The ASUS ZenFone 2 Review
by Brandon Chester on May 26, 2015 8:00 AM ESTVideo Performance
The other side of a phone's camera quality is how it performs when taking video. I've actually noticed an increased number of people taking videos now that the warm weather of summer has returned to Canada. Taking videos is also arguably a more intensive test of camera quality than taking still photos. A device's image signal processor needs to do post-processing in a much shorter time interval, and on devices where OIS is supported there's no way to use it to enable long exposure times as the frame rate of the video needs to be fixed high enough to keep the illusion of motion intact.
The ZenFone 2 has 3 different video settings, although the first one is 480p and not really worth discussing. The other two are the 720p30 and 1080p30 modes. While one may be tempted to just use the highest resolution mode, the caveat with 1080p30 recording is that there's no form of electronic video stabilization. ASUS also has a setting for choosing between quality and performance when recording. I assume that the performance setting is reducing frame drops at the expense of bitrate, but I didn't notice any difference in smoothness between the two modes so I recorded all the test footage using the quality setting.
The first video test is a video taken from a relatively stationary position. This gives an idea of what video quality is like without the effects of hand shake and so the device's ISP is really what will determine whether a device does well or not. I've taking recordings in both the 720p30 mode with digital stablization, and the 1080p30 mode without the EIS.
In this test the 1080p mode is the clear winner. The impact of EIS when recording at 720p is minimal, and the 720p footage is so blurry that it almost looks like upscaled 480p footage. The ZenFone 2 encodes 720p footage at 8Mbps using the H.264 Baseline profile. 1080p footage is encoded at 15Mbps and also uses H.264 Baseline. Unfortunately, even the 1080p footage isn't very impressive. There's just a general lack of sharpness throughout the entire frame.
The next test makes things more interesting by adding a significant amount of camera movement. This is where the use of EIS in the 720p mode will come into play, while the 1080p mode will most certainly have a higher degree of shakiness.
In this test it's clear that the 720p is much more stable than the 1080p footage overall. However, there are numerous instances where the the camera moves too far from its original position and the video drops frames as it settles on a new position. There's also a significant amount of high frequency shaking which makes the entire video look like it's wobbling back and forth very quickly. Both of these issues are very similar to what you see with video that is stablized using OIS, which is strange because the ZenFone 2's camera doesn't have OIS.
Unfortunately, the 720p video is again very blurry. The 1080p video is better, but is also not near as good as the output from other smartphones. It doesn't appear that there's any degree of EIS being used to stabilize the 1080p footage either. Both modes suffer from some noticeable processing issues, including halos where branches of trees are in front of the sky.
At this point it's becoming fairly evident to me that the ISP is being used in the ZenFone 2 is very far behind the competition. It would be nice if ISPs in mobile were less opaque so we had a better idea of what goes on at that stage in the pipeline. Whatever the cause may be, the ZenFone 2's video output is fairly uninspiring. If you do need to take a video with it I would still use the 1080p mode despite the shakiness, as the 720p mode is just far too blurry.
Facebook
Twitter
RSS
147 Comments
View All Comments
lexfury - Thursday, May 28, 2015 - link
It's a shame this isn't the equivalent of $200 in the UK, I would have snapped one up as a replacement for my sadly departed Nexus 5, but the cheapest I could find was £172 from a Chinese website.Not even available from within the UK yet as far as I can see, but will be £200+ no doubt when it arrives.
Still a great bit of kit for the money even at the equivalent of $250 or $300.
Dave* - Sunday, June 7, 2015 - link
Both models are available on Amazon, a U.K. supplier and fulfilled by Amazon (so free next day delivery for Prime customers).Sammaul - Thursday, May 28, 2015 - link
Phone has it's warts, but overall it really seems to be a very good value. And apparently others agree....every color, both versions, are in the top 30 unlocked phones on Amazon US. If Asus continues to update and support this, it could be their ticket into the US market. If they pull a Huawei(with the Mate 2 not getting updates), I will be very disappointed.0iron - Friday, May 29, 2015 - link
"Fast charging is essentially a trade off between battery longevity and charge times, and it really relies on the assumption that smartphones are replaced every two years which is less time than any user would notice possible adverse effects. This rapid replacement of devices is somewhat worrisome, but that's a topic for another time"I really hope the topic about fast charging effect on battery wear will come out sooner rather than later. Reason is I just bought S6 for my wife & our replacement cycle normally in 3-5 years. I foresee to keep S6 for a long time.
I will avoid fast charging now, unless it's really necessary.
cmvrgr - Friday, May 29, 2015 - link
Is it a truly DUAL SIM DUAL ACTIVE ?Rayb - Friday, May 29, 2015 - link
Of the 2 only SIM 1 will do data, SIM 2 is limited to text and calls.cmvrgr - Monday, June 1, 2015 - link
Yes. Is the only officially dsda in the world. I hate that nobody in a review mentioned it. Check their site. And the only with that feature that support band 20 (800) in Europe.nofumble62 - Saturday, May 30, 2015 - link
My Nexus 5 power switch just got stuck last week (phone gone into boot loop), so I got the $200 ASUS as a replacement. I did not miss the Nexus Lollipop at all. The Zenfone2 phone is sweat, at unbelievable price. All my old apps work just fine, and much faster than the Nexus. (I paid $350 for the Nexus5 and thought it was a bargain). I love the double tap to turn on-off. This definitely will eliminate the power button issue like in the Nexus5. I use the power button on the Nexus 5 at least 50 times a day. With the ASUS, may be 2.About bloatwares, it is non-issue. ASUS launcher actually gave me more features than standard Lollipop (such as double tap, shake). The ASUS email apps works great for my hotmail. Previously I used Outlook apps from MS, and it crashed all the time on the Nexus (what's a shame MS).
I tried Google Now launcher, and quickly realized that the double-tap does not work, so I went right back to ASUS launcher.
Anyway, I think this phone got subsidize money from Intel. It won't last forever. Get yours. Heck, at this price, I may pick one up for backup.
cmvrgr - Monday, June 1, 2015 - link
I I haven't decided yet. Super with dsfa , huge ram and good specs.I wonder if the camera is in sony imx 214 quality levels. If someone can confirm that will be super. The only that I hate from Intel cpus is that flash is not running.
I like zenui and runs smoothly in my Asus fonepad 8 dual SIM with 1gb ram only....
Bikram - Monday, June 1, 2015 - link
HI,Yes agreed that Zenfone2 battery discharges fast..... but one factor which is responsible is that it has Dual SIM Dual Active feature... which means that It has 2 receivers always active.... so eats up more power... thats the reason why maximum phones are Dual SIM Dual Standby. which helps in conserving the Battery...
I suggest to rerun these test with Single SIM on all the phones and then compare.....
Either I will be surprised... or Everyone else will be surprised.....
Thanks,