3DMark Sky Diver Results

Most of the previous benchmarks were day to day tasks. Some involved the GPU, but it was never the focus. We will now move on to benchmarks which focus on GPU performance to see what kind of an effect this can have. Remember, the TDP of Core M is 4.5 watts including the integrated graphics, so any thermal room needed for graphics is going to come at the expense of the CPU. 3DMark Sky Diver is aimed for gaming laptops and mid-range PCs, so it is a bit too much load for integrated graphics. But it does feature DirectX 11 and includes both graphics and physics tests. The benchmark is around five minutes long.


We can see that the Core i5 continues shrugging off these tests. While the SoC did heat up, the GPU frequency was flat throughout the results. This is quite a bit different than all of the Core M processors, which had to throttle both the CPU and GPU as needed. It is very interesting especially in the UX305 results to see that the GPU is throttled on high CPU workloads to give more headroom for the CPU, which you can see on the third heat spike in its graph. This would be the physics test, which relies heavily on the CPU. The Dell Venue 11 and Yoga 3 Pro had very different temperature curves, and the Yoga 3 Pro had to throttle the GPU quite a bit to stay at its target SoC temperature.

3DMark Sky Diver CPU Performance

Looking at the average CPU frequencies reaffirms what we have seen in previous results. The ASUS, despite having the lowest turbo frequency, has the highest average for the Core M devices. But it is the GPU frequencies which are the most important in this test.

3DMark Sky Diver GPU Performance

All of the Core M devices had to throttle the GPU to some extent, but the ASUS did the least. The Yoga 3 Pro and Dell Venue 11 Pro were basically tied in average GPU frequency for the duration of this test. GPU workloads can pull a lot of power into the SoC, which can raise temperatures as we will see in the next graph.

3DMark Sky Diver Temperature

Looking at the SoC temperatures explains the results. The Yoga 3 Pro has an average of 65.2°C, which is the target temperature for the Yoga. This means it was not able to leverage the breaks in workloads to ramp up its higher turbo frequencies when needed. The Dell Venue 11 is at almost 90°C for the benchmark, and that is also its limit. The ASUS, with its better cooling, manages to basically mirror the Core i5 for SoC temperature.

Futuremark 3DMark (2013)

The excellent cooling of the ASUS form factor shines in the GPU tests. For the overall score, it comes very close to the Core i5. Both of the 5Y71 devices struggle under sustained GPU workloads, as the scores confirm.

TouchXPRT 2014 Results 3DMark Cloud Gate Results
Comments Locked

110 Comments

View All Comments

  • wintermute000 - Friday, April 10, 2015 - link

    I actually want to see comparisons with desktops (esp older ones like Sandy era)
  • ToTTenTranz - Wednesday, April 8, 2015 - link

    Is there a review of the Dell Venue Pro 7000 coming up?

    In Europe, that tablet is priced similarly to the non-Pro Surface 3, so it would be interesting to make a comparison between a Core M and a Cherry Trail X7 device in a similar form factor regarding performance and battery life.
  • Brett Howse - Wednesday, April 8, 2015 - link

    Yes.
  • Daishi83 - Wednesday, April 8, 2015 - link

    How about the T300 Chi? Preferably with FHD display
  • Brett Howse - Wednesday, April 8, 2015 - link

    I'm but one man, but it is on my radar.
  • kyuu - Wednesday, April 8, 2015 - link

    It seems to me that the issue with the Yoga isn't poor cooling per se, but the inexplicable decision to have a target CPU temp of 65 degrees under load. If they allowed it to go up to 90 as the other devices do, it would almost certainly be the best performer.
  • dusk007 - Thursday, April 9, 2015 - link

    I would prefer it the way it is. Maybe it would be good if the user could decide by switching power plans. Not sure how it works.
    But generally I would not do much work that requires sustained performance on such a hybrid yoga. It is good for bursty workloads and stays cool even on high load flash website like a twitch high resolution stream (which heats my 15" MBP quite a bit). If it gets the work done while being cool to touch it is better. If you put it on a table it can be quite hot as long as the keyboard is reasonably cool. But pick it up and use it actually on your lap in normal or tablet mode, that 65C temp limit is a godsend.

    It theory that should be in the windows power plan so one can just switch it to something else when performance means more than cool operation. I think in such a notebook performance should take a back seat.
  • vegemeister - Friday, April 10, 2015 - link

    Increasing the max temperature wouldn't make it run any hotter unless you actually needed the performance.
  • tsk2k - Wednesday, April 8, 2015 - link

    Good read. I'm curious to see whether skylake core M improves much over this when it launches later this year.
  • Crunchy005 - Wednesday, April 8, 2015 - link

    Performance gains between archs in the same TDP...I feel between 1-5%? Haven't seen any huge performance gains in a long time just minor improvements.

Log in

Don't have an account? Sign up now