Camera - Still Pictures

Meizu's back shooter comes with a 20.7MP Sony IMX220 camera sensor together with a F/2.2 aperture, ISP 5-piece lens main camera. The sensor is a 1/2.3" format with 1.2µm sized pixels. There is no OIS or special AF functionality in the module, which makes this a more simplistic camera to examine.


1/50s ISO-40 f/2.2


1/50s ISO-40 f/2.2

In my cloudy December months the device was able to capture a good amount of detail thanks to the 20.7MP resolution of the sensor. I did notice that the camera tends to underexpose just a tad from reality, making pictures appear darker than they should be. Auto mode shooting during the day seems to like to default to 1/50s exposure on ISO-40. There is little noise in the pictures and shooting latency is good. However, when using HDR the device struggles as taking an HDR shot can take up to 3-4 seconds. I'm not sure what's wrong here but it seems Meizu isn't employing the sensor's HDR capabilities but falls back to software or ISP processing.


Location 1:
Location 2:

The differences in post-processing are especially visible when comparing a 100% crop to the likes of the Note 4. Although the Note has OIS, the major differences are to be found in the sharpening and saturation of colors. Again here it seems that Meizu doesn't employ a companion ISP that enables such post-processing.


1/10s ISO-1600 HDR (20MP)


1/25s ISO-2000 Night shot (5MP)

When switching over to night shots there is a conundrum of choice between using a slow but otherwise excellent quality HDR mode, or to switch over to a dedicated night shot mode. In the night shot mode it seems that the sensor is employing pixel binning as maximum resolution is limited to just 5MP. The resulting picture loses a lot of detail and sharpness but capture time is excellent and allows for quick shooting in darkness.


Normal mode:
HDR:

Trying to shoot in darkness in the normal mode is a futile exercise as the camera simply isn't able to cope and will result in underexposed shots. In my everyday usage I found the night shot mode to have too great of a picture quality sacrifice due to the 1/4 resolution limitation, so HDR is the only viable alternative. The Meizu still manages to provide very good image results for a non-OIS shooter and leaves the likes of the Honor 6 and Mate 7 in the dust when it comes to night-time shooting.

Lastly the panorama function was severely disappointing, as the phone couldn't hold a steady exposure and there is obvious stitching in the resulting 14512x2464 image. There is also significant motion blur throughout the image. I panned relatively slowly when taking the panorama so such a result is disappointing.

Overall I think the still camera performance of the Meizu MX4 Pro is solid. It's possible to take excellent quality pictures in bright conditions, and shooting in the dark works provided you're willing to sacrifice resolution. While image quality is not comparable to OIS devices, the MX4 Pro outperforms every other competing device in detail and quality. The one area of concern is the slow HDR mode as the processing time is excessive and disrupts fast camera usage.

Camera - Video Recording


2160p30

Note 4 Exynos reference: [ 2160p30 ]

The MX4 Pro supports 4K video recording at 30fps. The camera produces a 32.6Mbps H.264 High Profile 5.1 video stream together with stereo 96Kbps AAC audio in an MP4 format. The image quality produced is quite good; the YouTube re-encode doesn't do it justice as a lot of detail is lost. It's the lack of OIS and any EIS in this 4K video mode that is most disappointing, as trying to capture a video while moving becomes a shaky mess. A 30 second video sample comes in at a massive 120MB. There is no limit on recording length, but it's quite possible to quickly fill up the internal storage space of the device at such a rate.


1080p30​

Note 4 Exynos reference: [ 1080p30 , 1080p30+EIS , 1080p60 , 1080p60+HDR ]

When moving over to 1080p there is a sudden change in picture tone as all colors get much more saturated. What seems to be happening here is that there is actual post-processing done in the 1080p stream. I think this may be related to ISP performance not being able to cope with the 4K stream. It seems because of either this post-processing or because the sensor isn't capturing at its full resolution that there is a large and discernable loss of detail. The video stream bitrate goes down to 18Mbps in the FHD mode.


720p30​

Note 4 Exynos reference: [ 720p30 , 720p30+EIS ]

 

At 720p there is finally some kind of EIS being enabled on the device, as the stock camera application doesn't provide any manual controls for enabling or disabling EIS. What is curious is that the video stream only drops to 16Mbps compared to 1080p's 18Mbps bitrate, making for better image quality in moving subjects. Again we're seeing a significant loss of detail and I can even start seeing chromatic aberrations on contrasted edges such as the tree branches.


