Conclusion

The Meizu MX4 Pro is certainly an interesting device. There is no doubt that most readers will consider the most characterizing facet of the device the fact that this is a phone by a Chinese manufacturer who has yet to make a reputation for itself in the western markets. Trying to diverge from the well-known formula by employing a more radical customization of Android, Meizu nevertheless manages to put out a very solid product.

FlymeOS, while still lacking polish and distinguishing functional features, still manages to serve as a good OEM skin. The stock launcher is definitely the weak point but doesn't hinder the user from easily installing 3rd party software to get the application drawer back. I'm happy with Meizu's permission manager and see it as an important addition to the core OS that cannot be easily reproduced by other means. The interface is clean and the design language is attractive. Translation mishaps here and there are being progressively fixed by the continuous updates that the phone seems to receive since I got the sample unit. It's Meizu's services and ecosystem that need a more drastic effort as they completely lack even basic English support.

In terms of phone hardware, the MX4 Pro really seems to shine. The semi-metal build is extremely solid and gives an excellent premium feel to it, without having to sacrifice too much weight or texture due to the plastic back that in my opinion is well suited for the device. However, I miss the microSD card slot and given the device's internal build and I really wonder why Meizu chose to omit it.

Meizu's fingerprint sensor implementation works just as well as Apple's, and due to the dual-function as both mechanical home-button and capacitive function key brings a new way of navigation that, at least in theory, seems improved over previous Meizu models.

Meizu's choice of continuing with Samsung's line of SoCs is no disadvantage compared to the competition. The Exynos 5430 will probably remain as the most power efficient SoC of the existing A15 generation. A57 SoCs are just around the corner and one may question the choice of going forward with the purchase of a last-generation architecture device, but I've proven that in terms of perf/W the Exynos 5430 leads the newer generation 5433. Unfortunately, the raw performance of the SoC is often wasted by poor software optimizations in the OS. If you're running non-native applications, you might not see the full potential of the hardware. I hope an eventual Lollipop update will fix these issues.

It's on the GPU side that performance may not be totally satisfactory due to the Mali T628MP6. Here a more robust GPU such as the Adreno 420 found in the Snapdragon 805 would have been a better fit for the QHD screen.

When it comes to the MX4 Pro's display, the 5.46" JDI panel is a double-edged sword. Delivering excellent maximum brightness and amazing low-light night reading modes at the same time, and the outstanding sharpness of the 1536p 546PPI resolution, are feats that could be overshadowed by the inaccurate and oversaturated colors of the default calibration that Meizu decided to employ. In terms of screen size, I think Meizu hit the upper limit of the sweet-spot for one-handed use as the sloping sides make for a very comfortable one-handed grip of the phone.

The choice of SoC, efficient display, and a large 3350mAh battery make for remarkable battery life on the Meizu. Gaming may get a little bit hot due to the GPU, but other everyday usage easily competes with top-performing devices.

The camera performs well, but don't expect it to quite reach the quality of OIS contenders such as the G3, Note 4, or iPhone 6 Plus. Compared to what the Huawei offered in the Honor 6 and Mate 7, there is however a noticeable improvement in quality.

A big detractor is the cellular network support. If you live in North America, you will not get LTE support. Europeans will be more lucky to see either 1800 or 2600MHz band support on their carriers. Until Meizu specifically targets a model with more global band support, this will remain a unit that is best served on the Chinese mainland. It is a pity as the Marvell modem seems to behave quite well in my subjective usage.

When it comes to deciding whether the MX4 Pro is worth buying, again it comes down to price. The device can be found through various web-shops internationally starting at $499 or ~380€ for the 32GB model, with the 16GB going for even less. I think Meizu hits a reasonable performance/price level that makes the MX4 Pro a more attractive choice than competing devices at its level. The Nexus 6 and Mate 7 both under-perform in everything but software and sheer screen size, while the Note 4 or iPhone 6 vastly out-price the Meizu putting them in a different category. Overall, if you can make due with the LTE bands, I think the MX4 Pro is a solid phone that is worth considering.

