AMD A8-7650K Conclusion

I've mentioned the story before, but last summer I built a system for my cousin-in-law out of spare parts. His old system, ancient and slow even by the standards when they were made, was still used for basic online browsing and school work. He had no budget, and I cobbled together an MSI motherboard, some DDR3, a mid-range Trinity APU (A8-5500), an AMD GPU and an SSD for him. Understandably he can now play CS:Go, DOTA2, Watch_Dogs and the like at semi reasonable settings in dual graphics mode, as well as watch videos without the processor grinding to a halt. He even plays GTA V at normal settings at his native resolution of 1440x900. The total system budget, if purchased new, would have been around the $300 mark, or console territory. We reused the case and power supply, and he bought a new storage drive, but for his use case it was a night and day change. Building the equivalent system on an Intel backbone would have been a stretch or it would have ended up substituting gaming performance (my cousin-in-law's priority) for other features he didn't care for.

AMD will advertise that they don't just cater to this line of updates, and that the APU line offers more than just an upgrade for entry level gamers. In the majority of our discrete gaming scenarios, this is also true. While the APUs aren't necessarily ahead in terms of absolute performance, and in some situations they are behind, but with the right combination of hardware the APU route can offer equivalent performance at a cheaper rate. This is ultimately why APUs were recommended in our two last big gaming CPU overviews for single GPU gaming, and for integrated gaming. In our new test, it was really interesting to see where the lines are drawn with different CPU and GPU combinations, both integrated and discrete from $70 to $560. One take home test result is our Grand Theft Auto benchmark nearing 60 FPS at 720p Low settings.

Grand Theft Auto V on Integrated Graphics

Grand Theft Auto V on Integrated Graphics [Under 60 FPS]

I confess that I do not game as much as I used to. Before AnandTech I played a couple of games in clan tournaments, and through thick and thin I did well enough on public servers for Battlefield 2142 and BC2, but clan matches were almost always duds. However, with the right hardware or the right software, I get one AAA title a year and usually do the full single player with a bit of multiplayer. That game for 2015 is Grand Theft Auto V, which I was able to benchmark for this review. On its own, an APU can handle 720p at low settings with a reasonable frame rate, meaning that when the drivers are in place, An APU in dual graphics mode running at 60 FPS with decent quality shouldn't be too hard to achieve. For 2015 and 2016, that percentage of frames over 60 FPS metric for GTA should be a holy grail for integrated graphics.

We've actually got a couple more APUs in to test in the form of the A10-7700K and the A6-7400K, which are slightly older APUs but fill in the Kaveri data points we are missing. Stay tuned for that capsule review. Rumor also has it that there will be updates to the Kaveri line soon, although we haven’t had any official details as of yet.

Gaming Benchmarks: GTX 980 and R9 290X
Comments Locked

177 Comments

View All Comments

  • evolucion8 - Wednesday, May 13, 2015 - link

    Actually the R9 280/280X have a 384-Bit BUS and their memory is clocked higher. That is why they offer around 288GB/s for it alone while the PS4 has 176GB/s shared for the system including RAM/BUS/CPU/GPU operations.
  • Edens_Remorse - Wednesday, May 27, 2015 - link

    /slow clap
  • evolucion8 - Friday, October 16, 2015 - link

    280/280X actually has a 384-Bit BUS.
  • DevilSlayerWizard - Wednesday, May 13, 2015 - link

    Every one of those 8 cores are a big joke compared to even Nehalem.
  • silverblue - Wednesday, May 13, 2015 - link

    ...and this says you're telling porkies, for the most part:

    http://anandtech.com/bench/product/697?vs=47
    Changed the 47 to a 100 for the 950, and to 45 for the 965 Extreme. Remember that these are 8-thread, triple channel CPUs.
  • nikaldro - Thursday, May 14, 2015 - link

    Mmmm hellooooo? You actually believe that 8 Jaguar cores can even remotely be compared to any decent desktop class cpu?
  • Kraelic - Thursday, May 14, 2015 - link

    Those older generation discontinued Intel at 3 GHz trade blows with a current 4GHz AMD. Do you not get the joke?
  • redraider89 - Tuesday, May 19, 2015 - link

    That's not what he said. Who knows what he means. AMD's comment about what? Poached eggs? Like I said, stupid.
  • yannigr2 - Tuesday, May 12, 2015 - link

    56 comments.
  • yannigr2 - Wednesday, May 13, 2015 - link

    108 comments.

Log in

Don't have an account? Sign up now