Final Words

The OnePlus One is quite possibly the most interesting phone I’ve seen in a while, and reviewing this device was extremely difficult due to how frustrating some aspects of the device were. OnePlus itself is a company that seems to come from nowhere, although it’s evident to some extent that OnePlus and Oppo are currently quite close in the production of these devices as a great deal is shared with the Oppo Find 7A. Aside from this, the One is a critical device as it seems to be the phone that could be the first to kill the concept of a 650 USD flagship smartphone. In order to figure out whether OnePlus has succeeded, it’s important to revisit all aspects under review before passing any final judgments.

To start, OnePlus really has nailed the industrial and material design of the One. While it certainly isn’t an aluminum unibody, it’s a far cry from the glossy plastic designs that are often quite popular with OEMs. The entire design clearly has had a great deal of thought put into it, from the earpiece to the sandstone finish. It’s often said that there’s a right way and a wrong way to do a plastic phone. In this case, OnePlus has definitely done it right. The minimal design is definitely appreciated, as is the in-hand feel from the shape and materials of the device. Unfortunately, this phone is just far too big for one-handed use. If the LG G3 was on the edge of one-handed usability, this goes just a step further. The larger bezels and more angular shape of the OnePlus One make it extremely difficult to use with one hand, and is therefore best compared against phablets.

One of the main justifications for pushing the limits of size so much with “phones” is because this makes it possible to push larger batteries and therefore more battery life. In this regard, the OnePlus One definitely justifies its larger size. The battery life of the OnePlus One is class-leading, and it’s really unlike anything else on the market today. The OnePlus One also manages to post impressive sustained performance scores, which speaks to the larger surface area and efficient thermal design of the One. Surprisingly, despite the large battery the One charges almost as quickly as phones with QC 2.0 fast charging.

The other high point worth talking about is the display. Despite the low price, the display on the OnePlus One is decidedly high end. The color calibration is almost as good as it gets for a smartphone, with high brightness and relatively high contrast. There are some issues with viewing angles, but these are generally quite minor in nature.

OnePlus has also managed to deliver a high-end SoC for a decidedly mid-range price. While it’s disappointing to see benchmark cheating, it seems that this behavior is isolated for the most part. The Snapdragon 801 in the One performs identically to everything else with the same SoC, which is definitely good to see. In the same vein, it’s great to see OnePlus shipping incredibly fast NAND in this device with reasonably-priced storage tiering.

However, the OnePlus One is far from perfect. While the hardware is great for the most part, the camera and the camera experience are deeply disappointing. While the Nexus 5 didn’t have the best camera in the world, it managed to ship with some sort of noise reduction and hot pixel removal to improve final image quality. The OnePlus One shipped with approximately none of these things and a rather painful camera application. While one can get by with using this application, it’s much easier to use Google Camera instead of the Cyanogen camera. Despite this and updates to add image processing, I’m still not all that impressed by the camera. This update has also made it effectively impossible to take photos off-hand in low light, as the 1/6 second shutter speed is far too long for a camera without OIS.

Unfortunately, these issues with the camera UI can be seen in the software experience as a whole. There is a strong and consistent focus on presenting as many options and features as possible to the detriment of user friendliness. While I appreciate the extent of customization available throughout the OS, it feels as if it’s still very much the same XDA ROM with a serious lack of polish. I suspect that this has little to do with OnePlus though, as Cyanogen is the one that seems to be driving UI decisions more than anything. Regardless of where the fault lies, it’s critical for these issues to be resolved for the OnePlus Two.

Overall though, the OnePlus One isn’t a bad phone by any means. It remains one of the cheapest devices with Snapdragon 801 on the market, and the hardware on offer is really something great. However, there is a disappointing level of polish in this product. This doesn’t make the OnePlus One a bad phone, but it this does mean that it won’t kill the flagship model any time soon. There are too many issues to directly compare this phone to other high-end smartphones without bringing the price of the phone into the equation. However, taking into account the extremely low price the OnePlus One is well worth comparing to other high-end devices. The OnePlus One has compromises like every other device. Whether these compromises are acceptable is up to the buyer to decide.

WiFi, GNSS, Misc
Comments Locked

148 Comments

View All Comments

  • tipoo - Wednesday, November 19, 2014 - link

    That last part wouldn't make sense either, the M8 and 6 Plus have longer battery life during the test too.
  • tipoo - Wednesday, November 19, 2014 - link

    Oh yeah, and I'm pleasantly surprised this phone is getting a review at all, having much less mass consumer knowledge than some others despite a strong enthusiast following (yay, us!).
  • JoshHo - Wednesday, November 19, 2014 - link

    Compared to S801 devices the OnePlus One throttles relatively little.
  • tipoo - Wednesday, November 19, 2014 - link

    Ah, thanks for explaining. Any idea why this is? Just a big chassis, or the heat spreader on it, or software?
  • jjj - Wednesday, November 19, 2014 - link

    You need to at least specify what NAND the iphone you tested are using,
    All the iphone 6 and 6 plus numbers are compromised by Apple's usage of both MLC and TLC. You got major NAND perf and RAM usage differences and that should impact pretty much all the numbers.
  • ziangc - Wednesday, November 19, 2014 - link

    thanks for the review :) that mentioned, would a comparison with the Oppo Find 7 yield a similar review conclusion? being a user of the Find 7, i would be interested to hear your 2 cents' worth on it as well.
  • jjj - Wednesday, November 19, 2014 - link

    "the first to kill the concept of a 650 USD"
    Hilariously how little you know and understand the market.
  • tipoo - Wednesday, November 19, 2014 - link

    Go on? If you're thinking subsidized prices, you're still paying for that one way or another. The cost of the phone is included in the bill. Besides that, most carriers will take some percent off your bill if you bring your own phone. And besides *that*, some carriers just have plain crappy phones.
  • tipoo - Wednesday, November 19, 2014 - link

    Also for someone like me, I like having a smartphone, but since I'm in a wifi zone for so much of my life I don't bother paying for data. Bill is so much cheaper.
  • Flunk - Wednesday, November 19, 2014 - link

    That's funny, I thought I bought a Nexus 5 for $350 without carrier of any kind last year.

Log in

Don't have an account? Sign up now