Camera - Still Pictures

Meizu's back shooter comes with a 20.7MP Sony IMX220 camera sensor together with a F/2.2 aperture, ISP 5-piece lens main camera. The sensor is a 1/2.3" format with 1.2µm sized pixels. There is no OIS or special AF functionality in the module, which makes this a more simplistic camera to examine.


1/50s ISO-40 f/2.2


1/50s ISO-40 f/2.2

In my cloudy December months the device was able to capture a good amount of detail thanks to the 20.7MP resolution of the sensor. I did notice that the camera tends to underexpose just a tad from reality, making pictures appear darker than they should be. Auto mode shooting during the day seems to like to default to 1/50s exposure on ISO-40. There is little noise in the pictures and shooting latency is good. However, when using HDR the device struggles as taking an HDR shot can take up to 3-4 seconds. I'm not sure what's wrong here but it seems Meizu isn't employing the sensor's HDR capabilities but falls back to software or ISP processing.


Location 1:
Location 2:

The differences in post-processing are especially visible when comparing a 100% crop to the likes of the Note 4. Although the Note has OIS, the major differences are to be found in the sharpening and saturation of colors. Again here it seems that Meizu doesn't employ a companion ISP that enables such post-processing.


1/10s ISO-1600 HDR (20MP)


1/25s ISO-2000 Night shot (5MP)

When switching over to night shots there is a conundrum of choice between using a slow but otherwise excellent quality HDR mode, or to switch over to a dedicated night shot mode. In the night shot mode it seems that the sensor is employing pixel binning as maximum resolution is limited to just 5MP. The resulting picture loses a lot of detail and sharpness but capture time is excellent and allows for quick shooting in darkness.


Normal mode:
HDR:

Trying to shoot in darkness in the normal mode is a futile exercise as the camera simply isn't able to cope and will result in underexposed shots. In my everyday usage I found the night shot mode to have too great of a picture quality sacrifice due to the 1/4 resolution limitation, so HDR is the only viable alternative. The Meizu still manages to provide very good image results for a non-OIS shooter and leaves the likes of the Honor 6 and Mate 7 in the dust when it comes to night-time shooting.

Lastly the panorama function was severely disappointing, as the phone couldn't hold a steady exposure and there is obvious stitching in the resulting 14512x2464 image. There is also significant motion blur throughout the image. I panned relatively slowly when taking the panorama so such a result is disappointing.

Overall I think the still camera performance of the Meizu MX4 Pro is solid. It's possible to take excellent quality pictures in bright conditions, and shooting in the dark works provided you're willing to sacrifice resolution. While image quality is not comparable to OIS devices, the MX4 Pro outperforms every other competing device in detail and quality. The one area of concern is the slow HDR mode as the processing time is excessive and disrupts fast camera usage.

Camera - Video Recording


2160p30

Note 4 Exynos reference: [ 2160p30 ]

The MX4 Pro supports 4K video recording at 30fps. The camera produces a 32.6Mbps H.264 High Profile 5.1 video stream together with stereo 96Kbps AAC audio in an MP4 format. The image quality produced is quite good; the YouTube re-encode doesn't do it justice as a lot of detail is lost. It's the lack of OIS and any EIS in this 4K video mode that is most disappointing, as trying to capture a video while moving becomes a shaky mess. A 30 second video sample comes in at a massive 120MB. There is no limit on recording length, but it's quite possible to quickly fill up the internal storage space of the device at such a rate.


1080p30​

Note 4 Exynos reference: [ 1080p30 , 1080p30+EIS , 1080p60 , 1080p60+HDR ]

When moving over to 1080p there is a sudden change in picture tone as all colors get much more saturated. What seems to be happening here is that there is actual post-processing done in the 1080p stream. I think this may be related to ISP performance not being able to cope with the 4K stream. It seems because of either this post-processing or because the sensor isn't capturing at its full resolution that there is a large and discernable loss of detail. The video stream bitrate goes down to 18Mbps in the FHD mode.


720p30​

Note 4 Exynos reference: [ 720p30 , 720p30+EIS ]

 

At 720p there is finally some kind of EIS being enabled on the device, as the stock camera application doesn't provide any manual controls for enabling or disabling EIS. What is curious is that the video stream only drops to 16Mbps compared to 1080p's 18Mbps bitrate, making for better image quality in moving subjects. Again we're seeing a significant loss of detail and I can even start seeing chromatic aberrations on contrasted edges such as the tree branches.


