Performance Metrics - II

In this section, we mainly look at benchmark modes in programs used on a day-to-day basis, i.e, application performance and not synthetic workloads.

x264 Benchmark

First off, we have some video encoding benchmarks courtesy of x264 HD Benchmark v5.0. This is simply a test of CPU performance. As expected, the higher-clocked / higher-TDP Core i7-4770R-based systems perform better than the Core i7-4712MQ in the VisionX 471D. However, the significant upgrade over the Core i5-4200M in the VisionX 420D must be noted.

Video Encoding - x264 5.0 - Pass 1

Video Encoding - x264 5.0 - Pass 2

7-Zip

7-Zip is a very effective and efficient compression program, often beating out OpenCL accelerated commercial programs in benchmarks even while using just the CPU power. 7-Zip has a benchmarking program that provides tons of details regarding the underlying CPU's efficiency. In this subsection, we are interested in the compression and decompression MIPS ratings when utilizing all the available threads.

7-Zip LZMA Compression Benchmark

7-Zip LZMA Decompression Benchmark

TrueCrypt

As businesses (and even home consumers) become more security conscious, the importance of encryption can't be overstated. CPUs supporting the AES-NI instruction for accelerating the encryption and decryption processes have, till now, been the higher end SKUs. However, with Bay Trail, even the lowly Atom series has gained support for AES-NI. The Core i7-4712MQ in the VisionX 471D does have AES-NI support. TrueCrypt, a popular open-source disk encryption program can take advantage of the AES-NI capabilities. The TrueCrypt internal benchmark provides some interesting cryptography-related numbers to ponder. In the graph below, we can get an idea of how fast a TrueCrypt volume would behave in the ASRock VisionX 471D and how it would compare with other select PCs. This is a purely CPU feature / clock speed based test.

TrueCrypt Benchmark

Agisoft Photoscan

Agisoft PhotoScan is a commercial program that converts 2D images into 3D point maps, meshes and textures. The program designers sent us a command line version in order to evaluate the efficiency of various systems that go under our review scanner. The command line version has two benchmark modes, one using the CPU and the other using both the CPU and GPU (via OpenCL). The benchmark takes around 50 photographs and does four stages of computation:

  • Stage 1: Align Photographs
  • Stage 2: Build Point Cloud (capable of OpenCL acceleration)
  • Stage 3: Build Mesh
  • Stage 4: Build Textures

We record the time taken for each stage. Since various elements of the software are single threaded, others multithreaded, and some use GPUs, it is interesting to record the effects of CPU generations, speeds, number of cores, DRAM parameters and the GPU using this software. One can reap significant benefits from the AMD R9 270MX in the OpenCL-accelerated second stage, as shown in the graphs below.

Agisoft PhotoScan Benchmark - Stage 1

Agisoft PhotoScan Benchmark - Stage 2

Agisoft PhotoScan Benchmark - Stage 3

Agisoft PhotoScan Benchmark - Stage 4

Dolphin Emulator

Wrapping up our application benchmark numbers is the Dolphin Emulator benchmark mode results. This is again a test of the CPU capabilities. Larger the number of available threads, the better is the performance. Within that set, systems based on CPUs with faster clocks / higher TDP compared to the Core i7-4712MQ perform better.

Dolphin Emulator Benchmark

Performance Metrics - I Gaming Benchmarks
Comments Locked

30 Comments

View All Comments

  • Kevin G - Monday, January 26, 2015 - link

    According to the manual on ASrock's site, yes it is an MXM card and it can be changed. The real question is what MXM cards are readily available to put into that system.
  • Samus - Monday, January 26, 2015 - link

    Quadro's. lol.
  • DanNeely - Monday, January 26, 2015 - link

    Not just available; but unless you mod the cooling, suitably low TDP. The R9 M270X's TDP isn't public; but is probably a bit under the similar (except for higher clocks) 50W M275X.
  • basroil - Monday, January 26, 2015 - link

    I got excited for a bit thinking I finally found a nice controller for a kinect powered robot I have... but then I read the review and saw it's pretty much useless... Guess I have to wait for the 960 / 970m powered Brix....
  • nos024 - Monday, January 26, 2015 - link

    Weak. For that price, you can build a system that is much better with the Raven RVZ01 case. WTH are these companies smoking?
  • iniudan - Monday, January 26, 2015 - link

    That raven case is like 5-6 time the volume of this, that not a proper comparison.
  • boe - Tuesday, February 3, 2015 - link

    I'd rather they had their own version of the Heatsync 7000 so the unit required no fans.
  • zodiacfml - Monday, January 26, 2015 - link

    Nice toy have but as others have mentioned, it is too expensive.
    What can we build using a mini-itx board for that price?
    If size didn't matter, this is a mid-range gaming system from its cost.
  • baii9 - Monday, January 26, 2015 - link

    a mini PC review with no word on dimension or any size comparison , just great.
  • mostlyharmless - Monday, January 26, 2015 - link

    Still hoping for a mini-PC stackable module standard that would reduce the tangle of cables to a manageable few.

Log in

Don't have an account? Sign up now