Camera - Still Pictures and Video performance
Comments Locked

70 Comments

View All Comments

  • jjj - Monday, February 16, 2015 - link

    I have doubts that Xiaomi still aims to make great value products and the likely Redmi Note 2 might be 720p and SSD615 but we shall see. Xiaomi or not there are a few similar devices already anyway, some even cheaper ,the only big name for matching the m1 Note now being TCL.
    As for A53, it is a small core , from a cost perspective it's normal to be well priced. Perf wise it is nice, for us consumers.
  • getbacktosrinu - Monday, February 16, 2015 - link

    How come Anandtech is reviewing a Meizu, and is not reviewing phones from Sony, a much bigger brand and one of the bigger players in the international smartphone market?

    Why not look at the Xperia Z3 and the Z3 Compact and dig in to find out how Sony is extracting "2 - day battery life" purportedly?
  • jjj - Monday, February 16, 2015 - link

    To be fair Sony is barely in top 10 smartphone makers - Samsung, Apple, Huawei, Lenovo, LG, Xiaomi , Coolpad , BBK (OPPO and Vivo are ahead of them and Sony fights with ZTE and TCL for the last 2 spots in top 10 - and they might sell the phone division by this time next year. Plus those devices are not exactly fresh. Meizu could be one of the next tech giants and they would likely overtake Sony in units in 2016 if not this year.At least this device is a bit different than the standard 1080p, SD80x and so on.that gets rather boring and offers little surprises.
  • TT Masterzz - Monday, February 16, 2015 - link

    Shouldn't Lenovo be the third largest after they acquired Motorola and also I believe Xiaomi is fifth and LG is sixth. Although I am not sure about that
  • TT Masterzz - Monday, February 16, 2015 - link

    Also if we go by your logic of units shipped then I believe there should be no reason for AT to review One Plus One right ?.
  • jjj - Monday, February 16, 2015 - link

    Well you kinda overextend what i was saying but there is no logic for AT to not review devices from major phone makers that it currently ignores. OPO in the end shipped little so yeah there isn't all that much of a reason to review it. However it did ship to lots of enthusiasts and AT was about PC enthusiasts not mainstream so from that perspective it makes more sense to review the OPO than S6 or the iphone.
    As for phone makers rankings, i wasn't trying to list them in Q4 order or 2014 order. Lenovo has bought Moto but they had only 2 months of Moto sales in 2014 and they are not growing all that fast. Huawei shipped some 75 million units in 2014 so they were 3rd for sure and at this point the most likely to be third in 2015 as they expand the Honor line to more markets.
    Anyway, in 2015 Huawei , Lenovo and Xiaomi are likely to fight for the 3rd spot with Lenovo the least likely to get it and LG could drop a few spots but that depends on their strategy .Some China guys might get in trouble this year too , HTC and Sony might have to sell so maybe we see some mergers and the rankings change a bit.
  • TT Masterzz - Wednesday, February 18, 2015 - link

    I agree on the latter part of your comment. The Chinese market seems to be approaching saturation and inevitably this would mean the death of certain small scale Chinese manufacturers who had till now been surviving on the enormous growth rate China had. Although I beg to differ that smartphones like S6 and iPhone 6/6+ are not used by enthusiasts. Even Sony smartphones are used by enthusiasts in my opinion. Plus if AT were to only review gadgets that appeal to tech savvy users then why ignore Xiaomi products. Xiaomi's "almost" zero marketing and online flash sales pretty much guarantees that only tech enthusiasts use their smartphones. Xiaomi's volume also is much higher than One Plus. I guess the best way to put it is that AT reviews devices at their whims and fancies. Cheers :)
  • Gemuk - Monday, February 16, 2015 - link

    AT have always parroted the "we only review stuff that the manufacturer sends us" line which I just find lazy. What's so hard in actually buying the stuff, and then sell it after they're done? Heck they can even use their own forums to do so. Surely the increased revenue would be more than enough to cover the $50-100 expense?
  • TT Masterzz - Monday, February 16, 2015 - link

    They don't need to do that also. For example for the Galaxy Note 4 review the device was provided by 28mobiles.com I believe. Why can't they borrow a Sony or Xiaomi unit from 28mobiles.com and drop by a sponsored line for them. I am sure 28mobiles.com would consider providing a device if they can get a name on a website like AT.
  • piroroadkill - Monday, February 16, 2015 - link

    Yeah, it's very, very odd. Z3 Compact is STILL the best phone on the market, in my opinion.

Log in

Don't have an account? Sign up now