Battery Life

The first generation of the iPad promised a ten hour battery life, which was exceptional when one considers what the battery life of smartphones and laptops was at that time. Since that time the battery life target OEMs aim for with tablets has usually hovered around that 10 hour mark. Whether or not a tablet lasts that long obviously depends on a mixture of the user's workload and the OEM's honesty in the battery numbers they report. As for the ZenPad S Z580CA, its 15.2Wh battery is rated for up to 8 hours of battery life by ASUS, which is lower than I would expect when the iPad Mini 2 is competing at the same price with a 10 hour battery life. Of course, the ZenPad S is 0.9 thinner at its thinnest point, which leaves less room to put in battery. This may be one of the cases where I would agree that a thicker device with a larger battery would be better, but that will depend on the outcome of our battery tests.

As always, all devices are calibrated to 200nits for all battery benchmarks, and they follow the standard order of web browsing, BaseMark OS II, PCMark, and finally GFXBench 3.0.

Web Browsing Battery Life (WiFi)

In our WiFi web test the ZenPad S falls about 43 minutes short of its rated 8 hour battery life. Had it been designed for a 10 hour rating this wouldn't be a huge deal as you'd still be talking about nearly 9.2 hours of battery life. However, 7.18 hours is a relatively short battery life for web browsing when you consider that the iPad Mini 2 lasts 9.83 hours in the same test, while the Dell Venue 8 7840 lasts 9.59 hours with the same SoC and a similar display area.

BaseMark OS II Battery Score

BaseMark OS II Battery Life

The ZenPad S does fairly well in BaseMark OS II's battery benchmark which mainly stresses a device's CPU. However, it's again outclassed by the Dell Venue 8 7840 which uses the same SoC and actually has a thinner chassis. In this case I would say that the ZenPad S doesn't have bad battery life at all, but I do wish it was a bit higher than it is.

PCMark - Work Battery Life

The ZenPad S achieves the shortest battery life of our tested devices in PCMark's battery life test. Although both devices are close, its battery life is slightly shorter than that of the Dell Venue 10 7040, which I repeatedly noted as having extremely poor battery life. PCMark is a fairly good example of the battery life that a user can expected from a mixed workload, and the ZenPad S Z580CA's battery life of 5.33 hours is not quite where it needs to be.

GFXBench 3.0 Performance Degradation

GFXBench 3.0 Battery Life

The ZenPad S doesn't last quite as long as the iPad Air 2 in GFXBench's battery test, and sits a little more than 46 minutes behind the Dell Venue 8 7840. Evaluating how well a device does in GFXBench requires considering both the battery life as well as the performance. A device can last a long time but deliver performance that isn't even remotely playable. Conversely, a device can last a short time but have incredible performance, which would still be preferable to a long period of unplayable performance.

With a steady frame rate slightly above 19 FPS for most of the test, the ZenPad S doesn't quite offer smooth performance during the 3.69 hours that it ran for. In comparison, Apple's iPad Air 2 lasted longer and approaches upon 50 FPS, which is well above the 30 FPS that many 3D mobile games target. However, it's also worth noting that this is an on-screen test, and in games that render below a device's native resolution it's entirely possible that the ZenPad S would deliver smooth performance while maintaining its 3.69 hours of battery life. It's also worth noting that the iPad Air 2 costs significantly more than the ZenPad, and while we don't have information about the iPad Mini 2 in this test, it's very likely that its performance would be similar. In the end, the PowerVR G6430 GPU is still a fairly capable GPU, even if it can't run intensive 3D games at 2048x1536. I think the GPU performance and battery life in GPU heavy loads that the ZenPad S offers is more than acceptable for a $300 device.

Charge Time

Since tablets have significantly larger batteries than smartphones, they have always required high power chargers to recharge their batteries in an acceptable period of time. Even so, devices like the 2012 iPad took as long as six hours to charge even with a 10W charger due to the sheer size of their battery. Thankfully, reductions in platform power have allowed for smaller batteries while maintaining battery life, which leads to shorter charging times for tablets. At the moment, most tablets seem to take between 3.5 and 4 hours to charge, and with its 15.2Wh battery one would hope that the ZenPad S could go below that 3.5 hour figure. As you can see above, the ZenPad S doesn't quite meet that goal.

