ECS Z77H2-AX Overclocking

Note: Ivy Bridge does not overclock like Sandy Bridge.  For a detailed report on the effect of voltage on Ivy Bridge (and thus temperatures and power draw), please read Undervolting and Overclocking on Ivy Bridge.

Experience with ECS Z77H2-AX

Previous overclocking attempts on ECS motherboards have not entirely been successful – the name ECS does not exactly scream with an overclocking heritage.  If your company background is based in OEM and B2B sales, overclocking expertise is probably not at the front of the mind when a motherboard is made.  Despite this, ECS recently paired up with overclocking league website HWBOT as a sponsor and has run competitions for users using ECS motherboards as well as users to win ECS motherboards.  Results in these competitions were a little mixed, with the winners having to modify the motherboards physically to reach the best scores.  No doubt ECS learned a lot from the competition, as well as invested in the winners via consultancy regarding overclocking.

To put this into perspective, the ECS Z77H2-AX I had in for review overclocked very easily on the CPU, hitting 4.7 GHz at 1.200 volts (OS at full CPU loading) similar to most of the other boards in our testing.  With regards memory, we had issues running our very aggressive DDR3-2400 9-11-11 kit at XMP – no matter our timings or voltages, the kit would not run at these settings.  In the end, we settled for DDR3-2133 10-12-12, which could limit the motherboard in some of our benchmark suite.

Unfortunately, ECS has not decided to put in any automatic overclocking settings – no way of selecting a predefined set of options for your processor.  The only way to overclock properly is through the BIOS, where all the options are in a trio of menus that are easy to navigate between.  There is some overclocking software as part of the package, but it only allows BCLK adjustment.

One note I should point out – similar to the testing with the ASUS P8Z77-V Premium, during the testing of this motherboard we had an uncommonly bright and warm day, causing ambient temperatures to raise from 15°C to 25°C, and humidity to also rise.  As a result, overclocking on this system hit its peak earlier than in other environments.  Unfortunately it is not common for residential properties in the UK to have air conditioning either, so we had to make do with an additional pair of powerful fans to aid cooling.

Methodology:

Our standard overclocking methodology is as follows.  We select the automatic overclock options and test for stability with PovRay and OCCT to simulate high-end workloads.  These stability tests aim to catch any immediate causes for memory or CPU errors.

For manual overclocks, based on the information gathered from previous testing, starts off at a nominal voltage and CPU multiplier, and the multiplier is increased until the stability tests are failed.  The CPU voltage is increased gradually until the stability tests are passed, and the process repeated until the motherboard reduces the multiplier automatically (due to safety protocol) or the CPU temperature reaches a stupidly high level (100ºC+).

Our test bed is not in a case, which should push overclocks higher with fresher (cooler) air.  We also are using Intel's All-in-one Liquid Cooler with its stock fan.  This is a 120mm radiator liquid cooler, designed to mimic a medium-to-high end air cooler.

Manual Overclock:

To start with, we adjust the CPU multiplier to 44x and the CPU voltage in the BIOS to 1.100 volts as we have done in our other Z77 testing.  With the ECS Z77H2-AX, we also adjusted the VDroop to disabled.  In order to apply a fixed value for the voltage, the voltage mode was set to ‘Ignore SVID’.

At the 44x CPU multiplier, the system was stable at 1.100 volts showing 1.164 volts at load when VDroop was disabled.  Peak temperatures observed were 82°C during PovRay and 83°C during OCCT.

At the 45x CPU multiplier, the system was stable at 1.100 volts showing 1.164 volts at load when VDroop was disabled.  Peak temperatures observed were 81°C during PovRay and 82°C during OCCT.

At the 46x CPU multiplier, the system was stable at a minimum of 1.100 volts set in the BIOS, showing 1.164 volts at load when VDroop was disabled.  Peak temperatures observed were 82°C during PovRay and 83°C during OCCT.

At the 47x CPU multiplier, the system was stable at a minimum of 1.125 volts set in the BIOS, showing 1.200 volts at load when VDroop was disabled.  Peak temperatures observed were 87°C during PovRay and 90°C during OCCT.

