ASUS X99-Deluxe Conclusion

A lot of positive remarks have been made about the styling of the X99-Deluxe. There has been no modern attempt to style white and black properly on the motherboard, and when taking the product out of the packaging it does feel like there is a touch of finesse to the product. This may be derived purely from the white strip down the left hand side covering some of the PCB and the rear panel and the consistency in the visual aesthetic. On closer inspection, it does come to realize that the white strip is plastic and only there for the aesthetic value, but to ASUS’ credit it does look smooth and proud.

The X99-Deluxe is the most expensive X99 motherboard in our first set of reviews at $400, and actually sits near the top of the entire X99 stack. As a result, it has new or exciting features coming out of every corner. We discussed the new features such as the OC Socket to help with overclocking, the vertical M.2 x4 slot for drives and the multi-GPU switch that lights up the PCIe slots where GPUs should be placed for 2/3-way gaming. Also included in the box are a Hyper M.2 x4 PCIe card for more storage and an antenna for the 3T3R 802.11ac module – the X99-Deluxe is currently the only motherboard with a tri-stream 802.11ac solution integrated into the platform.

The more usual bonus features include dual SATA Express ports, dual Intel network connections and Crystal Sound 2 which translates as an improved ALC1150 codec with EMI shields, de-pop circuits, PCB separation and impedance detection. ASUS has also introduced a fan extension PCB, supporting another three four-pin headers alongside the six already on the motherboard. This comes with an adhesive strip, allowing system designers to place the fan PCB near where it is needed. All the fans are DC and PWM controllable as well.

The performance of the ASUS X99-Deluxe is a little mixed. Overclocking results give it 4.6 GHz under 95C load temperatures, and audio results put it at the top of our X99 charts. DPC Latency is in the middle but still very good, with POST times around the 21 second mark similar to the other motherboards. Power consumption is also in the middle.

Unfortunately though the CPU performance at stock seems a little down compared to the others. We have tackled the issue of MultiCore Turbo previously at AnandTech, and the i7-5960X is odd that while it has a base frequency of 3.0 GHz, the 3.5 GHz turbo mode is quite rare and the CPU sits more happily at 3.3 GHz. It would seem that the ASUS X99-Deluxe does implement a form of MultiCore Turbo, although slightly less aggressive than some of the other motherboards. As a result, CPU performance at stock is a little down (1145 in 3DPM-MT vs 1271 for MSI). But, when overclocked, the ASUS seems to perform better than other motherboards (PovRay at 4.0 GHz, ASUS 3223 vs MSI 3121) so it does not come across as big worry – just place the system in TPU mode one and away you go.

It is easy to be impressed with the ASUS X99-Deluxe. Not only the design, but the BIOS, software and extra features all give it a boost above most of the X99 products on the market right now. Simple things like the XMP switch and the multi-GPU light-up LEDs improve the experience, while the bundled Hyper M.2 x4 PCIe card and 802.11ac 3T3R WiFi module give tangible benefits to spending over the average.

For the X99 launch, ASUS launched only two models to the North American market – this X99 Deluxe and the $500 Rampage V Extreme. The X99-A, X99-Pro and X99-WS are all in the pipeline, but it still means ASUS is focusing more on fewer motherboards giving time to improve each one. The argument from other manufacturers is that having more motherboards offers more choice, although if you want something like the X99-Deluxe, it is a polished product and hits the market it needs to with a wake-up call.

I enjoyed the X99-Deluxe. Most X99 users will too. Out of the motherboards tested today, it certainly deserves to be recommended for an i7-5960X build.

ASUS X99-Deluxe

Gaming Benchmarks GIGABYTE X99-UD7 WiFi Conclusion
Comments Locked

62 Comments

View All Comments

  • The Von Matrices - Friday, September 26, 2014 - link

    Ian never said the MSI board wouldn't overclock, just that an unidentified bug causes its overclocked performance to be significantly lower than the other boards. based upon the results, putting your same CPU in the other boards would make it perform CPU 4.5% faster; alternatively, you would have to clock your CPU to 4.8GHz in the MSI board to match the 4.6GHz overclocks in the other boards.
  • woj666 - Friday, September 26, 2014 - link

    This review had the opposite result. The MSI board was able to perform even better than the others overclocked. It's disappointing but sometimes we just get bad boards.

    http://www.bit-tech.net/hardware/2014/09/09/x99-mo...
  • The Von Matrices - Saturday, September 27, 2014 - link

    The bit-tech review has the CPU in the MSI board overclocked higher than the other boards, which would reasonably would make it perform better. The problem that Ian experienced is not that the board couldn't overclock the CPU; it's that at the same clock speed, the MSI board is significantly slower than its competitors, and the bit-tech results do not replicate Ian's circumstances since they have different overclocks on each CPU on each board.
  • just4U - Thursday, September 25, 2014 - link

    From the article "I have had failures in the past (Bluetooth adaptor shorting out, DRAM or PCIe slots not working, PSU going BANG… twice) "

    ----

    I was half-cut trying to install ram at 4am.. in near darkness, the combination turned into a epic fail..
  • owcraftsman - Thursday, September 25, 2014 - link

    Very unfair to MSI to select top of the line boards for the other manufacturers and a bottom of the stack from MSI. The SLI Plus is a value edition at best so spare me an explanation.
  • bigboxes - Friday, September 26, 2014 - link

    "Due to the way the motherboard manufacturers were sampling for X99, we were unable to align several motherboards of a similar price." If you had actually read the article you may have not come across as a love struck fanboy.
  • The_Assimilator - Friday, September 26, 2014 - link

    Apparently you failed to notice (no doubt because you didn't read the article) that the MSI was gicven a "Recommended" award. Explanation: you are a tool.
  • Laststop311 - Friday, September 26, 2014 - link

    Once again Asus is on top. Their bios is the best designed with the best features. It's why my x58 board is an asus rampage formula. I'm gonna stay with x58 tho rather get a 55" LG oled TV
  • The Von Matrices - Saturday, September 27, 2014 - link

    For the price of the ASUS board plus a 5820K CPU you could have any of the other boards plus a 5930K CPU, which would negate any performance advantage of the ASUS board. The ASUS board is only worth considering if price is no object, which from my experience seems to describe most LGA2011 buyers.
  • Dadunn1700 - Tuesday, August 25, 2015 - link

    Or u can save up for alittle while longer and get the Asus board AND the 5930k AND be faster yet again. Round and round we go. Although it's much easier to chg a CPU rather than a whole motherboard.

    Point is No matter what better is better....but not necessarily at the same price point. Tho I don't think $500 is a lot of money for enthusiasts to spend on PC parts. Especially essential ones. Being a flagship motherboard it's not exactly geared toward budget builders anyway....ie ppl concerned with performance per dollar. They want the best....period.

    Personally I don't think $500 is a lot of money myself for a part i probably won't be replacing anytime soon.

Log in

Don't have an account? Sign up now