Charge Time

The ZenPad 2 charges slightly quicker than other tablets like the iPad Air 2, iPad Mini 2, Nexus 9, and the Galaxy Tab S 8.4. However, it doesn't charge as fast as the Dell Venue 8 7840. To be honest, I had expected a better result here because of the ZenPad's relatively tiny battery capacity. Dell's included charger provides 7W of power, which isn't as much as the 10W+ bricks that come with iPads and some other tablets. It's worth noting that I also checked the charge time when using ASUS's 18W QC 2.0 power brick, but measured no difference from the one that comes in the box. I would like to note that the lack of QC 2.0 support has absolutely nothing to do with the use of the USB Type-C connector. The USB connector is unrelated to the data and power protocols.

In the end users won't be getting a significant shorter or longer charge time than other tablets, but knowing that the battery is only 15.2Wh has me feeling a bit let down that the ZenPad S takes as long as it does to charge.

Camera and WiFi Final Words
Comments Locked

114 Comments

View All Comments

  • PixyMisa - Monday, August 31, 2015 - link

    I have two Nexus 7 2013s (one died and wouldn't charge any more, but a wireless charging pad brought it back to life).

    Still holding on and waiting for something better that doesn't cost three arms and a leg.

    I also have an Xperia Z Ultra that I picked up cheap. That's not bad, but a little on the small side for tablet use.
  • Sunburn74 - Monday, August 31, 2015 - link

    Does Anandtech plan to update the review once a stylus is available? For some of us, the stylus input would be a real deal maker (or breaker if it is subpar).
  • Brandon Chester - Monday, August 31, 2015 - link

    I specifically asked ASUS to send the stylus and cover if they could, but all I got was the tablet. I have to send this back so I doubt I'll ever be able to look at the stylus. I really wanted to.
  • vladx - Monday, August 31, 2015 - link

    What nonsense is this about the camera? The day photo definitely looks the best along with S6 Edge one. Saying the iPad one looks better is a joke.

    The rumours are true, this site is more and more biased by each day passed.
  • Brandon Chester - Monday, August 31, 2015 - link

    I don't know if you viewed them at full size or not but ASUS's camera processing has been widely panned by pretty much every site that looked at the Zenfone 2, and it is literally unchanged here. If there's some level of bias there then it must exist at every tech site ever.

    The image quality is not even remotely comparable to the shot from the S6 Edge. A good area to examine is the walls of the school, they're completely destroyed by heavy noise reduction to the point where the lines start curving and shifting. It's just not a good image.
  • DanNeely - Tuesday, September 1, 2015 - link

    It's really that the problems are only obvious in the full size image. The resized images in the gallery aren't large enough to see the problems.

    This's a sitewide comment, and not directed at you personally; but people who look at the full size images as well as the ones in the gallery are probably in the minority. I think a set of 1:1 crops of a detail area or two that make things like the destructive processing the Asus does readily apparent would really make problems more apparent.
  • eek2121 - Tuesday, September 1, 2015 - link

    I didn't even finish reading the first page of this article and I thought to myself...ASUS made the nexus 7. Why the hate?
  • Michael REMY - Tuesday, September 1, 2015 - link

    as Anandtech still continue to ignore sony xperia tablet, i can not consider seriously this review of the asus zenpad. i trust all the review of Anandtech else the tablets ones! I hope one day you could try or review the xperia z3 compact tablet or even the xperia z4 tablet because it changes all the done and the way to judge the other tablets on the market.
  • DanNeely - Tuesday, September 1, 2015 - link

    It's not AT ignoring the Sony Tablet. It's Sony ignoring the tech press. AT (among others) have regularly asked for review samples of various products. Sony's almost never willing to provide them. As a result they get next to no press coverage beyond demos at big shows and product release announcements. That's entirely on them.
  • MrSavage - Tuesday, September 1, 2015 - link

    People running big websites aren't capable of buying a review unit off a store shelf? Imagine that. Having to pay for a review unit? Perhaps giving it away later as a giveaway contest? Nobody knows about tax write offs? Sure, if it's not free then we don't review it. If it's the best tablet on the market who cares. We won't inform our site visitors of that great product because there was no freebie sent out. Credibility wise, I would not be saying this is great or the best because I chose not to review other top tablets because I didn't get a free one in the mail to review. I wish sites were open about the bias or friendly handshake agreements. The best tablet of the free ones sent out to big websites. Not the best, but just the best from the ass kissing companies who sent out review units. Sad excuse in my books. I call it a disservice to my visitors if that's my mentality.

Log in

Don't have an account? Sign up now