Final Words

The Galaxy S 5 is a healthy update to the series. With the Galaxy Note 3's release last year we saw a device that ultimately became the new flagship from Samsung. The GS5 takes the crown back for those users who want a more reasonably sized device.

The GS5 sees upgrades across the board compared to its predecessor. The underlying silicon is both faster and more power efficient. The battery is larger, and battery life has improved dramatically thanks to silicon and display upgrades. Much like the gains we saw with HTC's M7 to M8 transition, anyone who is on a Snapdragon 600 based device today is going to be incredibly happy upgrading to a Snapdragon 801 platform like the GS5.

Connectivity sees a boost with the addition of Qualcomm's envelope tracker and support for carrier aggregation on LTE. The inclusion of 2x2 MIMO 802.11ac brings WiFi performance to a new level with the GS5.

The move to Samsung's own 16MP rear facing camera sensor brings about an increase in spatial resolution, and some improvements in low light performance compared to the Galaxy S 4. I'm not totally sold on the GS5's image processing but the overall camera experience is pretty solid. I would still like to see Samsung move to a slightly lower resolution sensor with larger pixels to provide a more balanced solution. As of now the GS5 is a solid shooter outdoors and with decent light, but indoors and in low light solutions it struggles.

NAND performance is about the only downside to the GS5's hardware upgrade, mainly in that it seems to ignore random read/write performance in favor of sequential gains. Anyone who has followed our SSD coverage at AnandTech should know the issues with this approach.

Display is also dramatically improved from the Galaxy S4. Samsung's AMOLED panels have finally caught up with LCD in most of the key metrics while retaining the key advantages of AMOLED such as infinite contrast and higher power efficiency at lower average picture level.

It's not all hardware upgrades that makes the GS5 what it is. Samsung did an excellent job of cleaning up its UI from the crowded mess that we saw in GS4 to something much more polished. It's not perfect, but a huge step in the right direction. While the GS4 felt more like feature creep for use in marketing materials, the GS5's software is far better executed. 

There are even some nifty additions that can come in handy. Ultra low power saving mode is one in particular that seems to have a measurable impact on battery life if you're willing to give up some performance. 

Overall the Galaxy S 5 is a solid replacement to the GS4 (and definitely to any previous Samsung device). I find that pretty much all the flagships offer some set of tradeoffs that prevent any one from being the perfect device (iPhone's screen size, GS5's materials, M8's camera). It's unfortunate because I'd really like to crown a single device the king of them all, but instead we're faced with a handful of differing optimization points. Samsung got it almost perfect with the GS5. With a metal body, a rear facing camera with larger pixels (perhaps with some tweaks to camera output processing), a better NAND controller, and stereo front facing speakers, the GS5 would probably be perfect.

Software: KNOX & TouchWiz
Comments Locked

296 Comments

View All Comments

  • kmmatney - Tuesday, April 8, 2014 - link

    My LG Optimus Pro G has a MicroSD slot, and a larger screen, and was a lot cheaper than the G2. That said, I won't buy an LG phone again - third party support is too weak, and there are some really annoying bugs in the software that haven't been fixed. I would like to go back to Apple, but need a larger screen, and enough space for 24 GB of music.
  • Cheesew1z69 - Sunday, April 13, 2014 - link

    Spreading your BS here too...how...cute.
  • pppp6071 - Tuesday, April 8, 2014 - link

    lol very funny. Ignoring all best aspects like battery life gorgeous screen and knock code and superb camera. just cause its not having SD card it sucks. I am doing just fine with my Nexus 5 32 GB phone.
  • Alexey291 - Tuesday, April 8, 2014 - link

    Very funny indeed. I have more music on my sd (thanks g-music subscription) than you have on your device.

    Lets not even look at apps and other media that I may have on there. But do go on.
  • Alexey291 - Tuesday, April 8, 2014 - link

    that is to say I have more gigs of music on my sd

    Sorry :)
  • Mondozai - Tuesday, April 8, 2014 - link

    Streaming is possible. Welcome to 2014.
    SD cards are a requirement on tablets, not phones. If you need more space on your phone, you are not using it right.
  • Alexey291 - Tuesday, April 8, 2014 - link

    Yes because endless free mobile data is a global thing. I travel a lot I don't like to pay roaming charges for streaming all around europe. I suggest you try it one day and see how that works for you.

    And I approve of the "you're not holding/using it right" comment at the end.

    SD cards are a requirement on a device that I require to have an SD card. Simple as that. Besides why the hell does a tablet need an sd card more than a phone? Can't you by your own (silly) logic simply stream Blueray movies or something? Or is that going to be a 2015 thing?
  • twebber - Tuesday, April 8, 2014 - link

    Yeah if you loose internet or signal while I'm watching a wide selection of movies an listening to an extended library you can enjoy your sad replay list
  • Veruca5alt - Sunday, April 27, 2014 - link

    Who cares??
    You use over 20GB of music everyday?
    Pointless to carry around that much content.
  • Chaser - Tuesday, April 8, 2014 - link

    Couldn't agree more. The G2 is the winner this round.

Log in

Don't have an account? Sign up now