Camera - Still Pictures

Meizu's back shooter comes with a 20.7MP Sony IMX220 camera sensor together with a F/2.2 aperture, ISP 5-piece lens main camera. The sensor is a 1/2.3" format with 1.2µm sized pixels. There is no OIS or special AF functionality in the module, which makes this a more simplistic camera to examine.


1/50s ISO-40 f/2.2


1/50s ISO-40 f/2.2

In my cloudy December months the device was able to capture a good amount of detail thanks to the 20.7MP resolution of the sensor. I did notice that the camera tends to underexpose just a tad from reality, making pictures appear darker than they should be. Auto mode shooting during the day seems to like to default to 1/50s exposure on ISO-40. There is little noise in the pictures and shooting latency is good. However, when using HDR the device struggles as taking an HDR shot can take up to 3-4 seconds. I'm not sure what's wrong here but it seems Meizu isn't employing the sensor's HDR capabilities but falls back to software or ISP processing.


Location 1:
Location 2:

The differences in post-processing are especially visible when comparing a 100% crop to the likes of the Note 4. Although the Note has OIS, the major differences are to be found in the sharpening and saturation of colors. Again here it seems that Meizu doesn't employ a companion ISP that enables such post-processing.


1/10s ISO-1600 HDR (20MP)


1/25s ISO-2000 Night shot (5MP)

When switching over to night shots there is a conundrum of choice between using a slow but otherwise excellent quality HDR mode, or to switch over to a dedicated night shot mode. In the night shot mode it seems that the sensor is employing pixel binning as maximum resolution is limited to just 5MP. The resulting picture loses a lot of detail and sharpness but capture time is excellent and allows for quick shooting in darkness.


Normal mode:
HDR:

Trying to shoot in darkness in the normal mode is a futile exercise as the camera simply isn't able to cope and will result in underexposed shots. In my everyday usage I found the night shot mode to have too great of a picture quality sacrifice due to the 1/4 resolution limitation, so HDR is the only viable alternative. The Meizu still manages to provide very good image results for a non-OIS shooter and leaves the likes of the Honor 6 and Mate 7 in the dust when it comes to night-time shooting.

Lastly the panorama function was severely disappointing, as the phone couldn't hold a steady exposure and there is obvious stitching in the resulting 14512x2464 image. There is also significant motion blur throughout the image. I panned relatively slowly when taking the panorama so such a result is disappointing.

Overall I think the still camera performance of the Meizu MX4 Pro is solid. It's possible to take excellent quality pictures in bright conditions, and shooting in the dark works provided you're willing to sacrifice resolution. While image quality is not comparable to OIS devices, the MX4 Pro outperforms every other competing device in detail and quality. The one area of concern is the slow HDR mode as the processing time is excessive and disrupts fast camera usage.

Camera - Video Recording


2160p30

Note 4 Exynos reference: [ 2160p30 ]

The MX4 Pro supports 4K video recording at 30fps. The camera produces a 32.6Mbps H.264 High Profile 5.1 video stream together with stereo 96Kbps AAC audio in an MP4 format. The image quality produced is quite good; the YouTube re-encode doesn't do it justice as a lot of detail is lost. It's the lack of OIS and any EIS in this 4K video mode that is most disappointing, as trying to capture a video while moving becomes a shaky mess. A 30 second video sample comes in at a massive 120MB. There is no limit on recording length, but it's quite possible to quickly fill up the internal storage space of the device at such a rate.


1080p30​

Note 4 Exynos reference: [ 1080p30 , 1080p30+EIS , 1080p60 , 1080p60+HDR ]

When moving over to 1080p there is a sudden change in picture tone as all colors get much more saturated. What seems to be happening here is that there is actual post-processing done in the 1080p stream. I think this may be related to ISP performance not being able to cope with the 4K stream. It seems because of either this post-processing or because the sensor isn't capturing at its full resolution that there is a large and discernable loss of detail. The video stream bitrate goes down to 18Mbps in the FHD mode.


