Acer XB280HK: sRGB Calibration and Bench Tests

Pre-calibration the Acer has a blue tint to the grayscale and a very strange bump past 95%. This kind of bump typically means that the contrast is set too high, causing the panel to run out of a particular color before others. In this case it seems to be running out of red and green, causing the blue levels to spike. The gamma keeps rising as well, causing the dE2000 values for the grayscale to reach 3.0 at points.

Colors are fairly well behaved, with the dE2000 values for the color checker staying below 3.0 for most of the range. They are very close to 3.0, so on static images you can tell the difference from accurate colors, but for non-professionals the display performs reasonably well.

For calibration, we use SpectraCal CalMAN 5.3.5 with our own custom workflow. We target 200 cd/m2 of light output with a gamma of 2.2 and the sRGB color gamut, which corresponds to a general real-world use case. The meters used are an i1Pro2 provided by X-Rite and a SpectraCal C6. All measurements use APL 50% patterns except for uniformity testing, which uses full field.

  Pre-Calibration Post-Calibration,
200 cd/m2
Post-Calibration,
80 cd/m2
White Level ( cd/m2) 200.0 200.4 78.8
Black Level ( cd/m2) 0.2602 0.2723 0.1157
Contrast Ratio 769:1 736:1 681:1
Gamma (Average) 2.31 2.18 2.60
Color Temperature 7065K 6629K 6493K
Grayscale dE2000 2.18 0.44 0.59
Color Checker dE2000 2.42 1.60 1.55
Saturations dE2000 2.35 1.36 1.48
 

Post-calibration the RGB Balance and Gamma is almost perfect. The contrast ratio is only 736:1 but that isn’t much of a drop from the pre-calibration level of 769:1. Color errors are reduced, but as I’ll show here, that is only because the luminance levels are fixed. Unless a monitor has a 3D LUT, you cannot correct for over-saturation or tint errors in a display. Using an ICC profile and an ICC aware application you can fix some of those, but most applications are not ICC aware. Below you’ll see the color checker charts broken out into three different errors: Luminance, Color, and Hue. Color are Hue are what we cannot fix, while Luminance we can.

As we can see the DeltaL values are almost perfect now, but the DeltaC and DeltaH values are basically identical to before. Unless you have either ICC aware applications, or a monitor with a 3D LUT, this is all you’ll ever be able to do to correct a display. Grayscale and gamma improve, but a display needs to have accurate colors to be correct.

Targeting 80 cd/m2 now and the sRGB gamma curve we see similar results. The contrast ratio drops even more but that almost always happens. Colors have the same issues we’ve seen the whole time, with the DeltaL improving but not the Hue or Saturation.

Color accuracy on the Acer is okay but not fantastic. Since the pre-calibration numbers for colors are almost all below dE2000 levels of 3.0 most people will be fine with it. Many 4K displays to this point have had a focus on designers and photo editors, but the Acer is very much a gaming display, and in practice few gamers will really notice anything with the colors unless a display is really off, and that’s certainly not the case here.

Acer XB280HK: Brightness and Contrast Acer XB280HK: Display Uniformity
Comments Locked

69 Comments

View All Comments

  • DigitalFreak - Wednesday, January 28, 2015 - link

    Dell U3415W
  • DigitalFreak - Wednesday, January 28, 2015 - link

    If you look around for coupon codes, you should be able to get it for under $1000.
  • Frenetic Pony - Wednesday, January 28, 2015 - link

    G-Sync seems like a dead end anyway. It's both GPU vendor locked and more expensive than "Freesync" which is also part of an open standard.
  • eddman - Thursday, January 29, 2015 - link

    "No G-Sync, but I don't like being locked into a GPU vendor when I only replace my monitor every 5 years or so."

    That doesn't make sense. When did you buy your monitor? A year ago? You could've bought a G-sync monitor and enjoyed the syncing whenever you ended up with an nvidia card in your computer, but now you can't have either of them for a few more years anyway; unless you change your routine and replace your monitor too.
  • Narg - Friday, January 30, 2015 - link

    I easily hit 60fps on my 1440p monitor with only a GTX 970 on most games. Not sure why people spend so much on hardware at times.
  • IdBuRnS - Thursday, February 19, 2015 - link

    "I can also hit 60fps easily with GTX 980 SLI with all options maxed."

    Well I'd surely hope so...
  • Mondozai - Wednesday, January 28, 2015 - link

    Jarred, a quick note:
    "A solution to this might be G-SYNC to enable gaming that looks smooth even when running below 60Hz"

    That should be fps, not Hz, as the panel is at 60 Hz all the time.
  • paradeigmas - Wednesday, January 28, 2015 - link

    You do know the fundamentals of G-Sync is its ability to drop the refresh rate according to fps right? Which means if your game is running at 45fps, your G-Sync monitor will refresh at 45Hz.
  • Antronman - Wednesday, January 28, 2015 - link

    But the usage of the word "Hertz" is still incorrect.
  • JarredWalton - Wednesday, January 28, 2015 - link

    Fixed.

Log in

Don't have an account? Sign up now