MSI GT72: High Quality Gaming Performance

While the GTX 980M does manage to break 30FPS in all titles at our Ultra settings, there are times when dropping things down a notch can provide a better overall experience. Our High settings do exactly that, and if you're playing on battery power the added FPS headroom should yield overall improved battery life when BatteryBoost is enabled.

Again, full disclosure for the High settings is that I generally skip MSAA and SSAA, though if FXAA is available I do enable that. For Batman: Arkham Origins the settings are the same as Ultra (all DX11 features and other rendering enhancements enabled except for PhysX), but FXAA High is used instead of 4xMSAA. BioShock Infinite uses the VeryHigh preset (DX11 path), and Company of Heroes 2 uses High Image Quality and Textures, no Anti-Aliasing, with Snow and Physics set to Medium. GRID Autosport uses the High present with no anti-aliasing, and Metro: Last Light Redux uses High Quality and Tessellation without SSAA. Finally, Sleeping Dogs, Sniper Elite 3, and Tomb Raider all use the "High" defaults (which includes High FXAA and "Medium" SSAA for Sleeping Dogs).

1920x1080 High Performance

Batman: Arkham Origins - High

Bioshock Infinite - High

Company of Heroes 2 - High

GRID Autosport - High

Metro: Last Light Redux - High

Sleeping Dogs - High

Sniper Elite 3 - High

Tomb Raider - High

Average FPS for Eight Games - High

Here's where "beyond 1080p gaming" is really an option, as without SSAA and/or 4xMSAA many of the games push into the triple digit frame rates. Company of Heroes 2 seems to run into a CPU bottleneck or some other limit, as even at lower settings it doesn't get much above 60 FPS, making it the lowest performing game in our High settings. Metro: Last Light Redux actually breaks well past 60FPS for a change, Sleeping Dogs comes in at just under 100 FPS, and everything else is at the point where stereoscopic 3D at 60+ FPS is a viable option (though that's not supported on the MSI GT72 display).

Average performance compared among the GPUs is actually about the same as at our Ultra settings, meaning in general the games we're testing are still mostly GPU limited at 1080p High – they're just hitting much higher frame rates now. The exception is the desktop system, where the GTX 970 lead over the 980M grows a bit more (it's 29% faster now vs. 24% faster at Ultra settings). If I were to do another test at Medium quality settings, I think we'd really start to see CPU bottlenecks show up, but it's not really worth the effort as most games are already running well above screen refresh rates.

MSI GT72: Ultra Quality Gaming Performance Initial Thoughts
Comments Locked

53 Comments

View All Comments

  • Laststop311 - Wednesday, October 8, 2014 - link

    I'm assuming these m2 slots are sata based and not pci-e based. That kinda sucks. What I would really love to see would be a different radical allocation of the 16 cpu based pci-e lanes. Only 8 lanes are needed for the GPU there really is no difference between 16x and 8x. So if msi could run the gpu from 8x lanes and then run 2x pci-e 3.0 lanes to each m2 slot. so 4x 2x lanes for the 4 m2 slots equals 8 lanes and 8x lanes for the gpu there is your 16 total lanes. Yes I know 4x lanes for each m2 would be ideal but even 2 lanes gives 2GB/sec which is pretty much faster than any ssd currently. If this machine took 4x pci-e 3.0 2x m2 ssd's i'd be all over it. RAID 0 with a max of 8GB/sec throughput is insane. 4x of the Samsung 1TB sm951 m2 ssd's with native pci-e 3.0 interface and nvme would be insanity. 4TB of super fast SSD storage -drools-
  • bin806 - Thursday, October 9, 2014 - link

    People who own msi gt dominator with 870M or 880M can upgrade their GPU to a 970M or 980M....:) MSI released a video guide today..:)

    http://m.youtube.com/watch?v=QZZ5hGDZpI8

    Another cool thing is you can upgrade to next generation Maxwell GPU as well when it comes out in late 2015..:)
  • RoninX - Sunday, October 12, 2014 - link

    It's time to upgrade my XPS 15 L502X (GT 525M), and I'm seriously considering the GT60 Dominator or GS60 Ghost, both with the 970M. Are there any differences I should be aware of other than the form factor and the price? I know the Dominator has a larger, replaceable battery, and of course, the Ghost is much lighter and thinner.

    Do they use the same screen? Would you expect much of a difference in performance?

    I know there aren't that many people who have the 970M yet, but I'd also be interested in general feedback from anyone who owns an earlier generation GT60 or GS60.

Log in

Don't have an account? Sign up now