720p100 Slow Motion​

Meizu offers a separate camera mode that is essentially a 100fps slow motion recording mode in 720p resolution. I found it odd that the resulting video file's meta-data retains the real-time video recording length instead of the actual playback length. The above sample video contains a 20 second capture time that is stretched to a video playback time of little over 80 seconds, meaning we're recording at 4x slow motion.

The MX4 Pro's video recording capabilities remain borderline satisfactory due to the lack of a more effective EIS implementation. The 4K mode is definitely the most impressive due to the amount of detail that is being retained from the sensor, but it's hampered by storage space due to the lack of a microSD card.

Battery Life & Charge Time Conclusion
Comments Locked

70 Comments

View All Comments

  • olafgarten - Monday, February 16, 2015 - link

    This looks like an iSamsung.
  • jameskatt - Monday, February 16, 2015 - link

    This is why Samsung is in deep trouble. Bottom feeders like Meizu can simply copy Samsung's designs and sell more phones, killing Samsung's own opportunity to sell phones.
  • sonny73n - Tuesday, February 17, 2015 - link

    Copy Samesung designs? Lol. Don't you even know all smartphones are rectangle with touchscreen and volume buttons? The only theft I know stealing designs from Apple is Samsung. Funny that they had pictures of the iPhone designs side by side with theirs with arrows and marks and notes showing how to. Then the whole thing leaked out and Samesung got their arses sued off. I couldn't stop laughing when I saw those pictures. Google it.

    Samesung design is ugly. They keep releasing the same old ugly thing over and over, protruding camera and speaker on the back, only in different sizes. Lol. Then they call it new and slap a premium price on it. Low specs and high price on the same ugly thing lol.

    Oh! Didn't you know they cheated in benchmarks? Lol. So lame. I can't wait for those cheating crooks hit the dumps.
  • TT Masterzz - Monday, February 16, 2015 - link

    Nice to see AT reviewing devices primarily sold in Asia. On a side note why don't you guys review Xiaomi devices. Xiaomi is much bigger than Meizu. They are the largest in China and some of their smartphones are amongst the top 10 most sold smartphones in the world. Would love to see a review of Mi Note Pro for example.
  • Pissedoffyouth - Monday, February 16, 2015 - link

    I'd like them to do even less known ones, like ThL phones or similar.
  • jjj - Monday, February 16, 2015 - link

    It is the second cheapest 1440p (or about that in this case) phone on the market at China prices (2499CNY/400$) after the Iuni U3 but maybe the MX 4 is more interesting since it's 20% cheaper and the most interesting Meizu is the m1 Note since it's one of the first to define the new 2015 midrange (5.5 inch 108p, 8xA53 , 2GB RAM at 160$).
    As for the lack of microSD, they have an Apple fetish they have a hard time doing better so the Meizu m1 is their first device with one, all previous models don't have it.
    But Meizu is a name to watch this year, by my estimates they sold 6.5-7.5 million units last year but they changed strategy and instead of one device per year now they are playing in a bunch of price bands. So they'll have fantastic growth this year ,they'll easily hit 20 million units but in an ideal scenario they could even get close to 40 million units. They are trying to catch Xiaomi (Xiaomi went from 1 model to a few earlier) and they might get there in 2-3 years.
    Hard to say if they have the intelligence, creativity, instinct to do more and actually make a difference but we shall see.
    Oh and ofc hopefully they'll get the Exynos 7420 or better in their next flagship since Meizu always goes Samsung (the only significant external win for Exynos so far) so their next flagship could be one of the few devices faster than most other flagships that are by default SD810 based.
  • jjj - Monday, February 16, 2015 - link

    Also too bad you can't test LTE, was curious how Marvell does, they usually do a got job in everything (HDD controller, SSD controller, networking) but in mobile they had some tough years with the Blackberry decline.
  • Andrei Frumusanu - Monday, February 16, 2015 - link

    Like I said it does pretty well in subjective testing. I just need to get more Qualcomm devices and I'll do a proper comparison of all of them in the future.
  • jjj - Monday, February 16, 2015 - link

    Maybe AT could do a dedicated article on LTE with Qualcomm , Marvell , Mediatek , Intel ,Hisilicon. Icera.
  • Gemuk - Monday, February 16, 2015 - link

    Sad indeed that 8xA53 is considered midrange nowadays. Agree though that the m1 Note should do well, at least until Xiaomi releases the Redmi Note 2 (if there is one)

Log in

Don't have an account? Sign up now