Final Words

It's great to see that Intel has not forgotten the enthusiast market. While the SSD 520 and SSD 530 weren't bad SSDs, they didn't exactly fill the shoes of X-25M—they were just another batch of SandForce drives, with more generally better validation. With the SSD 730 Intel finally provides a solution that's capable of filling the shoes that have been left empty for more than two years. However, the SSD 730 doesn't provide anything substantial in the terms of performance like the X-25M did.

The performance consistency of the SSD 730 is brilliant but nothing we've not seen from other OEMs before, and the consistency comes at the cost of peak performance. Even though consistency is an important metric regardless of the workload, I would say peak performance is still the dominant factor in most cases as client IO tends to happen in bursts, whereas in enterprises it's more of a constant flow of IO requests.

On top of that, the SSD 730 lacks some features that other high-end drives have. There is no TCG Opal 2.0 or eDrive support to enable proper hardware encryption, which is something that's slowly becoming a norm. Many companies and governments require encryption in all drives they use and that's a market the SSD 730 misses, although that was never its target market. Another weakness is the high power consumption, although neither that or the lack of encryption support plays a big role in the desktop market.

However, given that laptops and other portables cover most of the market nowadays, I feel it's not the best choice to completely rule that market out. Much like the Skulltrail platform whose logo adorns the SSD 730, this targets a very specific enthusiast niche, and the prices not surprisingly are going to be higher than "typical" consumer SSDs.

NewEgg Price Comparison (2/25/2014)
  240/256GB 480/512GB
Intel SSD 730 (MSRPs) $249 $489
Intel SSD DC S3500 $300 $605
Intel SSD 530 $180 $399
Intel SSD 335 $200 N/A
OCZ Vector 150 $210 $445
OCZ Vertex 460 $190 $360
Samsung SSD 840 EVO $190 $300
Samsung SSD 840 Pro $215 $410
Crucial M500 $136 $275
SanDisk Extreme II $233 $450
Seagate SSD 600 $130 $380

MSRPs are fairly high but as usual should be taken with a grain of salt. We are definitely dealing with premium pricing (though nothing close to the enterprise prices) but the SSD 730 is still rather competitive with the other high-end drives. Intel likely views the OCZ Vector 150 and SanDisk Extreme II as direct competitors and is hence pricing the SSD 730 accordingly.

All in all, the SSD 730 is a competitive option for users who seek maximum performance consistency but don't care about power consumption or encryption support. You'll have to sacrifice peak performance and the lack of an M.2 PCIe option may further limit the appeal in the long run. Given Intel's track record and the best-in-class endurance, the SSD 730 is best for the no-compromise enthusiasts and professionals who really need a reliable and consistent drive.

Power Consumption
Comments Locked

96 Comments

View All Comments

  • wpcoe - Monday, December 8, 2014 - link

    I bought the 240GB version at Fry's last Thursday for US$98.00. I figure that at 40¢/GB how bad can it be.
  • amddude10 - Thursday, November 27, 2014 - link

    Why does Intel list this as not having "enhanced power loss protection" for either size of the drive? I found no mention of power loss protection on Intel's own product information listing for this. By contrast, the listings for the old 320, S3500, and S3700 show that they do have "enhanced power loss protection." This article states that the 730 has "similar" power loss protection to the S3700, so why isn't this listed on the intel product info page for the 730? This isn't another case of a company letting reviewers believe something other than what is the case, is it? Here's the link: http://ark.intel.com/products/81039/Intel-SSD-730-...
  • mohaba - Friday, December 19, 2014 - link

    I'm curious to know the same thing. Every review across the internet mentions that feature, as well as the lack of encryption support and using HET nand, yet the intel documentation is exactly the opposite. I see intel did a documentation update in december.
  • Kob - Saturday, February 27, 2016 - link

    The critical difference between the info provided in this current review and Intel's own specs at
    http://ark.intel.com/products/81039/Intel-SSD-730-...
    regarding enhanced power-loss protection and encryption support diminishes the the trust in Intel public information and reviews in generals.
    See what Intel had to say on this in early 2015, and even after that they did not change their official specs as on 2/27/16. What gives?
    http://www.hardwarecanucks.com/news/storage-news/r...
  • NvidiaWins - Saturday, June 20, 2015 - link

    Intel is the only SSD manufacturer that didn't fail the stress test, every other SSD vendor FAILED miserably!! http://www.extremetech.com/computing/173887-ssd-st...
    I own 3 of the 520 series Cherryville 240GB's, 2 are almost 3 years old and still @100% life.
  • The Gambler - Wednesday, August 12, 2015 - link

    Hmm. I did put my 730 into a laptop. But considering how power hungry my laptop is anyway, it pretty much stays plugged in all the time.

    I could use it on my other PC, but that's a 10-year old Dell Dimension that recently got an HDD upgrade for archival purposes. No use there really.

Log in

Don't have an account? Sign up now