T-Mobile G2x - The Camera

The G2x’s Froyo ROM had LG’s standard camera app from the O2X and Revolution, but the G2x got bumped back to the stock Android camera app after the Gingerbread update. Maybe they consciously decided to make it as stock as possible (or maybe they just messed up), but for whatever reason, the camera app was changed in the Gingerbread update. The LG camera app is quite good, as we’ve noted previously, but there’s one major annoyance I have with it - after every picture, it asks what you want to do next. If you’re just shooting randomly, it becomes a serious pain. 

The default Android camera app is ugly, but the big problem here is that you lose many of the options present in the LG camera app, including the one to switch from the rear camera to the front facing 1.3MP shooter. Seriously. Remind me again, did I use the phrase “a bit half-baked” to describe the G2x software? This is a problem that definitely needs to be fixed, and soon. The 8.0MP pictures shot with the stock camera app are compressed much higher, with images that end up at roughly 35% of the size of the ones taken with the LG camera app. Also, you can’t shoot video at more than 720p with the stock camera app. In a phone that’s advertised with 1080p video capability (and had it until the update), that’s just unacceptable. I’ve seen some posts on T-Mobile’s forum indicating that some people are using Camera Zoom FX to get the settings and 1080p video recording back, but CZFX can’t switch to the front facing camera and it also costs $4.79. I don’t want to have to pay just to use the camera that worked really quite well until last week. 

So let’s talk about the camera’s abilities, as measured before the update and subsequent crippling of the camera’s abilities from a software standpoint.  As with the Optimus 2X, we were pretty happy with the high framerate of the preview image, it’s definitely one of the more fluid that we’ve come across recently. The pictures themselves are solid, but not particularly exemplary. The window on the battery cover for the camera, I suspect, has a lot to do with this. The test images look soft and yellowed out, for some reason, they’re significantly worse than the images we saw out of the Optimus 2X. I don’t know whether this is isolated to the specific phone I have for testing, because there doesn’t seem to be any significant camera hardware or software differences between the G2x and the O2X. Or maybe it was just a bad set of conditions for the G2x’s camera. In day to day use, the camera is pretty decent, with vibrant and sharp pictures. 

The other thing you need to be careful about with the G2x camera is that the window picks up dirt very, very quickly. This can significantly impact photo quality, so it’s important to clean it out every so often if you want decent pictures. 

The front facing 1.3MP camera is fairly medicore. There’s a lot of noise in the images, as well as a lack of colour saturation. The front facing camera also mirrors the image horizontally. It’s acceptable for video chat and fixing your hair in the elevator, but nothing more.

The G2x is capable of 1080p video (camera application notwithstanding), but it’s not that great. The video comes out soft, and at 1080p, lacks a lot of detail, especially compared to the latest HTC devices and the Droid 3. It’s not a bad video camera, especially for YouTube and Facebook uploading. But the optical hardware and encoder are definitely holding the G2x camera back. 

T-Mobile G2x - The Performance T-Mobile G2x - The Battery
Comments Locked

36 Comments

View All Comments

  • halcyon - Wednesday, August 3, 2011 - link

    ...but, when will you review GS2?

    I know you like to review operator models, but the original non-operator version of GS2 has been out for over three months already and it's the best thing since sliced bread, everybody says.

    I'm sure you could get one directly from Samsung or afford to source one from an online retailer at RRP.

    Really looking forward to that review.
  • quiksilvr - Wednesday, August 3, 2011 - link

    If there is a newer version of Sunspider out why wouldn't the phones be tested on that instead of the old version?
  • bplewis24 - Wednesday, August 3, 2011 - link

    Because if you run all of the new phones on the newer version only, there will be no way to compare them to the old phones run on the older version of the test (unless you re-run every single phone on the new version).
  • Brian Klug - Thursday, August 4, 2011 - link

    We'll eventually move over to the new version as it runs similar tests with a few improvements, but also has a much shorter runtime.

    -Brian
  • MobileMenace - Wednesday, August 3, 2011 - link

    The table lists the screen size as 4.3in, but is actually 4.0.

    Is the Bluetooth streaming fixed for CM7 on G2x? That has kept me from using it, since I use that frequently. I haven't tried it recently, but it seemed to run stable several weeks ago.
  • beepboy - Wednesday, August 3, 2011 - link

    Is that a Honda Dizzy (Distributor), from a Civic engine perhaps?
  • Sansnombre - Wednesday, August 3, 2011 - link

    I see the phone, no big woop -- standard issue -- but what the h is it resting against? Good Lord, is that a distributor, circa 1978?! Or perhaps a mint example of the original electromechanical RAID distributing concept being used as a paperweight/photo accessory . . .
  • VivekGowri - Wednesday, August 3, 2011 - link

    Sixth-gen Accord, actually.
  • Chaser - Wednesday, August 3, 2011 - link

    I love my Sensation :) And T-Mobile gave me an upgrade price for the Sensation that replaced my G2x.
  • aegisofrime - Wednesday, August 3, 2011 - link

    Nope, it's 0.9. I made sure to run the same version as you guys do. Here's the results. Apologies for the URL shortener but as you know the link for the results is fiendishly long.

    http://bit.ly/nh0crN

Log in

Don't have an account? Sign up now