Benchmark Configuration

All tests were done on Ubuntu Server 14.04 LTS (soon to be upgraded to 15.04). Aside from the SuperMicro Xeon-D system, we also have the ASRock Rack C2750D4I (eight core Silvermont), a Xeon E3-1200 v3 system, a Xeon E3-1200 v2 system, a 1P Xeon E5-2600L v3 and a HP Moonshot cartridge based system. We tested the HP Moonshot cartridges remotely.

Supermicro's 5028D-TN4T

CPU Xeon D-1540 2.0 GHz
RAM 4x16GB DDR4-2133
Internal Disks Samsung 850 Pro 128 GB
Motherboard SuperMicro X10SLD-F
PSU FSP250-50LC (250 W, 80+ Bronze)

Below you can find most of the CPU settings in the BIOS:

ASRock's C2750D4I

CPU Intel Atom C2750 2.4 GHz
RAM 4x8GB DDR3-1600
Internal Disks Samsung 850 Pro 128 GB
Motherboard ASRock C2750D4I
PSU Supermicro PWS-502 (80+)

The Xeon D is not a replacement for the Atom C2000. Although the Xeon D is also a SoC, the Atom C2000 remains Intel low power options for microservers. Of course, we want to know how much power you save, and how large the performance trade-off is. 

Intel's Xeon E3-1200 v3 – ASUS P9D-MH

CPU Intel Xeon processor E3-1240 v3 3.4 GHz
Intel Xeon processor E3-1230L v3 1.8 GHz
RAM 4x8GB DDR3-1600
Internal Disks 1x Samsung 850 Pro 128 GB
Motherboard ASUS P9D-MH
PSU Supermicro PWS-502 (80+)

As the Xeon D is limited to 2 GHz (2.6 GHz turboboost), higher clocked Xeon E3s might still make sense where single threaded performance is a major concern. The Xeon E3-1230L was included as a low power alternative, although we wonder it still make sense, considering that the Xeon E3 needs a separate 1-4W chipset (C220). 

Intel's Xeon E3-1200 v2

CPU Intel Xeon processor E3-1265L v2
RAM 4x8GB DDR3-1600
Internal Disks 1x Intel MLC SSD710 200GB
Motherboard Intel S1200BTL
PSU Supermicro PWS-502 (80+)

The previous generation low power Xeon E3. 

Intel's Xeon E5 Server – "Wildcat Pass" (2U Chassis)

CPU One Intel Xeon processor E5-2650L v3 (1.8GHz, 12c, 30MB L3, 65W)
RAM 128GB (8x16GB) Samsung M393A2G40DB0 (RDIMM)
Internal Disks 2x Intel MLC SSD710 200GB
Motherboard Intel Server Board Wildcat Pass
PSU Delta Electronics 750W DPS-750XB A (80+ Platinum)

Although our E5 server is not comparable to the other systems, it important to gauge where a low power E5 model would land. We like to understand when it make sense to invest more money in an Xeon E5 system, and here we only use one Xeon. Note that this system also requires power from a separate PCH. 

HP Moonshot

More info about this configuration can be found in our previous article about micro server SoCs.  

We tested two different cartridges: the m400 and the m300. Below you can find the specs of the m400:

CPU/SoC AppliedMicro X-Gene 2.4
RAM 8x 8GB DDR3 @ 1600
Internal Disks M.2 2280 Solid State 120GB
Cartridge m400

And the m300:

CPU/SoC Atom C2750 2.4
RAM 8x 8GB DDR3 @ 1600
Internal Disks M.2 2280 Solid State 120GB
Cartridge m300

Other Notes

Both servers are fed by a standard European 230V (16 Amps max.) power line. The room temperature is monitored and kept at 23°C by our Airwell CRACs. We use the Racktivity ES1008 Energy Switch PDU to measure power consumption in our lab. We used the HP Moonshot ILO to measure the power consumption of the cartridges.

Meet the SuperServer 5028D-TN4T: Inside Memory Subsystem: Bandwidth
Comments Locked

90 Comments

View All Comments

  • extide - Wednesday, June 24, 2015 - link

    So, I was thinking last night, that this chip is THE PERFECT enthusiast chip! All Intel needs to do is release an unlocked and socketed version (although that would be complex because there is currently no platform for it ...) although if we could get at least an unlocked version on an enthusiast style board it would be awesome.

    Think about it:
    8 Broadwell cores -- Great!
    12MB L3 -- Great!
    24 Lanes PCIe 3.0 -- More than 16 or even skylakes rumored 20, pretty good. You could do things like 16x + 8x, or 8x + 8x + 4x + 4x (the two 4x being m.2 ssd's) which would support CF or SLI quite well and some fast ssd's.
    2ch DDR4 -- plenty for gaming and most enthusiast applications
    Dual 10GbE -- Just added Gravvy here, but would def help adoption of 10g in the enthusiast realm.

    COME ON INTEL!!
  • extide - Wednesday, June 24, 2015 - link

    Also, I forgot to add:

    This would be a great intermediate between the current regular consumer stuff (LGA 115x) and HPDE (LGA 2011x) -- A lot of people really see the LGA 2011 platform as overkill, even for enthusiasts, and it gets so expensive, with quad channel ddr4 and all that. This chip just seems to make so much sense. Now if intel priced it no more than the $500 mark, that would be awesome. Imagine, if AMD was more competitive, we might actually have that5 scenario.... Hopefully Zen is just great!
  • Namisecond - Saturday, June 27, 2015 - link

    Intel's tray price for this chip is listed at $199 for the 4-core and $581 for the 8-core. The price for the CPU+motherboard is almost $1K for the 8 core. which indicates the problem is not in the price of the chip itself.

    If you want cheap and low power consumption, I'd direct you to the S1150 platform with Xeon E3 V3 "L" series (13-45W) processors.
  • spikebike - Wednesday, June 24, 2015 - link

    For a home machine, small server, workstation, or similar the Xeon D 1520 looks even better. Faster clock, 1/3rd the price, same maximum ram, ecc, etc. Sure it's got 4 cores/8threads instead of more, but for many use cases that's not a big limitation. In quite a few cases spending the $400 different on RAM or SSDs will make a bigger difference.
  • hifiaudio2 - Thursday, June 25, 2015 - link

    Where can you get a 1520? Google searching is not finding anything for sale...
  • hifiaudio2 - Thursday, June 25, 2015 - link

    If I cannot find the 1520 for sale, what is the best bang for the buck i3 and MB combo (want to use ECC ram as well) for a Media server/transcode/nas? Low TDP, etc..
  • jaziniho - Thursday, June 25, 2015 - link

    Any word on whether HP plan to make a Moonshot cartridge featuring Xeon D? the 45W TDP seems to match up with some of the previous chips they have used.
  • jeffsci - Monday, June 29, 2015 - link

    Why do the results use a variety of OSS compilers? For an Intel Xeon processor, the Intel compilers are the most reliable. Is Open64 actively developed for Intel processors? And switching from GCC 4.8 to 4.9 with different flags...how is this even remotely scientific?
  • needforsuv - Saturday, July 11, 2015 - link

    so they just done to the 'regular' 4/8 i7/e3 what they did to the C2D in making the C2Q but more sophisticated I like it now wheres that lga 115x 8 core
  • tabascosauz - Sunday, July 19, 2015 - link

    I hope that Mr. de Gelas will continue to learn and improve as a writer, because the grammar in this article is, in numerous places, rather iffy and AT has traditionally excelled in delivering detailed, grammatically correct content.

Log in

Don't have an account? Sign up now