720p100 Slow Motion​

Meizu offers a separate camera mode that is essentially a 100fps slow motion recording mode in 720p resolution. I found it odd that the resulting video file's meta-data retains the real-time video recording length instead of the actual playback length. The above sample video contains a 20 second capture time that is stretched to a video playback time of little over 80 seconds, meaning we're recording at 4x slow motion.

The MX4 Pro's video recording capabilities remain borderline satisfactory due to the lack of a more effective EIS implementation. The 4K mode is definitely the most impressive due to the amount of detail that is being retained from the sensor, but it's hampered by storage space due to the lack of a microSD card.

Battery Life & Charge Time Conclusion
Comments Locked

70 Comments

View All Comments

  • aryonoco - Monday, February 16, 2015 - link

    As much as I appreciate your in-depth analysis of SoC, power usage and displays Andrei, your taste in UI really baffles me.

    That is the most hideous, disjointed, inexplicably redundant UI I have ever seen on an Android device, and you seem to like it. I'm simply astounded that you like this everything-and-the-kitchen-sink approach that many Chinese OEMs employ in regards to their ROMs. Brian and Anand knew that every additional UI feature comes with a cost, and it's a matter of finding the sweet spot. This point seems to be totally lost on you.

    As an occasional Android developer, I would hate to think what Play Store reviews would look like if phones like this, with their ability to revoke permissions from apps and for users to break apps without realising that they have done so, would look like. Thankfully, no OEM which actually provides customer care support is going to implement this in a Western country, as the support cost is going to be enormous.

    I really don't mean to sound disrespectful, but I'd love for Andrei to limit himself to hardware discussion in future Android devices (in which he is extremely skilled), and leave the UX review for someone with a bit more, shall I say, taste
  • Andrei Frumusanu - Monday, February 16, 2015 - link

    I'm reviewing for the user, not for the OEM. In my opinion Android suffers a lot from Adware and misbehaving apps that such permission managers are a pure benefit to the user as already commented by some others here.

    I have experience in software UI design and user interaction, so while you might disagree with me I see plenty of other people who find Meizu's new UI equally attractive.
  • overseer - Monday, February 23, 2015 - link

    To me Flyme OS has a homescreen with icons ugly as Quasimodo's face and so 2010, but the rest of interfaces (settings, notifications, etc) look strangely okay and taste somewhat close to Lollipop. This is a huge disparity in design practices and keeps me wondering if Meizu's UI designers hold a paranoiac love over that homescreen or they kind of hit a temporary ceilling in their professional competency. I would've taken the plunge for MX4 months ago had I not seen their everlasting homescreen. *_*
  • samflorin - Tuesday, February 17, 2015 - link

    @aryonoco cm11S for One+ called, would like a word on the built in permission manager.
  • ffsmaster - Tuesday, February 17, 2015 - link

    It is a pity that this review does not include the audio system: ES9018K2M+OPA1612.
  • Andrei Frumusanu - Tuesday, February 17, 2015 - link

    I just didn't have anything to write about it. It sounds good? Without proper equipment as in the iPhone 6 review audio testing has become futile.
  • vanguardkl - Wednesday, September 28, 2016 - link

    This. I'm coming back here in Sept 2016 just to say this. This phone is 1.5 years old - has a 2k screen. HD HiFi audio DAC - most people have to spend $100 just to buy this separately - among the best specs seen on any phone - and costs $150 now. I'm buying one as soon as I can - there's nothing that comes close to this value. This phone is a diamond in the rough, and once people know about its gonna be snapped up.. Hopefully this comment stays in the dirt. I have a Meizu M1 Note which I got for $125 and its next to perfect with 1080p screen and all. They provide MONTHLY updates to the OS and improvements all the time. Amazing I'm so happy with Meizu and hopefully they remain buried under the news headlines and I can pick up these phones for cheap.
  • loimlo - Thursday, February 19, 2015 - link

    Nice job! Well-written review!! How about other Chinese vendors like Xiaomi, Oppo, Vivo ?
    I've been using Redmi for a year and am very fond of it. Solid HW/SW given its humble pricing.
  • Hrushi - Thursday, August 6, 2015 - link

    It is surprising to see that anandtech have missed on detailed audio quality analysis even when device have boasted this feature.
  • inguru - Thursday, July 21, 2016 - link

    Brother if you are really considering this to buy please be sure. Coz if something happens you cant fix this one. They have this digital security locked to its mainboard which you will not able to overwrite. No flashtool no ADB no fastboot what ever you try it will never be fixed & they are very dictating by saying send the phone to them but at the time you will b out of warranty and no place you will be able to go to bring it back. Its a dictatorship company. Be aware... you will never want to be in this situation

Log in

Don't have an account? Sign up now