Display: Altered White Point

ASUS’s ZenUI devices include an application called Splendid, which allows the user to select from a few different display settings or create their own. The controls are limited to a color temperature slider, a hue slider and a saturation slider. Because there’s absolutely no way for a normal user to check if the adjustments they are making are improving or reducing the display’s accuracy, I’ve refrained from adjusting the hue or saturation sliders. However, users can judge when adjustments to color temperature have made the rendition of grey shades less cold than the stock settings, and so I have adjusted the color temperature slider to be 3 positions from the right for the following tests.

As you can see above, adjusting the white balance allows the ZenPad’s greyscale accuracy to increase dramatically, and the display’s blue shift is essentially eliminated. The accuracy is now competitive with the iPad Mini 2, which is where it really should have been in the first place. Adjusting the color temperature to this setting does drop peak brightness by 8 nits or so, but it’s well worth it to improve the appearance of the display to this extent.

Before adjustment on the left, after on the right

Saturation accuracy improves from being less accurate than the iPad Mini 2 to being noticeably more accurate. There’s only so much that can be done by adjusting the display’s overall RGB balance, and I really wish the ZenPad S had better accuracy than this right out of the box, but it’s still a good improvement from the stock settings.

Before adjustment on the left, after on the right

In the GretagMacbeth ColorChecker test there’s a good improvement in the accuracy of color mixtures with the adjusted color temperature. Since the saturation accuracy is still imperfect, there’s inherent error to many of the color mixtures, but the error is to a much lesser degree than how the display looks without any adjustments.

In the end the ZenPad S has a better display than ASUS’s default settings would have you believe. Although the ZenPad S has a laminated display and a wider color gamut than the iPad Mini 2, based on the results of the ColorChecker test I would have to conclude that the iPad Mini 2’s display is superior overall. If you can adjust your ZenPad’s display you will still have a very sharp panel, and in the $199 model it’s definitely best in class. That being said, I think the $299 ZenPad S Z580CA should have aimed higher when it comes to color accuracy, as the two year old iPad Mini 2 still offers better reproduction of grey shades, colors, and offers roughly equivalent brightness and contrast.

A Word On ASUS VisualMaster/True2Life+

The ZenPad S Z580CA comes with a number of display "optimizations" which are similar to those you would find on televisions. I put optimization in quotes because while it is true that slight adjustments to brightness and gamma can help to maintain image quality in different ambient conditions, I have never in my entire life seen a single device where those optimizations are applied in a reasonable manner. The display oriented processing that ASUS performs is marketed as ASUS True2Life+ technology, and I wanted to go over a few aspects of it while also discussing the positive or negative impacts they had on my experience when using the ZenPad S.

Dynamic Brightness and Contrast

These features are often referred to as CABC, or Content Adaptive Backlight Control. ASUS advertises them as a measure to improve image quality, but in practice it's more useful as a tool to save power when applied in the right situations. Unfortunately, the ZenPad S goes overboard with its adaptive brightness, which was also an issue with the ZenFone 2. Because the ZenPad S has a much larger display, the shifting of brightness is far more obvious than on a phone. For example, when scrolling through the recent apps tray you will notice the brightness of the entire display going up and down depending on how light or dark the interface of the application currently in view is. Swiping open the quick toggles in the notification shade also changes the brightness of the display, as do many of the switches to and from applications. A tablet like the iPad Air 2 employs the use of CABC when watching videos, and even in that case I am still not a fan but I understand the purpose. Having significant brightness changes constantly occurring throughout every app and every part of the UI is not something I understand, and it's not something that I feel devices should use outside of something like a power saver mode or when the display APL is incredibly low.

Sharpening

This part of VisualMaster is fairly self explanatory. ASUS performs sharpening as a post-processing effect, and it applies to pretty much all content on the display to varying degrees. I have never seen this feature implemented in a way that is completely useful, and the ZenPad S is no exception. Like other devices that perform sharpening, like the LG G3, the only thing I notice is that text and any objects made of reasonably thin lines has a distracting halo effect. It seems contradictory to the idea of sharpening, but the effect actually reduces the sharpness of what you see on screen, and at times it can actually cause small text to be straining on the eyes. Considering the ZenPad S has a 326ppi display, I don't understand why there's any need for artificial sharpening. To my knowledge, there's no way to disable this feature, so it's something users will have to deal with unless ASUS issues an update with an option to disable it.

