Camera - Still Pictures

Meizu's back shooter comes with a 20.7MP Sony IMX220 camera sensor together with a F/2.2 aperture, ISP 5-piece lens main camera. The sensor is a 1/2.3" format with 1.2µm sized pixels. There is no OIS or special AF functionality in the module, which makes this a more simplistic camera to examine.


1/50s ISO-40 f/2.2


1/50s ISO-40 f/2.2

In my cloudy December months the device was able to capture a good amount of detail thanks to the 20.7MP resolution of the sensor. I did notice that the camera tends to underexpose just a tad from reality, making pictures appear darker than they should be. Auto mode shooting during the day seems to like to default to 1/50s exposure on ISO-40. There is little noise in the pictures and shooting latency is good. However, when using HDR the device struggles as taking an HDR shot can take up to 3-4 seconds. I'm not sure what's wrong here but it seems Meizu isn't employing the sensor's HDR capabilities but falls back to software or ISP processing.


Location 1:
Location 2:

The differences in post-processing are especially visible when comparing a 100% crop to the likes of the Note 4. Although the Note has OIS, the major differences are to be found in the sharpening and saturation of colors. Again here it seems that Meizu doesn't employ a companion ISP that enables such post-processing.


1/10s ISO-1600 HDR (20MP)


1/25s ISO-2000 Night shot (5MP)

When switching over to night shots there is a conundrum of choice between using a slow but otherwise excellent quality HDR mode, or to switch over to a dedicated night shot mode. In the night shot mode it seems that the sensor is employing pixel binning as maximum resolution is limited to just 5MP. The resulting picture loses a lot of detail and sharpness but capture time is excellent and allows for quick shooting in darkness.


Normal mode:
HDR:

Trying to shoot in darkness in the normal mode is a futile exercise as the camera simply isn't able to cope and will result in underexposed shots. In my everyday usage I found the night shot mode to have too great of a picture quality sacrifice due to the 1/4 resolution limitation, so HDR is the only viable alternative. The Meizu still manages to provide very good image results for a non-OIS shooter and leaves the likes of the Honor 6 and Mate 7 in the dust when it comes to night-time shooting.

Lastly the panorama function was severely disappointing, as the phone couldn't hold a steady exposure and there is obvious stitching in the resulting 14512x2464 image. There is also significant motion blur throughout the image. I panned relatively slowly when taking the panorama so such a result is disappointing.

Overall I think the still camera performance of the Meizu MX4 Pro is solid. It's possible to take excellent quality pictures in bright conditions, and shooting in the dark works provided you're willing to sacrifice resolution. While image quality is not comparable to OIS devices, the MX4 Pro outperforms every other competing device in detail and quality. The one area of concern is the slow HDR mode as the processing time is excessive and disrupts fast camera usage.

Camera - Video Recording


2160p30

Note 4 Exynos reference: [ 2160p30 ]

The MX4 Pro supports 4K video recording at 30fps. The camera produces a 32.6Mbps H.264 High Profile 5.1 video stream together with stereo 96Kbps AAC audio in an MP4 format. The image quality produced is quite good; the YouTube re-encode doesn't do it justice as a lot of detail is lost. It's the lack of OIS and any EIS in this 4K video mode that is most disappointing, as trying to capture a video while moving becomes a shaky mess. A 30 second video sample comes in at a massive 120MB. There is no limit on recording length, but it's quite possible to quickly fill up the internal storage space of the device at such a rate.


1080p30​

Note 4 Exynos reference: [ 1080p30 , 1080p30+EIS , 1080p60 , 1080p60+HDR ]

When moving over to 1080p there is a sudden change in picture tone as all colors get much more saturated. What seems to be happening here is that there is actual post-processing done in the 1080p stream. I think this may be related to ISP performance not being able to cope with the 4K stream. It seems because of either this post-processing or because the sensor isn't capturing at its full resolution that there is a large and discernable loss of detail. The video stream bitrate goes down to 18Mbps in the FHD mode.


720p30​

Note 4 Exynos reference: [ 720p30 , 720p30+EIS ]

 

At 720p there is finally some kind of EIS being enabled on the device, as the stock camera application doesn't provide any manual controls for enabling or disabling EIS. What is curious is that the video stream only drops to 16Mbps compared to 1080p's 18Mbps bitrate, making for better image quality in moving subjects. Again we're seeing a significant loss of detail and I can even start seeing chromatic aberrations on contrasted edges such as the tree branches.


720p100 Slow Motion​

Meizu offers a separate camera mode that is essentially a 100fps slow motion recording mode in 720p resolution. I found it odd that the resulting video file's meta-data retains the real-time video recording length instead of the actual playback length. The above sample video contains a 20 second capture time that is stretched to a video playback time of little over 80 seconds, meaning we're recording at 4x slow motion.

