Haswell Architecture Improvements

We have discussed the advantages that the Haswell core brings here in more detail. In a nutshell:

  • The core can sustain about 10% more integer instructions per clock cycle than its predecessor, Ivy Bridge. 
  • Virtualized applications should perform slightly better thanks to the lower VM exit/entry latency.
  • HPC applications could/should benefit much more if they are recompiled to make use of the improved AVX2 and Fused Multiply Add (FMA) support
  • Database transactional applications should benefit more thanks to the lower synchronization latency.
  • In-memory databases should benefit if they are adapted to make use of the AVX-2 256 bit integer vector operations.  

Again, the same is true about the Xeon E5-2600v3. So what makes the E7 special? 

Transactional Synchronization Extensions: I'll be back 

There is one "new" - or rather "now working" - feature: TSX or the famous Transactional Synchronization eXtensions. These extensions are all about making locking more "optimistic" (you let the CPU handle the bookkeeping to maintain consistency). TSX is quite powerful, but also can be a liability in the wrong use case. Developers will need a deep understanding of the locking and parallel programming to be able to make good use of TSX, as 

  1. ... you still have to rewrite your code (inserting hints)
  2. TSX may reduce performance in some situations: if indeed a pessimistic lock was necessary, the transaction has to be re-executed with a "traditional" conservative way of locking. You could call it a "lock misprediction".  

Introducing TSX in software requires assessing the different locks in application, using different libraries and quite a bit of of tuning. SAP and Intel did this for the expensive in-memory data mining SAP HANA software.  

 

The upgrade from "Ivy Bridge EX" to "Haswell-EX" yielded 50% performance, while introducing TSX roughly doubled performance. So in TSX enabled data mining software, Haswell-EX has the potential to reduce the waiting time by a factor of 3 and more. 

Xeon E7 v3 System and Memory Architecture Xeon E7 v3 SKUs and prices
Comments Locked

146 Comments

View All Comments

  • MyNuts - Tuesday, May 12, 2015 - link

    Charles Babbage would be upset
  • quadibloc - Thursday, May 14, 2015 - link

    I'm shocked to hear that Oracle and IBM are charging more for their SPARC and PowerPC chips, respectively, than Intel is charging for comparable x86 chips - or, at least, I presume they are, if servers using those chips are more expensive. Since x86 has the enormous advantage of being able to run Microsoft Windows, the only way other ISAs can be viable is if they offer better performance or a lower price.
  • Kevin G - Thursday, May 14, 2015 - link

    Actually IBM comes in cheaper than Intel for comparable POWER8 hardware. IBM now is offering the processor to outside system builders so the actual prices are some what known. Tyan used to have the raw prices on their site but I can't find them again.

    Regardless, this article indicates that they top out at $3000 which is less than equivalent Xeon E7's.
  • kgardas - Thursday, May 21, 2015 - link

    Sure, SPARC and POWER are (was in case of POWER) more expensive, but usually hardware price is nothing in comparison with software price if you are running enterprise. Also SPARC is also Oracle preferred over POWER/Itanium by Oracle's price ratios... Anyway, POWER8 looks so powerful that it may even be cheaper software wise in comparison with SPARC, but that would need some clever Oracle DB benchmarking...
  • HighTech4US - Friday, May 15, 2015 - link

    Power 9 will be available when?
  • Phiro69 - Friday, May 15, 2015 - link

    I wanted to compare the E7's in this review to the E5's reviewed a few months back in your benchmark comparison tool, but I'm not seeing any of this data in it? Is it going to be there?

Log in

Don't have an account? Sign up now