Wi-Fi

The Latitude 12 5000 series that we received comes with the Intel Dual-Band Wireless-AC 7265 card, which is a 2x2:2 model that also does Bluetooth 4.0 LE. This is also the newer Intel AC card designed for low power usage over the older 7260, thus a prudent point that Dell is keeping up with the later iterations for better battery life. The specification sheet also lists a Dell Wireless 1707 card, which is a single band 802.11n model. Wireless AC is a big bump in performance, and dual-band is going to give you more options for wireless, so the single stream 802.11n version should be avoided if possible. Also optional is the Qualcomm Gobi 4G LTE wireless card, however that was not available on this review unit.

WiFi Performance - TCP

The 802.11ac card did not have the best connection speed. It would briefly connect at 867 Mpbs but then drop to 780 Mbps most of the time, even with the router in line of sight. Still, the performance was good and I was able to achieve 340 Mpbs over Wi-Fi. It is not the highest we have seen, but it is still a good result.

The E5250 is one of the rare laptops these days that also comes with an Ethernet port. File copies over the 1 Gbps connection resulted in 912 Mbps. Even with 802.11ac, there really is no substitute for a hard wired connection at this point. As the Latitude comes with a docking port, I would imagine most in-office scenarios would have the device docked for maximum performance.

Battery Life

For an office worker on the go, battery life can be critical. With the 1080p display, compared to some of the high-DPI displays we have tested, it should not require a very strong backlight by comparison. Add in the U series processor, and I was hoping for good battery life out of this laptop. The results speak for themselves.

Battery Life 2013 - Light

Over Wi-Fi, our standard web browsing battery test resulted in one of our longest results ever, despite there only being a 51 Wh battery. At 537 minutes, the E5250 comes in at just a hair under nine hours of browsing life. That is a great result. Only the Dell XPS 15 with a massive 91 Wh battery, and the MacBook Air with a 54 Wh battery beat the Dell, and only by a handful of minutes.

Battery Life 2013 - Heavy

For our heavy test, we ramp up the amount of pages loaded significantly, and add in a 1 MB/s file download and movie playback. Here the Dell scores 5 hours and 43 minutes of use. This is another good result, and only the HP Stream 11 with a 5 watt CPU outpaces the Dell. It gets an amazing one hour longer battery life in this test than the Yoga 2 Pro, which has almost the same CPU. The high DPI display in the Yoga 2 Pro clearly comes at a cost.

We also like to remove the battery size from the equation, to get a feeling for overall platform efficiency.

Battery Life 2013 - Light NormalizedBattery Life 2013 - Heavy Normalized

On the light test, the Latitude comes in pretty close to the top, but on the heavy test, there is a big jump over all of the other Haswell U series devices.

Charge Time

The other factor with battery life is how long it takes to charge. The Dell charges its 51 Wh battery at just 26 watts at the beginning of the cycle, and it trickles down to just a few watts when the device is almost full. This is likely in an effort to make the battery last longer.

Battery Charge Time

The E5250 is the slowest device to charge to 100% of all the devices we have tested so far. However, total time to 100% is only part of the story.

You can see that the Dell charges to almost 50% in only 40 minutes, and as it gets close to full it really slows down the charge rate. In fact, it takes about 30 minutes to go from 98% to 100%. So if you are on the go, you can charge fairly quickly as long as your battery is low.

Speakers

The Dell Latitude 12 comes with stereo speakers, but they are on the underside of the device. They are right at the front though, so assuming the laptop is on a desk, it is not too bad, but some sound level is going to be lost. As with most laptops, the speakers are going to be very small and will not have much of a chance to cover the entire hearing range.

The speakers on the Latitude 12 5000 are fairly impressive. Overall, I was able to hit around 87 dB playing music, but the frequency response is not too bad. Unlike some laptops I have tested, it can actually do sub 200 Hz sounds, although with some fall off of course. There are some harmonics at 150 Hz which spike the levels, but the overall abilities of these speakers is not too bad considering their size and location.

Noise

The E5250 is very quiet most of the time. The fan is basically inaudible unless heavy work is being done. Unlike some laptops, I have never heard the fan ramp up from basic web browsing or video playback, and the only time I heard it was during benchmarks.

Running Prime95 and Furmark to maximize the heat output, I could only get the fans to hit about 40 dB which is only 5 dB over the SPL floor in my room. This is with the Dell Power Command set to “Ultra Performance”. Running both a full CPU and full GPU stress test at the same times pushes the limits of the TDP though, with the CPU speed throttling to 1 GHz under sustained load.

Display Conclusion
Comments Locked

48 Comments

View All Comments

  • dsraa - Monday, January 19, 2015 - link

    I agree, the performance is ehh, or right in the middle, and styling is really basic and boring looking. I wouldn't buy this over HP or Acer's S7 which above this dell in almost every respect.
  • cwolf78 - Monday, January 19, 2015 - link

    Agree fully on this. The company I work for is going to the E7440's as their default laptop. We used the E6400, E6410, E6420, then E6430 before going to these. A dramatic leap forward in every aspect except performance (compared to the E6420/30). But the increased battery life, quite operation, and lighter weight are a good trade-off. The E7440 does have all around decent performance, but does tend to bog down with a lot of stuff open (especially CPU intensive tabs in Chrome). We're using the i5-4310U, 8 GB of RAM, and 14" 1080p IPS multi-touch screen.
  • cwolf78 - Monday, January 19, 2015 - link

    Ugh, wrong post >_<
  • angrypatm - Monday, January 19, 2015 - link

    Why the concern about styling, it is a machine/tool for the workplace, not a fashion statement. If it 's not the thinnest or shiniest, will you be looked at any differently by coworkers.
  • ZeDestructor - Monday, January 19, 2015 - link

    Yeah, but how are thermals on the HP> From what I've seen in recent years, HP machines across the range have had chronic, repeated issues with cooling, and either throttling or hitting TjMax and hard shutting down. To me, that makes the laptop design a complete failure.

    Seriously, make the laptops work well, reliably and cool before you style it up.

    Secondly, this is Dell's mid-range business line. If you want style, get an XPS13 instead. I for one much prefer having something that looks ugly and isn't prone to being stolen or even glanced at twice instead, plus, docking port, that works with the 2009 docks is a nice touch (Looking at you Lenovo, HP).
  • ABR - Monday, January 19, 2015 - link

    I sure wish PC manufacturers would start to put more emphasis on SSDs. As here, they aren't there by default, and the available options tend to be small and expensive. It feels like it's still five years ago. This is one area where I wish Apple's example were followed more widely.
  • nerd1 - Tuesday, January 20, 2015 - link

    Please stop drinking apple kool-aid. Every company now provide factory-installed SSD options and unlike apple they are standard size so you can put your 500GB SSD which was as low as $150 during last BF.
  • SuperVeloce - Monday, January 19, 2015 - link

    I agree if design allows for 16:10, they should use it. What I don't understand is why would you compare those dualcore HT laptops with mac retina quad in benchmarks...
  • Brett Howse - Monday, January 19, 2015 - link

    " I have included the Retina Macbook Pro and HP Stream 11 to bracket the scores with a higher wattage quad-core part and a low wattage Atom part"

    Just to give a performance example of something that is actually a quad-core part. I also included the Stream as a comparison of Haswell-U vs Atom.
  • nerd1 - Monday, January 19, 2015 - link

    It doesn't make any sense as rMBP 15" is totally different size, price and OS league. There are enough 13" laptops with qm CPU, or $800 laptop with qm cpu, or both.

Log in

Don't have an account? Sign up now