Surface 3 Design

For those familiar with the Surface line, and especially the Surface Pro 3, looking at the new Surface 3 is not going to shock you. It is certainly an evolution of the line and not a revolution. It still features the same magnesium body which really feels great in the hand. It really is unlike aluminium in feel, and I find that the Surface 3 texture gives plenty of grip, unlike some polished devices.

Microsoft paid a lot of attention when building these tablets, and their efforts are clearly seen all over. I have already discussed the kickstand when it is open, but when it is closed, it sits absolutely flush with the body, and the body has an angled edge to it, which the kickstand also must have. The power button and volume button both fit very snug and have a great clicky feel.

The biggest and best change to the design is what carries over from the Surface Pro 3; the 3:2 aspect ratio. 16:9 is really not ideal for a tablet in either orientation. In portrait mode, it is much too tall and skinny, and in landscape mode, the tablet is too long and can feel unbalanced.


Surface 3 over Surface 3 Pro

The move to 3:2 is a revelation for tablet use, and the Surface 3 is a much better tablet than even the Surface Pro 3. It is smaller, thinner, lighter, and just easier to hold. The smaller version is really quite good to use in portrait mode, which is something that could never have been said of Surface RT or Surface 2. I’m not sure if we have found a “perfect” aspect ratio for a tablet, but 3:2 offers a lot of advantages and very few drawbacks. It is better in landscape for actual productivity tasks thanks to the extra vertical space, and better for portrait because of the more balanced width.

One of the other great design features that Microsoft has been able to incorporate into the Surface line is front facing speakers. Sound does not travel well through things, so having the speakers pointed backwards just can’t compete. The best part of the speakers on the Surface line is just how inconspicuous they are. There are two tiny slots on the upper sides of the tablet (when in landscape) and they blend in surprisingly well with the black bezels, to the point where you may not even notice them unless you have the device in the right kind of lighting. We will see later on just how well they sound, but the placement of them is great.

The port selection is good too, and this is what helps Surface to be a laptop. There is a mini-DisplayPort on the upper right side, and just under that is a USB 3.0 port. This full sized port lets you connect almost anything to the tablet. In addition, there is an audio jack at the bottom right side, and in between the USB and audio is the charging port.

Microsoft has always used a proprietary charging connector on all of the Surface devices. The original Surface RT had a magnetic charger which would stick on to the device, and light up. It was reversible too, so you could connect it either way. The original had some issues with connections, and they tweaked the design. However for the Surface 3, they have ditched that connector completely and went with a standard micro-USB connector.

The use of micro-USB has some advantages and drawbacks. The advantage is that you can now charge the Surface 3 with any cord you already have for almost all smartphones (only Apple doesn’t use micro-USB) so that is a win. The drawback though is that micro-USB charging is generally power limited to only a handful of watts. A typical phone charger may only be five watts, and some of the better ones will be ten. The Surface 3 comes with a thirteen watt charger. Later we will see what effect that has on charge times, but it really is not a lot of power.

I think it is a missed opportunity to not be forward leaning on the charging port and use a USB Type-C connector. This would keep the reversible nature which is much better than what they have now, and Type-C can handle much more power (without ever going out of spec) offering them the opportunity to supply a bigger charger. Going to micro-USB now feels like a step backwards to be honest. Because the Surface already has a full sized USB port, you don’t run into the problems like the Macbook where it is only one Type-C. Type-C is the future, and not seeing it on this device makes it take a step back in the past.

The bottom of the Surface 3 keeps the now familiar magnetic connector and pins for the keyboard, and a groove runs along the bottom for the keyboard to fit in to.

On the top of the Surface is a slightly different color strip of plastic which will be the RF transparent window for all of the necessary antennae. I like that they did not try to color match the device because the contrast makes for a much nicer look, and trying to color match metal and plastic can end up looking poorly, especially over time. The plastic strip also features the 8 MP rear camera.

When you look at tablet design in the Windows world, there really is Surface and everything else. The device just feels solid, and the magnesium finish is so great to hold in the hand. The fit and finish of the Surface is as good as any other device on the market.

Kickstand and Accessories Powering the Surface 3: Intel’s Atom x7 System on a Chip
Comments Locked

265 Comments

View All Comments

  • augiem - Monday, May 4, 2015 - link

    Running [a full desktop OS] in the [ulv] tablet space is completely unheard of...
  • romprak - Tuesday, May 5, 2015 - link

    There are folks who will defend Apple to the hilt for the way they charge for extra storage, but then claim that Microsoft is pricing the Surface 3 too high. This is a premium device, made of quality materials, with a quality screen, and runs full 64-bit Windows, with real ports (USB and Displayport), with expandable storage. I think it is priced very reasonably. I think if they could drop the keyboard to $99, I think that would make a difference in perception. $129 stretches comfort perhaps a bit too far and gives sticker shock.
  • Skywax9016 - Monday, May 18, 2015 - link

    Unfortunately, they are not simply competing with iPad in the market. They are also competing with other Windows Tablet/Hybrid devices. When compared to what a PC does better, there a more than a few Windows Tablet/Hybrid devices that can perform better than a Surface 3 for around the same price. When compared to what a Tablet does better, there is iPad and other plethora of Android tablets available which can perform better than a Surface 3 for around the same price.

    I actually like the Surface 3 really, but it seems that it is somewhat stuck in the middle by not excelling in anything compared to other competing products. Maybe, a faster internal storage can actually help to boost performance, but right now, maybe it's a product that doesn't suit me well enough.
  • Gunbuster - Monday, May 4, 2015 - link

    Why, oh why are they still using that f-ing terrible Marvell Avastar WiFi/Bluetooth...
  • MarcSP - Monday, May 4, 2015 - link

    Great review! It would be nice to ask Microsoft about the battery life. They promiss around 10 hours of video playback, and you got much less (and also much less that other reviewers, that got at least 1 hour more than you).
  • SpartanJet - Monday, May 4, 2015 - link

    I'd bet anything they were using Chrome for the tests, aside from the fact its a front for free data mining for that Ad company, its a horrible battery drain on these mobile devices.
  • Brett Howse - Monday, May 4, 2015 - link

    For tablet mode, I used Modern IE, and for notebook it was desktop IE.

    I spoke to some other people who have tested the device, and they were testing it at a lower brightness level which is going to impact the battery life a lot since the display is the main power draw.
  • lilmoe - Monday, May 4, 2015 - link

    Which program do you use for the video playback test? What type of video file?
  • id4andrei - Tuesday, May 5, 2015 - link

    Jarred Walton once tested the state of video playback in relation to battery drain on Windows. VLC is the Chrome of video players. The most power efficient video players are the video app(modern) and the tried and true windows media player(in this order).
  • MarcSP - Tuesday, May 5, 2015 - link

    Thanks for the clarification :-), but what about the software for video playback and the video format? As other said, it can affect quite a lot the result.

Log in

Don't have an account? Sign up now