ASUS X99-Deluxe Conclusion

A lot of positive remarks have been made about the styling of the X99-Deluxe. There has been no modern attempt to style white and black properly on the motherboard, and when taking the product out of the packaging it does feel like there is a touch of finesse to the product. This may be derived purely from the white strip down the left hand side covering some of the PCB and the rear panel and the consistency in the visual aesthetic. On closer inspection, it does come to realize that the white strip is plastic and only there for the aesthetic value, but to ASUS’ credit it does look smooth and proud.

The X99-Deluxe is the most expensive X99 motherboard in our first set of reviews at $400, and actually sits near the top of the entire X99 stack. As a result, it has new or exciting features coming out of every corner. We discussed the new features such as the OC Socket to help with overclocking, the vertical M.2 x4 slot for drives and the multi-GPU switch that lights up the PCIe slots where GPUs should be placed for 2/3-way gaming. Also included in the box are a Hyper M.2 x4 PCIe card for more storage and an antenna for the 3T3R 802.11ac module – the X99-Deluxe is currently the only motherboard with a tri-stream 802.11ac solution integrated into the platform.

The more usual bonus features include dual SATA Express ports, dual Intel network connections and Crystal Sound 2 which translates as an improved ALC1150 codec with EMI shields, de-pop circuits, PCB separation and impedance detection. ASUS has also introduced a fan extension PCB, supporting another three four-pin headers alongside the six already on the motherboard. This comes with an adhesive strip, allowing system designers to place the fan PCB near where it is needed. All the fans are DC and PWM controllable as well.

The performance of the ASUS X99-Deluxe is a little mixed. Overclocking results give it 4.6 GHz under 95C load temperatures, and audio results put it at the top of our X99 charts. DPC Latency is in the middle but still very good, with POST times around the 21 second mark similar to the other motherboards. Power consumption is also in the middle.

Unfortunately though the CPU performance at stock seems a little down compared to the others. We have tackled the issue of MultiCore Turbo previously at AnandTech, and the i7-5960X is odd that while it has a base frequency of 3.0 GHz, the 3.5 GHz turbo mode is quite rare and the CPU sits more happily at 3.3 GHz. It would seem that the ASUS X99-Deluxe does implement a form of MultiCore Turbo, although slightly less aggressive than some of the other motherboards. As a result, CPU performance at stock is a little down (1145 in 3DPM-MT vs 1271 for MSI). But, when overclocked, the ASUS seems to perform better than other motherboards (PovRay at 4.0 GHz, ASUS 3223 vs MSI 3121) so it does not come across as big worry – just place the system in TPU mode one and away you go.

It is easy to be impressed with the ASUS X99-Deluxe. Not only the design, but the BIOS, software and extra features all give it a boost above most of the X99 products on the market right now. Simple things like the XMP switch and the multi-GPU light-up LEDs improve the experience, while the bundled Hyper M.2 x4 PCIe card and 802.11ac 3T3R WiFi module give tangible benefits to spending over the average.

For the X99 launch, ASUS launched only two models to the North American market – this X99 Deluxe and the $500 Rampage V Extreme. The X99-A, X99-Pro and X99-WS are all in the pipeline, but it still means ASUS is focusing more on fewer motherboards giving time to improve each one. The argument from other manufacturers is that having more motherboards offers more choice, although if you want something like the X99-Deluxe, it is a polished product and hits the market it needs to with a wake-up call.

I enjoyed the X99-Deluxe. Most X99 users will too. Out of the motherboards tested today, it certainly deserves to be recommended for an i7-5960X build.

ASUS X99-Deluxe

Gaming Benchmarks GIGABYTE X99-UD7 WiFi Conclusion
Comments Locked

62 Comments

View All Comments

  • StephaneP - Friday, September 26, 2014 - link

    On the Intel Motherboards, there was an onboard speaker. It was useful for hearing problems with Ram, Gpu, overheat, Fan fail...
    I don't see any speaker on these motherboards...
  • R3MF - Friday, September 26, 2014 - link

    Re: the MSI X99S SLI Plus -

    "This means that with a 40 PCIe lane CPU, a user has to choose between tri-GPU (x16/x16/x8) + M.2 x2 from the chipset, or 2x GPU (x16/x16) + M.2 x4. 5820K users will get M.2 x4 in any configuration (x16/x8, x8/x8/x8)."

    Do I understand this to mean that the same M.2 slot will switch between PCIe 2.0 PCH lanes and PCIe 3.0 CPU lanes depending on whether the last PCIe slot is used, and that 5820K users will always get PCIe 3.0 M.2 because the last PCIEe slot is not available for use at all?

    Further from this; using a 5820k can i only use two PCIe slots if I want to maintain the first slot with 16x for the GPU, or are some of the slots run from the PCH and thus not affected by this.

    I quite like the idea of a single GPU system (with 3.0 16x), a PCIe USB TypeC expansion card (with 3.0 4x), and possibly a third PCIe slot for a sound card. Is that possible with this board?

    Thanks, great article.
  • Infn - Friday, September 26, 2014 - link

    So purely performance-wise I still don't have much reason to upgrade from my 4.5ghz 3930K on X79. Is there anything on the horizon that will?
  • woj666 - Friday, September 26, 2014 - link

    Nope. You hit a great sweet spot with that system. Keep upgrading your GPU and you'll last a long time.
  • StevoLincolnite - Friday, September 26, 2014 - link

    Might want to update this article.

    X79 supports 4-12 core processors rather than 4-6, that you have listed.
    I.E. For example the Asus Sabertooth X79 supports the 8-core Xeon E5-2640 v2 and the 10-core Xeon E5-2650L v2 as well as the 12-core Xeon E5-2697 v2.

    Granted, consumers won't be running those Xeons, but the point stands, that you're not only limited to 4-6 cores on x79.

    It's ironic because ALL Sandy-Bridge-E processors were actually 8-core processors, with 2 cores disabled, which helped with cooling due to the larger die meeting with the heat spreader.
    Ivy Bridge-E however Intel reduced the core count down to 6.
  • extide - Saturday, September 27, 2014 - link

    Except for the 3820K, that is a native quad core die. In moving to Ivy/22nm the base die for LGA 2011 went from 4 core to 6 core, and so for Ivy E all the CPU's were based on just the low end 6 core die, vs Sandy where they needed to use the 8 core die to get 6 cores.
  • ludikraut - Friday, September 26, 2014 - link

    I really hope you guys get an ASUS X99-E WS in to run through its paces. Some nice boards here, but just not in the same league feature and layout-wise.

    l8r)
  • Ian Cutress - Sunday, September 28, 2014 - link

    I've made a note :) Going to try and clear the backlog so we can get some others in!
  • Etern205 - Friday, September 26, 2014 - link

    Sorry for the derail of this article, but has anyone notice Gigabyte also using some type of OC socket just like the Asus.
    http://www.legitreviews.com/gigabyte-ga-x99-soc-fo...
  • Ian Cutress - Sunday, September 28, 2014 - link

    I have seen similar comments about this. The SOC Force LN2 board in that article is typically a limited run for extreme overclockers at GIGABYTE sponsored events. At this point we're not even sure exactly what ASUS or GIGABYTE is doing with the extra pins, or if they're doing different things with them. I have the standard SOC Force motherboard here, the one that end-users can buy, and it is using the standard X99 socket.

Log in

Don't have an account? Sign up now