A Great Display

Wrapping up our testing, we have the display along with some figures for temperatures and noise levels. Starting with the display, I actually have a problem with my i1 Display2 colorimeter – it reports numbers, but the calibration is all messed up. I have another colorimeter, an older DTP-94 that still works well, but it doesn't work with ColorEyes Display Pro under 64-bit Windows. What I ended up doing was measuring the white and black levels with the DTP-94 using a separate PC (an old laptop running Windows XP), which also give me contrast, but I don't have Delta E or gamut numbers right now.

At some point we will be moving towards a better test regimen for laptop displays, similar to what we do on tablets and smartphones. Most users don't have a colorimeter, so the out-of-box experience is far more important than the calibrated result – and nearly all displays calibrate fairly well. This will hopefully help to encourage the laptop manufacturers to put more effort into delivering good quality calibrated displays, similar to what we've seen from Apple with their latest iPad, iPhone, iMac, and MacBook Retina products. And with that said, here are the brightness and contrast graphs.

LCD Analysis - Contrast

LCD Analysis - White

LCD Analysis - Black

The VAIO Pro 13 has a reasonably bright backlight, but we still would like to see maximum white levels of 400 nits, as that helps with outdoor use. This laptop is so targeted at mobility that the lack of a brighter display could definitely be seen as a drawback. As for black levels and the resulting contrast, the LCD does very well, with a contrast ratio of over 1000:1. Acer's S7 potentially has a slightly better display, based on these results, but I think the colors on the Sony are actually a bit better and hopefully I can get the colorimeter situation sorted out soon enough to update this section. Anyway, I do like the Sony display quite a lot and think it's one of the best aspects of the VAIO Pro 13.

Temperatures and Noise Levels

Considering the apparent throttling that was taking place in some tests – at the very least the CPU/GPU are not running anywhere near maximum Turbo speeds – I was curious to see what the temperatures looked like under load. We've seen many an Ultrabook hit 90C or higher under load, but Sony bucks that trend in a serious way. I don't think it's just the cooling either, as the laptop doesn't get exceptionally loud. Instead, it's Sony's firmware favoring lower Turbo Boost levels in order to keep temperatures down. Here's what we found in our stress testing:

After running our stress test all night (and then some), the maximum package temperature ended up at just 76C. That's a result more than a few desktops would be happy to equal, and we're dealing with an extremely thin chassis. Even the airflow from the vent on the side doesn't feel that hot, and covering it with my hand didn't get uncomfortable – and it didn't increase the noise levels or temperatures either! Instead, clock speeds dropped slightly and the system continued chugging happily along at 76C or less.

As for noise levels, at idle and light loads the fan is off and thus the VAIO Pro 13 is completely silent. Once the CPU temperature hits I think 40C or more, the fan begins to spin, and in most cases it will be at the minimum speed, which results in a noise level of 32dB from a distance of around 18 inches (45cm). The fan speed and resulting noise levels begin ramping up until the fan is running at maximum at 50C or higher, with a resulting noise level of 42dB. It's a gradual ramp in fan speed as well, which is nice to see – a lot of laptops have three or four discrete speeds with a substantial difference in noise levels at each speed. Considering this isn't really a laptop designed for complex computational tasks (not that it can't do some of them, but it's no mobile workstation), most users will find the laptop typically runs at very low fan speeds or even silently.

 

Sony VAIO Pro 13: Excellent Battery Life Conclusion: Road Warrior
Comments Locked

106 Comments

View All Comments

  • JarredWalton - Wednesday, October 16, 2013 - link

    Okay, not sure if 50 feet is accurate or not -- it works within my house fine. Leave my house, though, and you're right: WiFi performance goes to basically nothing. I'll update the review with some additional information.
  • juhatus - Wednesday, October 16, 2013 - link

    On the gigantic sony vaio pro 13-tread it was mentioned that most people don't have problems with 5Ghz-channels. Are you using 5ghz or 2.4ghz? I have been using the 2.4Ghz 802.11N and have not noticed (after driver upgrade) any slowdowns.. but im only using it for normal surfing.

    http://forum.notebookreview.com/sony-owners-lounge...
  • JarredWalton - Wednesday, October 16, 2013 - link

    5GHz range and performance is better than 2.4GHz in my limited testing, but range of 5GHz isn't much better -- maybe 5-10 feet. I've tested other laptops where 2.4GHz band reaches about 50 feet farther than 5GHz, so something is fishy when 2.4GHz has less range. I don't know if it's Intel's drivers or something else, though.
  • TinHat - Sunday, December 1, 2013 - link

    I've heard a lot of talk about interference from USB 3. Do you think poorly shielded components might be at play here?
  • 7heF - Wednesday, October 16, 2013 - link

    I get better performance on short range with 5 GHz. But the range ain't good on either 2.4 or 5. In the office where there are quite many networks, I'm down to no connection at all after 50 feet with just one light wall between me and the AP. At the same time/place, I can get 30+ Mbps with a another pc with other pc's with Intel wifi.

    On battery, wifi is sett to "max performance" in the power options. This can make a impact on some systems.
  • juhatus - Wednesday, October 16, 2013 - link

    I just read about this on http://www.trustedreviews.com/asus-rt-ac68u-802-11... on the comments:

    "The broadband noise emitted from a USB 3.0 device can affect the SNR and limit the sensitivity of any wireless receiver whose antenna is physically located close to the USB 3.0 device. This may result in a drop in throughput on the wireless link."

    http://www.usb.org/developers/whitepapers/327216.p...

    Are you people using the usb 3.0 ports on either end? (at the router or laptop)
  • 7heF - Wednesday, October 16, 2013 - link

    No.
  • jaff32 - Wednesday, October 16, 2013 - link

    I hear a lot of people complaining about the bad WiFi on the Vaio Pro. If you're signal is excellent then any crappy WiFi solution will work well but when signal strength get weak, the Vaio Pro struggle a lot. That's definitely very bad for a road warrior where you're going to encounter many places with weak WiFi signals.

    If you never leave your house with your notebook then the WiFi issues may not be apparent but then you wouldn't really be looking for a "Pro" notebook anyway.
  • meacupla - Wednesday, October 16, 2013 - link

    While the MSRP is $1250, I have seen this on sale for $1150, which hurts less and puts it closer to surface pro 2, in terms of a complete package.

    And these new vaio pros are extremely light for their size compared to SP2.
  • Amkitsaw - Wednesday, October 16, 2013 - link

    I apologize if you already said this, but what is the total weight (and dimensions) with the sheet battery?

Log in

Don't have an account? Sign up now