The MX4 Pro's video recording capabilities remain borderline satisfactory due to the lack of a more effective EIS implementation. The 4K mode is definitely the most impressive due to the amount of detail that is being retained from the sensor, but it's hampered by storage space due to the lack of a microSD card.

Battery Life & Charge Time Conclusion
Comments Locked

70 Comments

View All Comments

  • jjj - Monday, February 16, 2015 - link

    I have doubts that Xiaomi still aims to make great value products and the likely Redmi Note 2 might be 720p and SSD615 but we shall see. Xiaomi or not there are a few similar devices already anyway, some even cheaper ,the only big name for matching the m1 Note now being TCL.
    As for A53, it is a small core , from a cost perspective it's normal to be well priced. Perf wise it is nice, for us consumers.
  • getbacktosrinu - Monday, February 16, 2015 - link

    How come Anandtech is reviewing a Meizu, and is not reviewing phones from Sony, a much bigger brand and one of the bigger players in the international smartphone market?

    Why not look at the Xperia Z3 and the Z3 Compact and dig in to find out how Sony is extracting "2 - day battery life" purportedly?
  • jjj - Monday, February 16, 2015 - link

    To be fair Sony is barely in top 10 smartphone makers - Samsung, Apple, Huawei, Lenovo, LG, Xiaomi , Coolpad , BBK (OPPO and Vivo are ahead of them and Sony fights with ZTE and TCL for the last 2 spots in top 10 - and they might sell the phone division by this time next year. Plus those devices are not exactly fresh. Meizu could be one of the next tech giants and they would likely overtake Sony in units in 2016 if not this year.At least this device is a bit different than the standard 1080p, SD80x and so on.that gets rather boring and offers little surprises.
  • TT Masterzz - Monday, February 16, 2015 - link

    Shouldn't Lenovo be the third largest after they acquired Motorola and also I believe Xiaomi is fifth and LG is sixth. Although I am not sure about that
  • TT Masterzz - Monday, February 16, 2015 - link

    Also if we go by your logic of units shipped then I believe there should be no reason for AT to review One Plus One right ?.
  • jjj - Monday, February 16, 2015 - link

    Well you kinda overextend what i was saying but there is no logic for AT to not review devices from major phone makers that it currently ignores. OPO in the end shipped little so yeah there isn't all that much of a reason to review it. However it did ship to lots of enthusiasts and AT was about PC enthusiasts not mainstream so from that perspective it makes more sense to review the OPO than S6 or the iphone.
    As for phone makers rankings, i wasn't trying to list them in Q4 order or 2014 order. Lenovo has bought Moto but they had only 2 months of Moto sales in 2014 and they are not growing all that fast. Huawei shipped some 75 million units in 2014 so they were 3rd for sure and at this point the most likely to be third in 2015 as they expand the Honor line to more markets.
    Anyway, in 2015 Huawei , Lenovo and Xiaomi are likely to fight for the 3rd spot with Lenovo the least likely to get it and LG could drop a few spots but that depends on their strategy .Some China guys might get in trouble this year too , HTC and Sony might have to sell so maybe we see some mergers and the rankings change a bit.
  • TT Masterzz - Wednesday, February 18, 2015 - link

    I agree on the latter part of your comment. The Chinese market seems to be approaching saturation and inevitably this would mean the death of certain small scale Chinese manufacturers who had till now been surviving on the enormous growth rate China had. Although I beg to differ that smartphones like S6 and iPhone 6/6+ are not used by enthusiasts. Even Sony smartphones are used by enthusiasts in my opinion. Plus if AT were to only review gadgets that appeal to tech savvy users then why ignore Xiaomi products. Xiaomi's "almost" zero marketing and online flash sales pretty much guarantees that only tech enthusiasts use their smartphones. Xiaomi's volume also is much higher than One Plus. I guess the best way to put it is that AT reviews devices at their whims and fancies. Cheers :)
  • Gemuk - Monday, February 16, 2015 - link

    AT have always parroted the "we only review stuff that the manufacturer sends us" line which I just find lazy. What's so hard in actually buying the stuff, and then sell it after they're done? Heck they can even use their own forums to do so. Surely the increased revenue would be more than enough to cover the $50-100 expense?
  • TT Masterzz - Monday, February 16, 2015 - link

    They don't need to do that also. For example for the Galaxy Note 4 review the device was provided by 28mobiles.com I believe. Why can't they borrow a Sony or Xiaomi unit from 28mobiles.com and drop by a sponsored line for them. I am sure 28mobiles.com would consider providing a device if they can get a name on a website like AT.
  • piroroadkill - Monday, February 16, 2015 - link

    Yeah, it's very, very odd. Z3 Compact is STILL the best phone on the market, in my opinion.

Log in

Don't have an account? Sign up now