Gaming Benchmarks

The gaming credentials of the AMD R9 270MX are quite impressive. We already know what it is capable of, thanks to our coverage in the VisionX 420D review. We are looking at the same GPU configuration in the VisionX 471D. However, we do have a more capable CPU (Core i7-4712MQ vs. the Core i5-4200M) this time around.

For the purpose of benchmarking, we chose five different games (Company of Heroes 2, Sleeping Dogs, Tomb Raider, Bioshock Infinite and DiRT Showdown) at three different quality levels. As someone focusing on HTPCs and multimedia aspects, I rarely get to process gaming benchmarks, even while evaluating GPUs. One of the aspects that I feared was spending lot of time in installing the same games again and again on different PCs under the review scanner. The solution was to go the Steam route. Unfortunately, Steam also likes to keep the game files updated. A quick online search revealed that Steam could make use of an external drive for storing the game executables and downloadable content. With the Steam drive on-the-go use-case being read-heavy, the Corsair Flash Voyager GS USB 3.0 128GB Flash Drive (with read speeds of up to 275 MBps) was ideal for use as a portable Steam drive.

Company of Heroes 2

Company of Heroes 2 - Performance Score

Company of Heroes 2 - Quality Score

Company of Heroes 2 - Extreme Score

In this title, there are benefits provided by the better CPU. But, it is debatable whether the difference is noticeable in real-world gameplay. In addition, the GB-BXi5G-760 performs much better than the VisionX 471D. However, the acoustic profile of the VisionX 471D is way better.

Sleeping Dogs

Sleeping Dogs - Performance Score

Sleeping Dogs - Quality Score

Sleeping Dogs - Extreme Score

In this title, the three leading systems are much more evenly matched.The choice of CPU has almost negligible effect on the performance.

Tomb Raider

Tomb Raider - Performance Score

Tomb Raider - Quality Score

Tomb Raider - Extreme Score

The situation for Tomb Raider is similar to that of Sleeping Dogs. The better CPU provides marginal gains and the GTX 760 and the R9 270MX provide almost equivalent performance.

Bioshock Infinite

Bioshock Infinite - Performance Score

Bioshock Infinite - Quality Score

Bioshock Infinite - Extreme Score

In Bioshock Infinite, the GTX 760 is way ahead of the R9 270MX. Again, the acoustic profile of the two relevant PCs must be kept in mind.

DiRT Showdown

DiRT Showdown - Performance Score

DiRT Showdown - Quality Score

DiRT Showdown - Extreme Score

The VisionX 471D performs very well in DiRT Showdown compared to the other PCs. In fact, at lower resolutions, the unit manages a healthy lead compared to the GTX 760-equipped GB-BXi5G-760. At higher resolutions / quality, the performance of both units is very similar.

Performance Metrics - II Networking and Storage Performance
Comments Locked

30 Comments

View All Comments

  • Kevin G - Monday, January 26, 2015 - link

    According to the manual on ASrock's site, yes it is an MXM card and it can be changed. The real question is what MXM cards are readily available to put into that system.
  • Samus - Monday, January 26, 2015 - link

    Quadro's. lol.
  • DanNeely - Monday, January 26, 2015 - link

    Not just available; but unless you mod the cooling, suitably low TDP. The R9 M270X's TDP isn't public; but is probably a bit under the similar (except for higher clocks) 50W M275X.
  • basroil - Monday, January 26, 2015 - link

    I got excited for a bit thinking I finally found a nice controller for a kinect powered robot I have... but then I read the review and saw it's pretty much useless... Guess I have to wait for the 960 / 970m powered Brix....
  • nos024 - Monday, January 26, 2015 - link

    Weak. For that price, you can build a system that is much better with the Raven RVZ01 case. WTH are these companies smoking?
  • iniudan - Monday, January 26, 2015 - link

    That raven case is like 5-6 time the volume of this, that not a proper comparison.
  • boe - Tuesday, February 3, 2015 - link

    I'd rather they had their own version of the Heatsync 7000 so the unit required no fans.
  • zodiacfml - Monday, January 26, 2015 - link

    Nice toy have but as others have mentioned, it is too expensive.
    What can we build using a mini-itx board for that price?
    If size didn't matter, this is a mid-range gaming system from its cost.
  • baii9 - Monday, January 26, 2015 - link

    a mini PC review with no word on dimension or any size comparison , just great.
  • mostlyharmless - Monday, January 26, 2015 - link

    Still hoping for a mini-PC stackable module standard that would reduce the tangle of cables to a manageable few.

Log in

Don't have an account? Sign up now