Performance Metrics - II

In this section, we mainly look at benchmark modes in programs used on a day-to-day basis, i.e, application performance and not synthetic workloads.

x264 Benchmark

First off, we have some video encoding benchmarks courtesy of x264 HD Benchmark v5.0. This is simply a test of CPU performance. As expected, the dual-core Celeron N3000 manages to match or only slightly beat the other dual-core Bay Trail solutions.

Video Encoding - x264 5.0 - Pass 1

Video Encoding - x264 5.0 - Pass 2

7-Zip

7-Zip is a very effective and efficient compression program, often beating out OpenCL accelerated commercial programs in benchmarks even while using just the CPU power. 7-Zip has a benchmarking program that provides tons of details regarding the underlying CPU's efficiency. In this subsection, we are interested in the compression and decompression MIPS ratings when utilizing all the available threads. The results are similar to what we obtained for the x264 benchmark.

7-Zip LZMA Compression Benchmark

7-Zip LZMA Decompression Benchmark

TrueCrypt

As businesses (and even home consumers) become more security conscious, the importance of encryption can't be overstated. CPUs supporting the AES-NI instruction for accelerating the encryption and decryption processes have, till now, been the higher end SKUs. However, starting with Bay Trail, even the lowly Atom series has gained support for AES-NI. The Celeron N3000 in the Beebox does have AES-NI support. TrueCrypt, a popular open-source disk encryption program can take advantage of the AES-NI capabilities. Even though TrueCrypt is no longer under development, its internal benchmark provides some interesting cryptography-related numbers to ponder. In the graph below, we can get an idea of how fast a TrueCrypt volume would behave in the ASRock Beebox N3000-NUC and how it would compare with other select PCs. This is a purely CPU feature / clock speed based test.

TrueCrypt Benchmark

Agisoft Photoscan

Agisoft PhotoScan is a commercial program that converts 2D images into 3D point maps, meshes and textures. The program designers sent us a command line version in order to evaluate the efficiency of various systems that go under our review scanner. The command line version has two benchmark modes, one using the CPU and the other using both the CPU and GPU (via OpenCL). The benchmark takes around 50 photographs and does four stages of computation:

  • Stage 1: Align Photographs
  • Stage 2: Build Point Cloud (capable of OpenCL acceleration)
  • Stage 3: Build Mesh
  • Stage 4: Build Textures

We record the time taken for each stage. Since various elements of the software are single threaded, others multithreaded, and some use GPUs, it is interesting to record the effects of CPU generations, speeds, number of cores, DRAM parameters and the GPU using this software.

Agisoft PhotoScan Benchmark - Stage 1

Agisoft PhotoScan Benchmark - Stage 2

Agisoft PhotoScan Benchmark - Stage 3

Agisoft PhotoScan Benchmark - Stage 4

The results don't present any surprises. In general, the CPU performance of Cherry Trail SoCs can match / slightly beat the corresponding Bay Trail SoCs, but GPU performance shows marked increase.

Dolphin Emulator

Wrapping up our application benchmark numbers is the Dolphin Emulator benchmark mode results. This is again a test of the CPU capabilities, and the Beebox makes an appearance in the middle of the pack as expected.

Dolphin Emulator Benchmark

Performance Metrics - I Networking and Storage Performance
Comments Locked

45 Comments

View All Comments

  • Kobaljov - Tuesday, July 14, 2015 - link

    "As FanlessTech notes, the thermal solution is very similar to that of the Zotac ZBOX C-series - a thermal pad on a small heat sink."

    No, here the chassis is connected to the heat sink with a thermal pad too, see at the TweakTown's teardown:
    http://www.tweaktown.com/reviews/7224/asrock-beebo...

    "In the case that plastic is unavoidable due to cost issues, a perforated top similar to the Zotac ZBOX C-series units could help improve aesthetics."

    Aesthetics maybe, airflow sure.

    I still miss the HEVC test, I think it can make some sense under the 4K, without HDMI 2.0 too.
  • Kobaljov - Tuesday, July 14, 2015 - link

    Other suggestions for the ASRock from my side:
    - as the WiFi not so fast an external WiFi antenna connector will be useful for a DIY fix
    - a rechargable battery for the remote (built in charged via micro USB or AAA)
  • Earthfall - Tuesday, July 14, 2015 - link

    I didn't see a release date. When is this available?
  • Kobaljov - Tuesday, July 14, 2015 - link

    Approx mid of July for the non-OS versions (the one with memory and storage is already available here in Hungary from Friday), for the one with OS probably the end of the month, after the release of the Win 10.
  • harrkev - Tuesday, July 14, 2015 - link

    But, does it run BeOs? BeOs was designed to run on a BeBox.

    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/BeOS
  • extide - Wednesday, July 15, 2015 - link

    This is a BeeBox, not BeBox ;)
  • Stanand - Tuesday, July 14, 2015 - link

    How's the DisplayPort output? Should we assume that the DisplayPort will output 4K at 60fps? I'm actually pleasantly surprised to see DP on a cheap Braswell computer or motherboard.

    I know HDMI is the port of choice for HTPCs, but I'd like to know if I can play back 4K video at silky-smooth 60fps on one of those increasingly cheap 4K desktop displays.
  • Kobaljov - Tuesday, July 14, 2015 - link

    Unfortunately no, check the other reviews on the web, it was tested somewhere and as far as I remember it was capable of only 4K/30 or less
  • Teknobug - Monday, July 20, 2015 - link

    4K 23fps probably.
  • MacDaddy100 - Tuesday, July 14, 2015 - link

    FIRST thing I thought, Is we'd finally see the ole Be.OS being put to use, Read the article, Noticed the name Bee, Not Be. Actually before OS X when Apple had considered the Be OS, I was stoked, But they went with the UNIX based Next Step, which in the long run turned out quite well, but part of me wanted Be.OS, why I was momentarily exited when I first seen the title of this article..... Dang.

Log in

Don't have an account? Sign up now