ASUS PB278Q Review: An IPS Competitor Emerges
by Chris Heinonen on November 19, 2012 11:00 PM ESTASUS PB278Q Input Lag and Power Use
Unlike the prior 27” displays that we've tested, the ASUS has a 1:1 pixel mapping mode and a full stretch mode for 1920x1080 content. This finally allows me to test and see if the issue with higher lag on 27” displays is being caused by stretching the 1920x1080 signal to fill a 2560x1440 screen, or if it's the inputs and other hardware causing the issue. The lag numbers for the PB278Q are right about what we’ve been seeing for 27” displays, with 16.7 ms of input lag and 11.5 ms of response time for the pixels. This gives us a total overall delay of 28.2 ms using the DVI input. Switching from Full to 1:1 gives no change in the results at all.
Because of this, it seems that the lag in the 27” displays isn’t caused by running at non-native resolution, at least in this case, but more likely by the electronics that deal with display settings and input switching. So even if you run the ASUS at 2560x1440 instead of 1920x1080, I would guess you will see the same results for lag, which is around 1.5 frames in real-world use.
I also did some testing of the TraceFree options using the PixPerAn program to see how that impacts motion blur. The default setting is 60 (and why a control goes from 0-100 but only allows 6 settings is a whole different discussion) and that provided the best results to my eyes. Settings below that lead to more blurring of the pixels behind the car, and settings above that lead to artifacts around the car. TraceFree offers no change to the lag timing but does provide an improvement for motion blurring.
Power use on the ASUS is almost as good as I have seen on a 27” display to this point. With a full white screen it is a little lower than the Dell U2713HM, and with a black screen it is only 1 watt more. Of course the Dell has a higher level of light output than the ASUS does, so if I were to test it at 300 nits it would likely use even less power than the ASUS does for the same level of light output. This is probably only a difference of 1-2 watts at the most, so they really use the same amount of power.
Even if the Dell is the same for power use, the ASUS still uses very little power relative to almost any other 27” display out there, and it will do a good job of keeping your power draw low.
Facebook
Twitter
RSS
55 Comments
View All Comments
wtg2424 - Tuesday, November 20, 2012 - link
Not in the US their notlowlymarine - Tuesday, November 20, 2012 - link
Setting aside my desire to slap you for your abuse of the English language, yes they definitely are:http://accessories.ap.dell.com/sna/productdetail.a...
MrSpadge - Tuesday, November 20, 2012 - link
Hurt me as well.. and I'm not a native speaker.steveotron - Tuesday, November 20, 2012 - link
That's been the occasional sales price on Dell's Australia site. The U.S. site has not had a sale on the U2713HM yet (there were a few 10% coupons that worked).wtg2424 - Tuesday, November 20, 2012 - link
I did get mine for $715 plus a $35 gift card though so I'm not complaining. This thing is freaking awesome!!Peanutsrevenge - Tuesday, November 20, 2012 - link
Blah blah blah.Where are the next gen of monitors with ultra thin bezels like the apparent vaporware LG DM92?
We're in the era of multi monitors, where for many people bezel thickness isn't a major issue for work related stuff, but for others and especially gamers, the bezel just destroys the joy that could be had with multi-monitor gaming.
What is it that's holding back the next step? I just don't understand the issue given that we're seeing it at the extremes, phones and TVs.
Calista - Tuesday, November 20, 2012 - link
Myself I wonder when screens with higher pixel density will start to arrive. I don't expect higher resolution than 2560x1600 (no common interface to drive those resolutions exist today), but 2560x1600/1440 at maybe ~23-24" should be possible and very desirable. A 30" display is almost uncomfortable big.darkling - Tuesday, November 20, 2012 - link
Yes, I agree. I've been actively waiting for something like 2560x1600 at 24" with a refresh rate greater than 60hz--I know there are limitations with interfaces and RAMDAC, but maybe 85hz?Old_Fogie_Late_Bloomer - Tuesday, November 20, 2012 - link
Here's a third vote for 2560x1600 at 24". Also, wide gamut, please...haukionkannel - Tuesday, November 20, 2012 - link
Well... most likely the next step is 4k monitors, just because they have the same aspect ratio as "normal" HD displays...But when they are affordable I can not say. But at least these are better than normal 1080 displays... Not much, but there is the difference.