As financial week rolls along this week, today AMD announced their second quarter 2015 financial results. Earlier this month ahead of today’s announcement the company issued a warning for their Q2 earnings, significantly revising down their projections for revenue and gross margin. As a result of AMD’s earlier warning today’s announcement doesn’t have too many surprises in it, but it’s none the less an important and unfortunately painful quarter for AMD.

AMD Q2 2015 Financial Results (GAAP)
  Q2'2015 Q1'2015 Q2'2014
Revenue $942M $1.03B $1.44B
Gross Margin 25% 32% 35%
Operating Income -$137M -$137M $63M
Net Income -$181M -$180M -$36M
Earnings Per Share -$0.23 -$0.23 -$0.05

For the quarter AMD recorded $942 million in revenue. This marks the first time in quite a number of years that AMD’s quarterly revenue has dipped below $1 billion, indicating the challenges the company has faced as the PC market continues to be soft and AMD CPU/APU sales have declined. All told the company’s revenue has dropped 8% compared to Q1, and on a year-over-year basis it has dropped 35%

Unsurprisingly given AMD’s low revenue, operating and net income for the quarter were both losses. On a GAAP basis operating income was a $137 million loss while the net loss was $181 million, both of which are virtually unchanged from AMD’s Q1’15 performance. Meanwhile on a non-GAAP basis the operating income loss was $87 million and the net loss $131 million, both of which were accelerated versus the last quarter. On a year-over-year basis both GAAP and non-GAAP show a significant increase in losses versus Q2’14.

AMD Q1 2015 Financial Results (Non-GAAP)
  Q2'2015 Q1'2015 Q2'2014
Revenue $942M $1.03B $1.44B
Gross Margin 28% 32% 35%
Operating Income -$87M -$30M $88M
Net Income -$131M -$73M $38M
Earnings Per Share -$0.17 -$0.09 $0.05

Meanwhile AMD’s gross margin has taken a hit as well. The GAAP gross margin is just 25%, while the non-GAAP gross margin is slightly better at 28%, the difference being due to AMD's $33 million charge to move 20nm products to FinFET. Both metrics are well below the kind of 30-35% margins AMD wants to sustain in the long run.

In discussing their financial results for the quarter, AMD cited the soft PC market as the biggest factor pulling down the company’s performance. Historically in turn Q2 is typically the softest quarter for technology companies, however in AMD’s case it has been especially soft. With AMD’s single biggest product line being APU sales and with those sales weaker than expected, it has significantly impacted AMD’s bottom line.

Of particular note, AMD is stating that they believe the impending launch of Windows 10 was a significant factor in their weak sales for the quarter, as consumers held back on buying new systems until the new OS is out, and OEMs held back in releasing newer designs in order to align those releases with the new OS. This has particularly impacted Carrizo, AMD’s latest generation mobile APU, given that it was released only two months before the launch of Windows 10. AMD is expecting that mobile sales will rebound once Windows 10 launches, though as we’ve seen with the launch of Windows 8 in 2012, that isn’t necessarily a given.

AMD Q2 2015 Computing and Graphics
  Q2'2015 Q1'2015 Q2'2014
Revenue $379M $532M $828M
Operating Income -$147M -$75M -$6M

Breaking down AMD’s revenue by business, soft APU sales pulled down the Computing and Graphics business overall, and led to Enterprise, Embedded, and Semi-Custom carrying a larger share of the company. Computing and Graphics revenue was down 29% over Q1’15 and a staggering 54% over Q2’14, primarily due to weak sales of notebook APUs, while graphics revenue was also down. Despite this the ASPs for both CPUs/APUs and GPUs were up on both a sequential and year-over-year basis, as while overall sales are lower, the prices of what AMD has sold has increased thanks to a richer product mix and the launch of the R9 300/Fury series at the tail end of the quarter.

AMD Q2 2015 Enterprise, Embedded and Semi-Custom
  Q2'2015 Q1'2015 Q2'2014
Revenue $563M $498M $613M
Operating Income $27M $45M $97M

Enterprise, Embedded, and Semi-Custom on the other hand had a much stronger quarter, with revenue there increasing 13% sequentially, though year-over-year revenue was still down by 8%. As part of AMD’s long-term plans they are attempting shift more of their resources and revenue over to this business, so any kind of growth is welcome growth for the company. However for this quarter in particular AMD was not prepared for such a high ratio of revenue from this business group, with the lower margin of AMD’s semi-custom products dragging down the overall gross margin.

Finally, compounding AMD’s difficulties this quarter was the impact of their previously announced plan to move the rest of their in-development 20nm products to a newer FinFET node. This project resulted in a further $33 million hit to AMD’s books, driving up losses and decreasing gross margins. The good news for AMD is that this is a one-time charge, so they won’t have to pay for it again.

Looking forward, AMD’s projections for Q3 are that sales will pick up in both the Computing and Graphics business and the Enterprise, Embedded, and Semi-Custom business. AMD is expecting improved PC sales as a result of Windows 10 and Carrizo reaching the market – in particular shoring up the company’s poor notebook sales – while orders for semi-custom processors for the game consoles will pick up in order to build up inventory for Christmas. AMD expects overall revenue to be up 6% (+/- 3%) sequentially, though the non-GAAP gross margin is expected to come in at just 29%, which is below where AMD would like to be and means there’s a good chance AMD will be in the red again for Q3.

