Gaming Benchmarks

Metro2033

Our first analysis is with the perennial reviewers’ favorite, Metro2033.  It occurs in a lot of reviews for a couple of reasons – it has a very easy to use benchmark GUI that anyone can use, and it is often very GPU limited, at least in single GPU mode.  Metro2033 is a strenuous DX11 benchmark that can challenge most systems that try to run it at any high-end settings.  Developed by 4A Games and released in March 2010, we use the inbuilt DirectX 11 Frontline benchmark to test the hardware at 1440p with full graphical settings.  Results are given as the average frame rate from a second batch of 4 runs, as Metro has a tendency to inflate the scores for the first batch by up to 5%.

Metro 2033 - One 7970, 1440p, Max Settings

Metro 2033 - One 580, 1440p, Max Settings

Dirt 3

Dirt 3 is a rallying video game and the third in the Dirt series of the Colin McRae Rally series, developed and published by Codemasters.  Dirt 3 also falls under the list of ‘games with a handy benchmark mode’.  In previous testing, Dirt 3 has always seemed to love cores, memory, GPUs, PCIe lane bandwidth, everything.  The small issue with Dirt 3 is that depending on the benchmark mode tested, the benchmark launcher is not indicative of game play per se, citing numbers higher than actually observed.  Despite this, the benchmark mode also includes an element of uncertainty, by actually driving a race, rather than a predetermined sequence of events such as Metro 2033.  This in essence should make the benchmark more variable, but we take repeated in order to smooth this out.  Using the benchmark mode, Dirt 3 is run at 1440p with Ultra graphical settings.  Results are reported as the average frame rate across four runs.

Dirt 3 - One 7970, 1440p, Max SettingsDirt 3 - One 580, 1440p, Max Settings

Civilization V

A game that has plagued my testing over the past twelve months is Civilization V.  Being on the older 12.3 Catalyst drivers were somewhat of a nightmare, giving no scaling, and as a result I dropped it from my test suite after only a couple of reviews.  With the later drivers used for this review, the situation has improved but only slightly, as you will see below.  Civilization V seems to run into a scaling bottleneck very early on, and any additional GPU allocation only causes worse performance.

Our Civilization V testing uses Ryan’s GPU benchmark test all wrapped up in a neat batch file.  We report the average frame rate of a 5 minute test.

Civilization V - One 7970, 1440p, Max SettingsCivilization V - One 580, 1440p, Max Settings

Sleeping Dogs

While not necessarily a game on everybody’s lips, Sleeping Dogs is a strenuous game with a pretty hardcore benchmark that scales well with additional GPU power due to its SSAA implementation.  The team over at Adrenaline.com.br is supreme for making an easy to use benchmark GUI, allowing a numpty like me to charge ahead with a set of four 1440p runs with maximum graphical settings.

Sleeping Dogs - One 7970, 1440p, Max SettingsSleeping Dogs - One 580, 1440p, Max Settings

GPU Conclusions

The main failure of AMD counterparts in our testing scenario is with Civilization V, which loves single threaded performance.  In all other tests, the A10-6800K with the F2A85XN-WiFi is a good choice in single discrete GPU testing.

Computation Benchmarks GIGABYTE F2A85XN-WiFi Conclusion
Comments Locked

31 Comments

View All Comments

  • ShieTar - Wednesday, August 21, 2013 - link

    "The main failure of AMD counterparts in our testing scenario is with Civilization V, which loves single threaded performance."

    The word "failure" seems a bit harsh when the CPU allows you to play at close to 60 FPS on 1440p in a game that does not even require fast responses.
  • Alan G - Wednesday, August 21, 2013 - link

    Nice review. I've done three builds now with the Intel equivalent of this board and it's really a nice board (one office PC and two HTPCs). The WiFi is exceptional and there have been no dropouts at all. Fortunately on the Intel board the 4 pin power connector is in a more manageable space.
  • Joel Kleppinger - Wednesday, August 21, 2013 - link

    I think this missed the biggest reason to do this review... comparing against other mini-ITX systems in cases that don't support graphics cards. That's where this setup is truly interesting. It felt more like a CPU review with a motherboard review tacked onto it and missed the uniqueness this combo could offer.
  • arthur449 - Wednesday, August 21, 2013 - link

    For the boot time tests, is Windows 7 being installed with the UEFI boot option?
  • arthur449 - Wednesday, August 21, 2013 - link

    I ask because, in my experience with UEFI BIOSes, going with a UEFI installation and disabling the Legacy boot options speeds up POST times considerably.
  • torp - Wednesday, August 21, 2013 - link

    Why no power consumption tests with no video card?
  • porto32 - Wednesday, August 21, 2013 - link

    How long does GIGABYTE usually take to stop providing BIOS updates? Looking at some of their older boards on their site shows the latest BIOS is a beta BIOS and was only less than a year from the initial BIOS date. Providing a beta BIOS as the latest version doesn't very good either.
  • lichoblack - Thursday, August 22, 2013 - link

    The Motherboard specs in Newegg list it as also supporting Bluetooth from the same miniPCIe. Is that info incorrect?
  • davegraham - Friday, August 23, 2013 - link

    does this support Registered/ECC memory?
  • Lazzerman - Friday, August 30, 2013 - link

    I just built a HTPC with this board. Works like a charm! One thing to think about though, I bought the "Streacom FC8S EVO Silver", fanless HTPC case. The case uses 4 heatpipes connected to the CPU, but due to the placing of the ATX connector on this MB, I could only connect 3 heatpipes. No big deal, but had I known before I might had choosen another board.

Log in

Don't have an account? Sign up now