't need under certain circumstances, rather than at other times needing the extra space and not having it!
  • keltypack - Monday, August 31, 2015 - link

    I totally agree with the 4:3 aspect ratio. I don't know what people are thinking, but a tablet is a GREAT way to watch a movie on an airplane. The 16:9 ratio is much better for reading books. I don't understand the Apple fascination with 4:3. To be fair, I think 3:2 is a better aspect ratio than 16:9, but maybe that is the old-school photographer in me.
  • uhuznaa - Monday, August 31, 2015 - link

    16:9 sucks for websites and more compley apps though, both in portrait (too narrow) and in landscape (with some toolbars around you see only a small sliver and when typing into a form there's hardly any content left).

    But yes, if you're mainly watching movies with your tablet, 16:9 is better.
  • sonny73n - Tuesday, September 1, 2015 - link

    The only reason 16:9 is better for movies because all HD contents are in 16:9. But to me, 16:9 is just odd and stupid. I remember when the first wave of HDTV hit the market, there was a widescreen trend. So bad they even started making movies wider than 16:9 - something really odd like 1920x818 instead of the 1920x1080.

    16:9 is horrible even on phones. Keyboard in landscape mode blocks more than 50% of the screen. You can have a 4.7in 1280x768 screen looks as big as a 5in 1280x720. 16:9 sucks, movies too. I'd rather see movies in 2:3 format.
  • BurntMyBacon - Wednesday, September 2, 2015 - link

    @sonny73n: 16:10 more accurately maps to the active area of the human visual system and thus gives a more immersive experience at the appropriate screen size / viewing distance. 16:9 was just cost cutting measure by reducing the probability of defects in a screen given the statistical probability of localization. Problem is, you can't interact with your tablet when it's in your face. Most people don't sit that close to a TV either. Usability on 16:9 isn't very good. It is better at 16:10, but 4:3 or 3:2 can make more sense in a lot of cases. I personally prefer 16:10 (1280x800 in your example above), but a lot of that depends on how the tools you use are laid out.
  • R. Hunt - Tuesday, September 1, 2015 - link

    Apps look so much more natural in 4:3 IMO. Web browsing, and PDF reading are also better. I think, specially for large tablets, a squarer aspect ratio is overall the better choice. My Tab Pro 10.1 looks and feels really awkward in portrait (and unnecessarily long). I'll be getting the Tab S2 soon, no doubt.
  • BurntMyBacon - Wednesday, September 2, 2015 - link

    @keltypack: Yes. Your 3:2 preference is the old school photographer in you. Nothin wrong with that.
  • retrospooty - Monday, August 31, 2015 - link

    jjj, I think you need to put the pipe down.
  • Puck85 - Thursday, September 10, 2015 - link

    serious question: what should I buy instead of this around this price range?

Log in

Don't have an account? Sign up now