720p30​

Note 4 Exynos reference: [ 720p30 , 720p30+EIS ]

 

At 720p there is finally some kind of EIS being enabled on the device, as the stock camera application doesn't provide any manual controls for enabling or disabling EIS. What is curious is that the video stream only drops to 16Mbps compared to 1080p's 18Mbps bitrate, making for better image quality in moving subjects. Again we're seeing a significant loss of detail and I can even start seeing chromatic aberrations on contrasted edges such as the tree branches.


720p100 Slow Motion​

Meizu offers a separate camera mode that is essentially a 100fps slow motion recording mode in 720p resolution. I found it odd that the resulting video file's meta-data retains the real-time video recording length instead of the actual playback length. The above sample video contains a 20 second capture time that is stretched to a video playback time of little over 80 seconds, meaning we're recording at 4x slow motion.

The MX4 Pro's video recording capabilities remain borderline satisfactory due to the lack of a more effective EIS implementation. The 4K mode is definitely the most impressive due to the amount of detail that is being retained from the sensor, but it's hampered by storage space due to the lack of a microSD card.

Battery Life & Charge Time Conclusion
Comments Locked

70 Comments

View All Comments

  • velanapontinha - Tuesday, May 26, 2015 - link

    Hi, Andrew.

    Any ETA on the review of the "regular" MX4? MWC is long over.
    AnandTech still doesn't have one single review to a Mediatek based device. Mediatek is no longer a Cyrix kind of thing, you guys should give it the spotlight it is starting to deserve.
  • pjcamp - Monday, February 16, 2015 - link

    I'm baffled at how you guys can find time to review these obscure Chinese knock-off phones, but apparently can't manage to review a Sony.
  • techcrazy - Monday, February 16, 2015 - link

    It's Sony's fault. Andrei asked for a review unit but it looks like they didn't provide any review unit.
    http://www.anandtech.com/show/8655/the-huawei-asce... . Look at the comment section.
  • sonny73n - Wednesday, February 18, 2015 - link

    Sony would never dare to let an unbiased tech site like AT to review their devices. Sony devices may look nice but if you take in depth approach into them, you'll surely be disappointed. Take a few flagships Sony has released just a couple of years back for examples - the ZR, ZL and Z1, all were made with TFT panels. And the recent Z3C isn't so good either - with so many reports of self-cracked front and back glass. Need I say more?
  • notposting - Monday, February 16, 2015 - link

    Regarding the plastic insets on the metal band -- aren't those generally used to separate discrete external antenna bands (like the iPhone 4 and so on)?
  • xaueious - Monday, February 16, 2015 - link

    The review is not really useful without reviewing the Marvell baseband
  • Submano - Monday, February 16, 2015 - link

    Great review as the one with the Note 4 Exynos! On a side note, are you Andrei Lux from XDA? Cheers
  • cjs150 - Monday, February 16, 2015 - link

    I think I can answer the question why phone makers omit the microSD (and tablet makers).

    It is so they can rip the customer off by massively overcharging for additional memory. A 64Gb MicroSD card costs c. £25 whereas upgrading Nexus 6 from 32Gb to 64Gb costs £90 (Iphone 6 16G to 64G is an extra £80), tablets are the same.
  • PC Perv - Monday, February 16, 2015 - link

    I really appreciate the power consumption section. I totally agree with you that we need some legitimate methodology for batter performance under mobile data (esp. LTE) Literally everyone experiences different battery performance using same devices because of different signal quality.

    I think it would be very helpful if you explain in a separate article as to when/how/why battery drains using mobile data? Are their differences between carriers? Or is it spectrum-bound? How much signal strength matter? Etc.

    I also appreciate that you went a length to experiment with the power saving modes. A lot of people seem to use power saving mode without knowing what it does, hoping their devices last longer. Not only you gave us explanation on this phone's implementation but you also measured the efficiency of it - It is something I want to know in many phone reviews but reviews never explored it. I cannot thank you enough.

    Keep up the good work!
  • croc - Monday, February 16, 2015 - link

    Lesseeee... Known taps into every comms link going through the USA, and you are wondering if a China-made device has a backdoor? You have a strange set of priorities, my friend...

Log in

Don't have an account? Sign up now