Crysis: Warhead

Up next is our legacy title for 2014, Crysis: Warhead. The stand-alone expansion to 2007’s Crysis, at over 5 years old Crysis: Warhead can still beat most systems down. Crysis was intended to be future-looking as far as performance and visual quality goes, and it has clearly achieved that. We’ve only finally reached the point where single-GPU cards have come out that can hit 60fps at 1920 with 4xAA, never mind 2560 and beyond.

Crysis: Warhead - 3840x2160 - Gamer Quality

Crysis: Warhead - 2560x1440 - Enthusiast Quality + 4x MSAA

Crysis: Warhead - 1920x1080 - Enthusiast Quality + 4x MSAA

With the GTX 980 already falling just short of beating the R9 290XU in Crysis: Warhead, this is the only other instance where the GTX 970 isn’t a completely competitive card. Even the EVGA FTW overclock can’t help it catch up to the R9 290, let alone the R9 290XU. Crysis simply calls for more shader power than what the GTX 970 can realistically deliver.

Crysis: Warhead - Min. Frame Rate - 3840x2160 - Gamer Quality

Crysis: Warhead - Min. Frame Rate - 2560x1440 - Enthusiast Quality + 4x MSAA

The story is much the same with minimum framerates. Although GTX 970 doesn’t fare any worse relatively speaking, it also doesn’t get to close the gap.

Crysis 3 Total War: Rome 2
Comments Locked

155 Comments

View All Comments

  • dibbademevos - Tuesday, September 30, 2014 - link

    hi
  • dibbademevos - Tuesday, September 30, 2014 - link


    hi
  • SkyBill40 - Wednesday, October 1, 2014 - link

    Having always been an MSI guy, I've not really considered going with another vendor... until now. This looks like a nice card which also happens to conveniently match my color scheme whereas the red coloring of the MSI Gaming line sadly does not. Still, the overclocks are pretty much a wash and the only real differences seem to be in the cooling solution. The ACX 2.0 seems to be on par with the MSI, so I suppose I could go either way.
  • Oxford Guy - Saturday, October 4, 2014 - link

    Is it the case that the ACX card uses only 4 power phases which is why overclocking it beyond the factory setting isn't going to work very well? There is no mention of power phases in your article.
  • Kanuj5678 - Sunday, October 5, 2014 - link

    GTX 970 beats the shit out of everything and that too in style with lowest TDP

    Cheers
    Kanuj
  • ambientblue - Wednesday, April 29, 2015 - link

    Enthusiasts dont care about TDP that much. The 290x is held back by HSF cooling (Uber mode is actually stock advertised speeds) while the GTX 970 is not. Water-cool the 290x and OC it to 1200mhz and it will match a 980, surpassing it at 4K resolution easily.
  • igyb - Tuesday, October 7, 2014 - link

    Is the gtx 970 just an underclocked 980? i might just get that because i cant really afford a 980.
  • Kimtastic - Tuesday, October 21, 2014 - link

    Dear Ryan,

    I had a MSI GTX 970 and found that under heavy load the core clock was fluctuating and causing FPS drops. After having read this article, I now understand that its due to the TDP limit. Is this something that will/can be fixed or something permanent?

    I would be grateful for your advice. Many thanks.
  • hoohoo - Thursday, October 23, 2014 - link

    Thank you for including an HD7970 in the test!
  • Shoiti2 - Monday, November 3, 2014 - link

    Those price are damn cheap. I would say, buying a gtx980 in the U.S wouldnt even buy a gtx 970 in Brazil. I'm living in Brazil right now and ordered an evga gtx 970 sc. Ok, how much did i pay for the gtx 970!! Nothing less than $750USD.
    the Gtx 970 at $750USD still very cheap for us Brazilian, the world's most expensive country.
    The evga gtx 980 is costing around $1100USD, not kidding, check for yourself.

Log in

Don't have an account? Sign up now