Sleeping Dogs

Sleeping Dogs is a benchmarking wet dream – a highly complex benchmark that can bring the toughest setup and high resolutions down into single figures. Having an extreme SSAO setting can do that, but at the right settings Sleeping Dogs is highly playable and enjoyable. We run the basic benchmark program laid out in the Adrenaline benchmark tool, and the Xtreme (1920x1080, Maximum) performance setting, noting down the average frame rates and the minimum frame rates.

Sleeping Dogs: 1080p Max, 1x GTX 770

Sleeping Dogs, 1080p Max
  NVIDIA AMD
Average Frame Rates
Minimum Frame Rates

Company of Heroes 2

Company of Heroes 2 also can bring a top end GPU to its knees, even at very basic benchmark settings. To get an average 30 FPS using a normal GPU is a challenge, let alone a minimum frame rate of 30 FPS. For this benchmark I use modified versions of Ryan’s batch files at 1920x1080 on High. COH2 is a little odd in that it does not scale with more GPUs with the drivers we use.

Company Of Heroes 2: 1080p Max, 1x GTX 770

Company of Heroes 2, 1080p Max
  NVIDIA AMD
Average Frame Rates
Minimum Frame Rates

Battlefield 4

The EA/DICE series that has taken countless hours of my life away is back for another iteration, using the Frostbite 3 engine. AMD is also piling its resources into BF4 with the new Mantle API for developers, designed to cut the time required for the CPU to dispatch commands to the graphical sub-system. For our test we use the in-game benchmarking tools and record the frame time for the first ~70 seconds of the Tashgar single player mission, which is an on-rails generation of and rendering of objects and textures. We test at 1920x1080 at Ultra settings.

Battlefield 4: 1080p Max, 1x GTX 770

Battlefield 4, 1080p Max
  NVIDIA AMD
Average Frame Rates
99th Percentile Frame Rates
Gaming Benchmarks: F1 2013, Bioshock Infinite, Tomb Raider MSI A88XM-E35 Conclusion
Comments Locked

27 Comments

View All Comments

  • frewster - Friday, April 4, 2014 - link

    The power delivery components are around the CPU socket. That heatsink is for the southbridge.
  • trowe37 - Friday, April 4, 2014 - link

    Not sure if I am correct but on the first page of the article it lists "1 x USB 3.0 Header
    2 x USB 3.0 Headers", however looking at the motherboard shouldn't it be "2 x USB 2.0 Headers"?
  • popej - Friday, April 4, 2014 - link

    Isn't ALC887 7.1 channel chip?
  • loimlo - Saturday, April 12, 2014 - link

    Thanks Ian. It's refreshing to see budget MB reviews. Hope to see more H81/B85, A85/A88 boards' reviews. It's the boards that people purchase/use most, but get reviewed least.
  • Questor - Saturday, April 12, 2014 - link

    I would like to see these smaller form factor boards with more PCI-express 4x type slots, rather than the PCI slot. This MSI board is perfect in every way for an upcoming build, except for the PCI slot. It's the deal breaker.
    Good review, thanks for your hard work.
  • joe15 - Wednesday, July 2, 2014 - link

    Do you know if it works fine with Ubuntu?
  • lateuser - Monday, September 18, 2017 - link

    I know I am late, but may I know what is the ideal temperature for this board? Mine averages 113 centigrade, and it appears as read in speccy, which gets me worried.

Log in

Don't have an account? Sign up now