Right now we have full data on four phones and partial data on a few more. We are working to compile as much data as possible to provide an overall look at the quality of audio from smartphones available today. The largest difference in current models is the power of the headphone output as some are much better equipped to drive more demanding headphones than others. As we compile data on more and more products we hope to see more differences arise.

We also have not seen much difference with different loads applied to the headphones. We will continue to test all three sets of headphones but the data here is for the Apple Earbuds. If different loads provide different results, then we will certainly report those different numbers in the future. It also appears that running Android phones in the automated routine causes the 20 kHz tone to be left out of the frequency response test. Humans usually can't hear this, I certainly can't, and so there isn't a huge amount of real-world ramification to this. It causes the reported THD+N to exclude that tone and provides a better result that phones that play it back. For the future, this will be done manually.

Here are the four phones we currently have, and more phones are being tested and reported on as quickly as possible to be added here.

Nexus 5 and LG G2 Issues Wrapping Up
Comments Locked

188 Comments

View All Comments

  • psuedonymous - Monday, December 9, 2013 - link

    Any chance of a test/roundup of bluetooth receivers?
  • Impulses - Monday, December 9, 2013 - link

    I'd love to see that.
  • deathdemon89 - Monday, December 9, 2013 - link

    I do hope you consider providing the audio tests in the main review on the day it's published, as opposed to tacking it on later. I usually read reviews only once, i.e. on the day they are published and don't keep returning to individual reviews looking for updates, so this would be a major data point readers like me would not be able to take advantage of.
  • DanNeely - Monday, December 9, 2013 - link

    I wouldn't hold my breath. Chris H isn't a typical smartphone reviewer. As a result getting these results at initial launch time would require either buying additional sets of test equipment for the reviewers, buying an additional phone for Chris H to do audio testing on, or delaying the article to ship the phone to Chris H after completing the rest of the testing work.

    Audio precision won't let you see pricing information without creating an account on their website. That suggests it's painfully expensive and that getting multiple copies of the hardware won't happen. Getting multiple copies of the phone isn't cheap either and is probably not going to happen except perhaps for a few halo devices. With the peanut gallery raging about any reviews that don't make it out on release day, I'm doubtful that anandtech would choose to delay reviews for a few days for a specialized test.
  • Impulses - Monday, December 9, 2013 - link

    Ehh, I agree, if it's not realistic to have this testing the day the review is out it's no big deal... If it's a deal breaker for you then you'd wait the same amount of time either way, and if it's not (probably the majority of readers) then there's no point in making the rest wait.
  • xaml - Saturday, December 14, 2013 - link

    "Chris H isn't a typical smartphone reviewer. As a result getting these results at initial launch time would require either buying additional sets of test equipment for the reviewers, buying an additional phone for Chris H to do audio testing on, or delaying the article to ship the phone to Chris H after completing the rest of the testing work."

    Or buying an additional Chris H...
  • cheinonen - Monday, December 9, 2013 - link

    Having this on the day-of is going to be a challenge for a number of reasons.

    - Brian is in Arizona, and I'm in Oregon. If there is only a single review sample, I have to get it from him.
    - As mentioned, the Audio Precision is ridiculously expensive. I think the APx 582 used starts at $19,000 before adding the HDMI, Bluetooth, and Digital modules I use (I need it for receivers as well). Audio Precision is just a few minutes from my house and they've been nice enough to let me come in, test everything there, and endlessly bother their QA people to get this right. However, as I have to come in I have to schedule that, and it takes time.
    - That also makes it far easier to do a batch of these at a time than one at a time. If I had at APx at home it would be easier but right now that's not possible.

    So we will try to get all the data, as fast as possible, into the system, but day-of is going to be a logistical challenge. I'd rather have it be accurate than be fast.
  • cheinonen - Thursday, December 12, 2013 - link

    OK, I shouldn't say ridiculously expensive. However, the instrument we use costs enough that it's not feasible for us to have them for myself, Anand, Brian, and everyone else that needs one for testing. The Audio Precision gear ranges from $6K to $50K+ depending on what you need and the price still means we can't outfit everyone with one. So testing will happen as fast as possible, but likely won't run with the reviews when they are initially posted.
  • Bobs_Your_Uncle - Monday, December 9, 2013 - link

    This audio bench is a tool of truly significant value to anyone hoping to arrive at the best, most fully informed purchasing decision possible. Given the respect & high regard that AT has earned throughout the tech sector, this audio initiative raises the bar for more than smartphone manufacturers alone.
    Along these lines, does AT have any plans to initiate a similar audio bench for the various motherboard lines that have recently implemented enhanced audio capabilities?
    These are very positive steps toward driving advances in fundamental, yet long neglected platform capabilities. However, as improvements in audio reproduction are realized, there will still remain one critical, & seemingly intractable obstacle to overcome; What's it going to take for the recording industry to give up on compression & adopt a regimen of decent mastering.?
    It'd be a shame if the only thing audiophile-grade tech revealed was just how badly most studios butcher great music through compression & lousy mastering.
  • Impulses - Monday, December 9, 2013 - link

    I think that battle's beyond Anandtech'srealm, though the more cognizant the average reader/listener is the better.

Log in

Don't have an account? Sign up now