NVIDIA GeForce GTX 670 Review Feat. EVGA: Bringing GK104 Down To $400
by Ryan Smith on May 10, 2012 9:00 AM ESTMetro: 2033
Paired with Crysis as our second behemoth FPS is Metro: 2033. Metro gives up Crysis’ lush tropics and frozen wastelands for an underground experience, but even underground it can be quite brutal on GPUs, which is why it’s also our new benchmark of choice for looking at power/temperature/noise during a game. If its sequel due this year is anywhere near as GPU intensive then a single GPU may not be enough to run the game with every quality feature turned up.
With our second game the GTX 670 already begins to dig itself out of its hole from Crysis. Like the GTX 680 it doesn’t do particularly well here compared to AMD’s best, but it’s enough for a very slight lead on the 7950. At the same time however the GTX 670 falls farther behind the GTX 680, hitting an 8% gap at 2560.
Facebook
Twitter
RSS
414 Comments
View All Comments
CeriseCogburn - Sunday, May 13, 2012 - link
Glad you claim to, the last 4 flagships historical pricing was $499. Time to face the facts you've been avoiding chizow, in order to bolster your conspiracy theory.mevans336 - Thursday, May 10, 2012 - link
If AMD responds with another 7970 like price-drop on the 7950 and can get it down to the low $300 range, I may wind up owning my first AMD card ever. Although, I'm not holding my breath for such a dramatic decrease.Jraptor59 - Thursday, May 10, 2012 - link
I have twice in my life, so far, gotten a AMD card over a Nvidia and regretted it so much I only buy Nvidia now.JlHADJOE - Thursday, May 10, 2012 - link
I've bought AMD once, but was very happy with it.Specifically, a 9500 256bit that unlocked into a 9700.
Kept it for quite a while, skipping Geforce 6 and 7 series, as well has ATI X1 and X2 series. I was very glad I did so, because my next upgrade was the 8800GT which was IMO the best bang-for-the-buck GPU ever made.
just4U - Thursday, May 10, 2012 - link
I buy alot of video cards.. not only for systems I build for others but also for myself.. and on average since the Radeon 8500 I see no reason not to buy from either company.Spunjji - Thursday, May 10, 2012 - link
Agreed; 8500 was a bitch.Spunjji - Thursday, May 10, 2012 - link
Classic! That little 9500 Pro was a beast. Looks like you hit the perfect generation tipping points too, as the 8800GT was a hell of a card.SlyNine - Thursday, May 10, 2012 - link
Than they released the 9600pro, I hated that card to no end (even tho I never bought one).But when I went to build other people computers, and couldn't choose the 9500. It made me sad.
anubis44 - Saturday, May 12, 2012 - link
The 8800GT was a great card, but the 4850 was the best bang for buck card I've seen so far.Spunjji - Thursday, May 10, 2012 - link
What on Earth did you buy that sucked so hard? I'm genuinely interested - I've been buying cards from both sides since the GeForce DDR and the only bad product I ever got was a failtastic G86-based mobile part. That black mark aside both vendors have served me well.