Unfortunately we were not able to get the 48x multiplier stable, and at a BIOS voltage of 1.200 volts, we saw 1.272 volts on the CPU at load and 97°C during PovRay before the system reported a memory error.

ECS Z77H2-AX In The Box, Voltage Readings EVGA Z77 FTW Overview, Visual Inspection, Board Features
Comments Locked

24 Comments

View All Comments

  • Namesblank - Tuesday, July 26, 2022 - link

    10 years later, people be looking for how to build system with 20+ GPUs lmao
  • mayankleoboy1 - Wednesday, August 22, 2012 - link

    Where are the GPGPU benchmarks? AFAIK, those are affected by the PCIE 3.0 bandwidth, as shown in the HD7970 review.

    Games are more or less happy with a PCIE2.0 x8 .
  • MrSpadge - Thursday, August 23, 2012 - link

    A few GP-GPU apps are affected, most aren't. Even PCIe 3 is slow as hell from the perspective of the GPU, so you try to avoid external communication as much as possible.
  • TimoKyyro - Wednesday, August 29, 2012 - link

    I was hoping to see some GPU rendering too. I'm using CUDA on Blender and I really need more GPU power. It would be nice to know if there is a difference between 4x 680 or 2x 690 on different PCIe setups.
  • extide - Wednesday, August 22, 2012 - link

    Thanks for providing the diagrams of lane routing. I wish ALL manufacturers would supply a diagram with their boards so you know how to set it up when you are building a system. Sadly, these diagrams are the exception, not the rule. :(
  • processinfo - Wednesday, August 22, 2012 - link

    For me only EVGA seems worth consideration (I don’t like a fan on chipset though).

    I have few requirements that others do not meet.

    I want PS/2 keyboard port (don’t care about mouse). I don’t see it as legacy. It is still superior to USB for keyboard. Works on interrupts instead of pulling, allows as many keys pressed without ghosting as you wish (know it probably does not matter in real life but I like that anyway).

    Display port output is mandatory for me these days. While it is true that this kind of mobo will run dedicated graphics card (or more than one for that matter) I like to have output here for possibility to use it with CPU graphics if my graphic cards breaks and needs replacement (I had that happen and waited almost two weeks for new one). HDMI is no go because does not support high enough resolution.

    Gigabyte is out for me because audio chip. Maybe it is better but it does not do 7.1 and I will lose two channels in my Tiamat 7.1 headset.
  • rwpritchett - Wednesday, August 22, 2012 - link

    You should check out some of the newer USB keyboards. I don't know how they do it, but some of them can now do full NKRO without PS/2. My Nighthawk X9 can do full NKRO over USB.
  • processinfo - Thursday, August 23, 2012 - link

    Interesting but this is not possible with standard USB keyboard protocol. If it does that it has to use some tricks and most likely custom keyboard driver.

    Also I have Thermaltake Meka G1 that I like and I purchased because I got tired replacing membrane keyboards so I rather buy motherboard with PS/2 then new keyboard.

    My point is that at this price point and clearly meant for gamers (who else is using more than one graphic card in non-workstation pc) they should think about such details especially when they go overboard with other ports, e.g., who needs all 4 kinds of display output on gaming mobo, or 10 USB ports on back plate alone (if you need plenty you can have them on bracket connected to header).
  • MacGyverSG1 - Wednesday, August 22, 2012 - link

    I loved the review. The G1.Sniper 3 was on my short list for a while. Could get back on, though.

    I'm waiting for the ASUS Maximus V Extreme to get tested next.

    I only need a motherboard to complete my new build. I plan on running this new rig for 6+ years so I want a board that can keep up with the times.
  • just4U - Thursday, August 23, 2012 - link

    I am staying away from the Rampage/Maximus lines from Asus this time out as Gigabyte has pretty much brought better value accross the board on their gamer boards. I don't expect Asus to catch up till the next chipset..

Log in

Don't have an account? Sign up now