Blur-free Motion

The last significant aspect of VisualMaster/True2Life+ is ASUS's Blur-free motion tech. This is essentially the same as the frame interpolation that you see on televisions, which analyzes two frames and attempts to construct an intermediate frame that would go between the two. This feature is actually very successful in making videos appear to be a higher frame rate than they actually are, and it does help to eliminate blurring. I'm actually quite impressed that this can be done as a real-time processing effect on a performance-limited device like a tablet without significant artifacting or other issues. That being said, I fundamentally disagree with the entire concept. To be clear, I am not at all against filming or animating video content at a frame rate higher than 24fps. What I am against is the idea of trying to make content that was not produced at a high frame rate look as though it was. I've loaded as many different videos as possible onto the ZenPad S, and because I'm used to seeing all of them run at 24 or 30 frames per second they just look strange with ASUS's anti-blur processing and frame interpolation.

Unlike the display's heavy CABC, ASUS offers a setting to disable the anti-blur processing in the display section of the settings application. When I first received my review unit, this setting was actually broken which was a huge issue. A recently released firmware update which brings the tablet to V4.1.0 fixed this issue, which is a huge relief. I personally would recommend turning this feature off, but it's great that users are given the option of having it if they want it.

Final Words

Ultimately, I've never seen much appeal in the heavy post-processing that televisions can apply to content, and that hasn't changed with it being brought over to mobile. Most of my feelings toward VisualMaster and True2Life+ are negative, and I really wish there was an option to just turn all the processing off entirely.

Display Camera and WiFi
Comments Locked

114 Comments

View All Comments

  • PixyMisa - Monday, August 31, 2015 - link

    I have two Nexus 7 2013s (one died and wouldn't charge any more, but a wireless charging pad brought it back to life).

    Still holding on and waiting for something better that doesn't cost three arms and a leg.

    I also have an Xperia Z Ultra that I picked up cheap. That's not bad, but a little on the small side for tablet use.
  • Sunburn74 - Monday, August 31, 2015 - link

    Does Anandtech plan to update the review once a stylus is available? For some of us, the stylus input would be a real deal maker (or breaker if it is subpar).
  • Brandon Chester - Monday, August 31, 2015 - link

    I specifically asked ASUS to send the stylus and cover if they could, but all I got was the tablet. I have to send this back so I doubt I'll ever be able to look at the stylus. I really wanted to.
  • vladx - Monday, August 31, 2015 - link

    What nonsense is this about the camera? The day photo definitely looks the best along with S6 Edge one. Saying the iPad one looks better is a joke.

    The rumours are true, this site is more and more biased by each day passed.
  • Brandon Chester - Monday, August 31, 2015 - link

    I don't know if you viewed them at full size or not but ASUS's camera processing has been widely panned by pretty much every site that looked at the Zenfone 2, and it is literally unchanged here. If there's some level of bias there then it must exist at every tech site ever.

    The image quality is not even remotely comparable to the shot from the S6 Edge. A good area to examine is the walls of the school, they're completely destroyed by heavy noise reduction to the point where the lines start curving and shifting. It's just not a good image.
  • DanNeely - Tuesday, September 1, 2015 - link

    It's really that the problems are only obvious in the full size image. The resized images in the gallery aren't large enough to see the problems.

    This's a sitewide comment, and not directed at you personally; but people who look at the full size images as well as the ones in the gallery are probably in the minority. I think a set of 1:1 crops of a detail area or two that make things like the destructive processing the Asus does readily apparent would really make problems more apparent.
  • eek2121 - Tuesday, September 1, 2015 - link

    I didn't even finish reading the first page of this article and I thought to myself...ASUS made the nexus 7. Why the hate?
  • Michael REMY - Tuesday, September 1, 2015 - link

    as Anandtech still continue to ignore sony xperia tablet, i can not consider seriously this review of the asus zenpad. i trust all the review of Anandtech else the tablets ones! I hope one day you could try or review the xperia z3 compact tablet or even the xperia z4 tablet because it changes all the done and the way to judge the other tablets on the market.
  • DanNeely - Tuesday, September 1, 2015 - link

    It's not AT ignoring the Sony Tablet. It's Sony ignoring the tech press. AT (among others) have regularly asked for review samples of various products. Sony's almost never willing to provide them. As a result they get next to no press coverage beyond demos at big shows and product release announcements. That's entirely on them.
  • MrSavage - Tuesday, September 1, 2015 - link

    People running big websites aren't capable of buying a review unit off a store shelf? Imagine that. Having to pay for a review unit? Perhaps giving it away later as a giveaway contest? Nobody knows about tax write offs? Sure, if it's not free then we don't review it. If it's the best tablet on the market who cares. We won't inform our site visitors of that great product because there was no freebie sent out. Credibility wise, I would not be saying this is great or the best because I chose not to review other top tablets because I didn't get a free one in the mail to review. I wish sites were open about the bias or friendly handshake agreements. The best tablet of the free ones sent out to big websites. Not the best, but just the best from the ass kissing companies who sent out review units. Sad excuse in my books. I call it a disservice to my visitors if that's my mentality.

Log in

Don't have an account? Sign up now