Longer term, the company is still working on bringing their expenses under control and better aligning them with revenue, a task that becomes harder after quarters like these, with AMD admitting that the profitability timeline for the company has been pushed out. As it stands AMD still has over $800 million in cash and equivalents on-hand, however the company has also mentioned that restructuring to further cut expenses is not off the table, and that the company is assessing the option.

Source: AMD Investor Relations

Comments Locked

125 Comments

View All Comments

  • CiccioB - Friday, July 17, 2015 - link

    Efficient cards is different than efficient architecture.
    You can create the formers by using costly technology, as AMD did with Fury, but not having the latter makes your products costing more than the competition.
    That's why nvidia dominated the GPU market during these 3 years. Despite the absolute performances, which have also been inferior to those achieved by AMD (see 680 vs 7970GHz edition or the GTX960 against 380X) nvidia costs have always been inferior to AMD ones to achieve a certain performance. GK110 apart, soon swapped out with GM204, nvidia cards costs much more less than AMD ones. That's why nvidia can show different numbers at the end of the quarters.

    Pascal release will probably limited by HBMv2 availability. Second half of the year. Maybe, but at this point with no competition at all I guess it won't happen, in first half of 2016 nvidia could present those GPUs not using HBM.
    But nvidia does not need then so soon, it needs the big Pascal in order to give competition in HPC market, where Intel with new Xeon Phi at 14nm are going to dominate.
  • frenchy_2001 - Friday, July 17, 2015 - link

    ^^ This. So much THIS ^^
    What most fanboys fail to understand, is that profitability matters.
    AMD has been the nice under dog for too long. They do not know how to price their product correctly and they have had to get by on a shoe string budget for too long, so they go the brute force approach at each generation to compete on price, but that means that their solution is always less elegant and more expensive for them. Moreover, Nvidia is propped up by their professional lines, reusing the SAME dies at increased prices and their Mobile line using again the same dies at increased prices.
  • Shadow7037932 - Friday, July 17, 2015 - link

    I wonder if Samsung would buy AMD... The x86 licence thing is complicated though.
  • creed3020 - Friday, July 17, 2015 - link

    "Of particular note, AMD is stating that they believe the impending launch of Windows 10 was a significant factor in their weak sales for the quarter, as consumers held back on buying new systems until the new OS is out, and OEMs held back in releasing newer designs in order to align those releases with the new OS. This has particularly impacted Carrizo, AMD’s latest generation mobile APU, given that it was released only two months before the launch of Windows 10"

    Then why the did they release it fully knowing the rest of the industry was waiting. They should have released earlier or later. I'm still very interested in Carrizo based builds, but of course they're basically vapourware.
  • melgross - Friday, July 17, 2015 - link

    It's just an excuse. When a company isn't doing well, they try to find as many external factors they can to blame the failures on. When your sales drop almost three times much as the market you're in, then blaming that market isn't going to fool most people. I was going to say anyone, but according to the posts, some people here were fooled by it.
  • pogostick - Friday, July 17, 2015 - link

    2016 will be the make or break year for AMD. Zen is going to be all about semi-custom. The focus on this will make them a lot more nimble in the marketplace. I have a feeling that, as of the Zen introduction, AMD will be treating the PC market as just another branch of their semi-custom capability. And I also have a feeling that this might be a good thing.
  • LarryBarry - Friday, July 17, 2015 - link

    Maybe nVidia could lent them some money!? or they could buy the rights to produce some old nVidia GTX 480-580 and rebrand them as AMD R9 480 Fury and for once make a decent product!! ...just saying
  • WaltC - Friday, July 17, 2015 - link

    If this should continue for the rest of the year then I'll be concerned...but if anyone can turn it around it will be the new CEO--she knows her stuff. This quarter is always the softest tech quarter of the year. She's already given investors a timeline on the turnaround, and I'm going to stay with her assessment until it proves out, either way.
  • TWolfe - Friday, July 17, 2015 - link

    The last 6 video cards I have purchased have been ATI, before this last purchase. I had to go with nVidia for power/performance and temps. Thought long and hard before I purchased and read tons of reviews and benchmarks. First nVidia card I have owned in at least 14 years. Loving it so far, but I will say to me the colors on my monitors did not seem as vibrant initially with the nVidia card. Gotten used to it now, but I think I liked the color a bit better playing Steam on my big screen with the ATI card. Really wish they could still compete. I did actually buy one of their APU laptops last black friday as a replacement laptop for my daughter who does light gaming, and it is working well. With the correct settings it plays her games much better than her old i5 laptop.
  • D. Lister - Friday, July 17, 2015 - link

    @TWolfe

    "but I will say to me the colors on my monitors did not seem as vibrant initially with the nVidia card."

    I too do not like the default color vibrance setting on the NV GPUs. Fortunately we can change that with the "Digital Vibrance" enhancement, as shown in the linked image. By default it is set at 50, which I personally keep at 60.

    http://www.pcper.com/images/reviews/877/Eee1201N-N...

Log in

Don't have an account? Sign up now