AnandTech Storage Bench 2011

Back in 2011 (which seems like so long ago now!), we introduced our AnandTech Storage Bench, a suite of benchmarks that took traces of real OS/application usage and played them back in a repeatable manner. The MOASB, officially called AnandTech Storage Bench 2011 - Heavy Workload, mainly focuses on peak IO performance and basic garbage collection routines. There is a lot of downloading and application installing that happens during the course of this test. Our thinking was that it's during application installs, file copies, downloading and multitasking with all of this that you can really notice performance differences between drives.

We tried to cover as many bases as possible with the software incorporated into this test. There's a lot of photo editing in Photoshop, HTML editing in Dreamweaver, web browsing, game playing/level loading (Starcraft II & WoW are both a part of the test) as well as general use stuff (application installing, virus scanning). We've included a large amount of email downloading, document creation and editing as well. To top it all off we even use Visual Studio 2008 to build Chromium during the test. The test has 2,168,893 read operations and 1,783,447 write operations. The IO breakdown is as follows:

AnandTech Storage Bench 2011 - Heavy Workload IO Breakdown
IO Size % of Total
4KB 28%
16KB 10%
32KB 10%
64KB 4%

Only 42% of all operations are sequential, the rest range from pseudo to fully random (with most falling in the pseudo-random category). Average queue depth is 4.625 IOs, with 59% of operations taking place in an IO queue of 1. The full description of the test can be found here.

AnandTech Storage Bench 2011 - Heavy Workload

Heavy Workload 2011 - Average Data Rate

AnandTech Storage Bench 2011 - Light Workload

Our light workload actually has more write operations than read operations. The split is as follows: 372,630 reads and 459,709 writes. The relatively close read/write ratio does better mimic a typical light workload (although even lighter workloads would be far more read centric). There's lots of web browsing, photo editing (but with a greater focus on photo consumption), video playback as well as some application installs and gaming. The I/O breakdown is similar to the heavy workload at small IOs, however you'll notice that there are far fewer large IO transfers.

AnandTech Storage Bench 2011 - Light Workload IO Breakdown
IO Size % of Total
4KB 27%
16KB 8%
32KB 6%
64KB 5%

Light Workload 2011 - Average Data Rate

Even with our older (generally less demanding) workloads, the M550—like the M500—don't really stack up all that well compared to the top performers. Provided the pricing is right, we can overlook a lot of this, but if you're after top performance there are definitely better SSDs.

Performance vs Transfer Size Power Consumption
Comments Locked

100 Comments

View All Comments

  • hojnikb - Tuesday, March 18, 2014 - link

    You forgot plextor m5pro xtreme in top tier :)
  • extide - Tuesday, March 18, 2014 - link

    Oh Yeah, totally forgot about that one :)
  • kyuu - Tuesday, March 18, 2014 - link

    The 840 EVO is a damn good performer, and the Seagate 600 gives you a damn good capacity/price ratio (I bought the 240GB for $130 the other week). Otherwise, looks good.
  • jed22281 - Friday, March 21, 2014 - link

    When it comes to perf. "overall", not all those are absolute top-tier, some of them should be in a upper-mid-tier category.
    There's only approx. 3 that could truly be considered as absolute top-tier: Extreme II & Ocz 150 are 2 of them.
  • jay401 - Tuesday, March 18, 2014 - link

    Regarding your price comparison chart on the Final Words page: At the time of publication, the Samsung 840 EVO 256GB drive is listed at $139.99 on Amazon.com and has been for a couple days.
  • Kristian Vättö - Tuesday, March 18, 2014 - link

    We are only using NewEgg for comparisons as otherwise it takes ages to do the chart. Besides, the pricing can change on daily basis so it would only be accurate for a short while. The idea is to give a rough idea of pricing -- ultimately every buyer should do their decision based on the current deals.
  • jay401 - Wednesday, March 19, 2014 - link

    Understood. In this case though, Amazon's had it that cheap for about a week now. :)
  • venk90 - Tuesday, March 18, 2014 - link

    INSANELY GOOD DEAL ON AMAZON !

    The 512 GB crucial m550 SSD is listed at 169$ !!
    Buy it now before the prices are corrected !
  • dave_the_nerd - Tuesday, March 18, 2014 - link

    Wow... bought. Worst case, I'll return it, but... damn.
  • venk90 - Tuesday, March 18, 2014 - link

    I bought 20 !
    Going to E-Bay all of them or return it worst case !

    Greedy me ? Haha !

Log in

Don't have an account? Sign up now