GIGABYTE X99-UD7 WiFi Conclusion

GIGABYTE and ASUS are locked in a battle with each other to sell the most motherboards this year. Despite a few recent quarters of lower sales, the upswing in the gaming PC market driven by high resolution gaming and renewed interest sees both manufacturers aiming well above 20 million units each, despite a global motherboard sales number about 75-80 million expected for 2014. Each of these companies has a different tactic – ASUS goes for fewer SKUs and focuses on each one, whereas GIGABYTE offers more SKUs to appeal to more users. There are certain challenges in both lineups, and it reflects in the fact that ASUS had two motherboards at the launch of X99 and GIGABYTE aimed at eight.

The X99 UD7-WiFi sits at the top of GIGABYTE’s Ultra Durable line at $310, followed by the similar UD5, then UD4 and UD3. For overclocking there is the X99-SOC Force (and SOC Force-LN2 for extreme overclockers) with gaming relying on the Gaming 5, the Gaming 7 and the Gaming G1. This encompasses a price range from $245 (UD3) to $350 (SOC Force), so while we are aiming at the cheaper end of X99, the more $400 oriented products might be further down the line.

For the X99-UD7 WiFi, GIGABYTE certainly did a number of things right. Supplying WiFi via M.2 is a nice touch, giving a new way to introduce WiFi and then stacking another M.2 for storage on top. By placing the extra circuitry needed, GIGABYTE also ensures that every motherboard across its range can support full-bandwidth four-way GPU configurations. Things like the 30 micron gold pins and extra space for mounting holes also helps reduce issues from screwdrivers that stray or corrosion oriented climates.

Despite all this, my biggest WOW moment with the GIGABYTE X99-UD7 WiFi was the bundled sleeved cables. Perhaps I spend too much time indoors reviewing CPUs and motherboards, but it is a nice touch that needs to be commonplace across all $150 and up motherboards. A positive about the PCIe area is the VGA power being provided by a SATA cable in the right area. The USB 3.0 layout is also good, giving two PCH headers and two Renesas hubs for eight ports on the rear to free up PCIe lanes.

There are some issues to take with the design, such as PCIe storage still being an issue depending on which route you take meaning that only one type can be used. While M.2 WiFi is a cool idea, and our sample had the WiFi antenna kept close to the motherboard by a plastic tool, it is not always wise to have those cables about on the motherboard. 

On the benchmark front, the GIGABYTE suffers a little similar to the ASUS by not implementing a totally aggressive MultiCore Turbo throughout any hardware setup. So at stock we had a few numbers lower than expected, although when overclocked this no longer mattered so much. Peak power consumption under load was very good, along with USB speeds, although there was an issue with the audio. Similar to Z97, there is some feature on GIGABYTE boards that causes software-detectable distortion at high volume levels. However if the volume is decreased, peak range is lowered. POST times were also around 25 seconds, matching the X99 WS.

Similar to my Z97 conclusions on GIGABYTE, the BIOS still needs work into making it the interactive tool we need. Fan controls are still lacking in depth, and all we end up with is a glorified menu with relatively few new features. The software is a plus point, making it easy to select the options the user needs however there is room for improvement, especially when it comes to Live Update.

The GIGABYTE X99-UD7 WiFi ends up being a nice motherboard to use with a decent technical portfolio. Delving into the features on an intricate level could come easier to hand, but it won’t stop users plugging in a Haswell-E for a high end gaming system.

ASUS X99-Deluxe Conclusion ASRock X99 WS Conclusion
Comments Locked

62 Comments

View All Comments

  • biostud - Thursday, September 25, 2014 - link

    ASUS also has the X99-A at launch, at least here in Europe.
  • isa - Thursday, September 25, 2014 - link

    Ian, thanks for a great job overall on this article. I especially appreciated your clarity on how the PCIe and M.2 configs work.
  • SanX - Thursday, September 25, 2014 - link

    +1
  • SanX - Friday, September 26, 2014 - link

    Ian is on Liquid Nitrogen.
    The Monster-review :-)
  • icrf - Thursday, September 25, 2014 - link

    Sounds like the Asus X99-A is the one for me. It keeps all the good stuff about the X99-Deluxe and saves $125. I don't need so many SATA or USB ports, I don't need wifi or dual GbE. I get the pile of fan headers and great sound, BIOS, and overclocking. Now I just need to know where the sweet spot is for memory count, speed, and timings. I suspect that's next on Ian's list.
  • Eyeshield21 - Thursday, September 25, 2014 - link

    Great roundup review. ASUS is falling lately. Did you guys heard about the burnt motherboard that their X99 had? I wonder how many people have this issue.
  • The Von Matrices - Friday, September 26, 2014 - link

    So somehow you have determined it is a great roundup without even reading the first page?
  • The_Assimilator - Friday, September 26, 2014 - link

    This is a really poor anti-ASUS shill comment.
  • xunknownx - Thursday, September 25, 2014 - link

    i have the MSI x99s sli plus and its great. its beautiful and feels premium. http://imgur.com/Q7u6qjD
    not sure why the article say its not for overclockers. i overclocked my i7 5820k to 4.6ghz easily and its running stable. i don't need so many extra ports or wifi. at $230, its a great value for such an awesome board.
  • jay401 - Thursday, September 25, 2014 - link

    Because then you won't spend twice the price for a more expensive board.

Log in

Don't have an account? Sign up now