We’ve now covered every service manageable by Server.app, which addresses the core of OS X Server’s functionality. As we mentioned before, though, the Server Admin Tools still expose quite a bit of extra functionality that Server.app still doesn’t manage, and I’ll do my best to cover the services still managed by Server Admin, as well as the rest of the Tools.

There are a few services I’m not going to go over in very much depth: DHCP, DNS, Firewall, NAT, and RADIUS. Below is a very basic explanation of what it is they do, but if you need more information, you can check out the Snow Leopard Server documentation for them. These services are basically unchanged from their earlier implementation, and the documentation is far more thorough than I could hope to be.

DHCP


In case you don’t know what DHCP is: Dynamic Host Configuration Protocol is responsible for automatically assigning and then keeping track of IP addresses for each device on your network. Without DHCP, you’d have to configure every one of your network-attached devices manually, to say nothing of keeping track of which device uses which IP.

For most home and small business users, your router is going to do this for you - nearly all routers have a basic DHCP service, as well as tools for assigning fixed IP addresses to devices on your network.

If you need something a little more advanced, the DHCP service in Lion Server can create different subnets, map static IP addresses, and provide more detailed logs than many routers.

DNS


DNS (Doman Name System) is also IP address-related, in that it redirects IP addresses to more easily-remembered names. That’s why you can type Anandtech.com into your address bar to get here instead of a 12-digit IP address followed by a five-digit port number.

Firewall


The Firewall service lets you block access to ports on your server, as well as for your network and any computers attached to it. Most home users and enterprises are protected by a firewall at the network level, but this can be useful if you want to explicitly allow or deny access to a particular port or ports.

NAT


The Network Address Translation service handles port forwarding, enabling one IP address to host many different services. This is another service usually handled by routers: it’s the reason why multiple computers and other devices can access the Internet despite having only one IP address (to see your true IP address, as opposed to the IP address assigned to your device by your router, you can use a service like whatismyip.com or IP Chicken).
 

RADIUS

 
Remote Authentication Dial-in User Service provides an extra level of authentication and logging to your network, though the service's insistence on AirPort base stations will probably limit its usefulness for most. Basically, once its setup, it allows you to control access to your wireless network using Open Directory user credentials. Handy if you can use it, inconsequential otherwise.
VPN, Web, and Wiki NetBoot, the System Image Utility, and Software Update
Comments Locked

77 Comments

View All Comments

  • Wizzdo - Wednesday, August 3, 2011 - link

    Lion's web server IS Apache. LOL.
  • jigglywiggly - Tuesday, August 2, 2011 - link

    I am too much of an elitist fag to succumb to this.
    I just installed my Debian GUI-less server today to replace my o'll ubuntu 10.04 LTS GUI server, got everyhting setup, mysql, apache, php, samba settings, everything gud to go with only 100 megs of ram usage.
    Sure it took much longer to setup, but I am an elitist fag
  • don_k - Wednesday, August 3, 2011 - link

    Since when is netboot unique to OSX server? Last I checked all *nix variants have had that ability for decades.

    But really, organisations concerned about the sticker price on their server software are not going to go get an apple 'server' for $1k when they can download an iso in 5min and get going are they?
    Not to mention the complete lack of necessary system tools (archiving, compiing especially) without installing macports or something.

    Call it like it is - 1k to manage all those damn pads and phones everyone in the company demands they are able to access the company intranet.
  • johnbouy - Wednesday, August 3, 2011 - link

    Time Machine took a big step backwards with Lion Server. In Snow Leopard Server you could allow time machine backups on individual share points. This allows you to partition a disk and set up individual partitions for specific Time Machine backups. I use this to control how much disk space is allocated for a backup. In Lion you get to nominate one share point/partition as the Time Machine backup storage point. Hence any client that backs up to the server uses the same disk space. A real step backwards!

    Another issue is that Server.app rewets .config files when started up so you potentially lose any changes you were forced to make due to the lousy Lion Web service interface.
  • digitalzombie - Wednesday, August 3, 2011 - link

    I like the idea but still... I wouldn't do it. Apparently they got desperate enough to offer it for 50 bucks. Good job for noticing that no one give a damn since Linux is free and both Linux and Window is established already. I still wouldn't give em my money when they tried to charge in the past an arm and a leg. Who the hell do they think they're going fool? The platform isn't the most active for server development tools. Linux got cloud all up in there and it's actively evolving in many area especially server. Don't even try to bring out that pathetic iCloud. It's not open so nothing is going to back that crap other than Apple, openstack have 50 vendors, big companies, backing that project up compare to iCloud. Apple probably won't ever be able to compete in the server sector but they can leverage their UI and simplicity for their user base, such as the gui sys admin tools described in this articles. They should just stick with consumer base products, trying to compete in the server space market is going to kill em.
  • matthi - Wednesday, August 3, 2011 - link

    On page 4 of this review, it says ".. our next entries are Accounts and Stats under the Status heading". 'Accounts' should be replaced with 'Alerts'.
  • slayernine - Wednesday, August 3, 2011 - link

    If only this was a review of Windows Server it might be useful. I have never met a fellow tech person/geek who uses any version of Apple Server products. (aside from one customer about 3 years ago who was curious about them).

    It is just the simple facts that apple products are know for a lack of an ability to upgrade, locked to features that Apple thinks you should have and a lack of price efficiency. Windows and Linux offer far superior server products that will run on pretty much any hardware that suits your needs and the only reason I can see there being a point to review this product is due to Apple padding your pockets.
  • Schafdog - Wednesday, August 3, 2011 - link

    I know that it seems like Apple (or Steve) has lost faith in the PC as a hub, but I would really love seeing a iTunes Server that multiple users can control using iOS devices playing on Airplay or iOS device itself.

    Some NAS is now getting this features, so I might drop the OS X Server for one of those instead.
  • sodi - Wednesday, August 3, 2011 - link

    What kind of crazy organization would use a Lion Server? At works, standard is a necessity. A Lion Server is just oddball.
  • Oscarcharliezulu - Thursday, August 4, 2011 - link

    This seems a bit like OSX Server Lite and Easy rather than a true upgrade to Snow Leopard Server. I wasPthinking of converting an older 'mini to Lion Server (to serve a small business which has MBPs and iMacs, but now I think getting a copy of Snow Leopard Server would be better if I could somehow get it cheap (yet legal).

Log in

Don't have an account? Sign up now