Conclusion: Reliability Above All Else

Taken at face value, the Puget Systems Obsidian is a reasonably solid enterprise-class tower. The very basic configuration keeps costs, power consumption, heat, and noise incredibly low. This is due at least in part to the choice of the Antec Mini P180, which is actually a recent development: older Obsidian machines were built in the Silverstone TJ08. That wasn't exactly a problematic chassis to begin with as Silverstone's cases tend to be fairly well built, smartly engineered, and reasonably priced. The move to the Mini P180 just makes the Obsidian that much quieter, and at least anecdotal experience with Antec suggests replacement parts are extremely easy to come by.

The devil with the Obsidian is, of course, in the details. All told, our review configuration runs about $800 if you buy the parts from NewEgg. Tack a Windows 7 Professional 64-bit license on and you're looking at about $940. That means Puget is making roughly $400 off of systems configured like our review unit. Admittedly that feels a little dicey and is liable to give one pause, but it's important to keep in mind the kind of research and careful engineering that goes into this line specifically, along with the extra service of having an advance spare on hand at all times. This system is intended for business/enterprise customers and there's always a premium to be paid for that.

We do have a few concerns with the targeted business/enterprise customers, however. First, we wonder how many businesses actually want to use this size of desktop tower. Yes, the Antec Mini P180 is a great chassis, but it's also far larger than what most businesses need. If your company wants to add a discrete GPU, that's an option, but there are definitely companies that would rather have PCs that are less than half the size of the Obisidian (and still quiet under most workloads). The second issue is the default warranty. You can tell us that your parts are highly reliable and there's a hot-spare on hand for advance replacement, but given the $400 markup we'd suggest that a 3-year parts warranty should come standard. That's what Dell and HP do for their business PCs, and if you want a piece of that pie you need to compete on all fronts.

Add in the 3-year warranty and our Obsidian review system will set you (or your business) back over $1600. Dell's OptiPlex 990 with similar options will cost around $1100 (using the current and frequently available "instant savings"). The HP Compaq 8200 Elite is priced similar to Dell at $1050. Puget Systems may use a higher quality case with cooling that will run quiet even under heavy loads, and their component choices may be more reliable, but you're paying a substantial premium.

Ultimately, taken at face value the information we've seen from Puget Systems indicates their Obsidian is a highly reliable build that would be ideal for mission critical situations. Yes, you can easily use their research to build your own system using the same parts for a lot less money, but then you're stuck with internal support should a problem arise. It's not the fastest computer on the block and certainly it's unfair to place it in a performance race against the hardcore gaming machines we've compared it to. Puget also provides more customization options that larger OEMs should you have special needs--and that's one area where the P180 chassis is a real benefit. The care that has gone into its design along with the virtually silent operation and excellent service make the Puget Systems Obsidian easy to recommend for business users, provided they can stomach the price.

Build, Noise, Heat, and Power Consumption
Comments Locked

27 Comments

View All Comments

  • dawp - Saturday, April 9, 2011 - link

    in most business environments I've been in, all the business critical apps are run of the server and very little is kept on the local machines, mostly personal settings and files. a raid setup for that is 1 more step and/or headache the IT department would have to take.
  • erple2 - Sunday, April 10, 2011 - link

    The business community has a server to store critical information, and essentially "dumb terminals" (well, slightly smarter than a true thin client) that are essentially "commodity" hardware. For that user, where a re-build costs nearly nothing (image from a central server via network at the touch of a button), and, you're good to go. All "critical" files (business files - proposals, documents etc) are stored in a collaboration area anyway, and that's backed up with RAID 5 or better, plus off site storage, and you only need the apps on the local machine.

    For that user, you don't need RAID on the local machines.
  • PWRuser - Friday, April 8, 2011 - link

    "The configuration our Deluge Mini review unit shipped with (what) makes for an interesting comparison with the Origin Genesis we recently reviewed."
  • flexcore - Friday, April 8, 2011 - link

    Why couldn't they use a power brick for a machine like this that uses such little power? They would get great efficiency and no noise from it? I don't understand why low power office machines and other computers with low power computers don't use power bricks?
  • Taft12 - Sunday, April 10, 2011 - link

    They do. They're called laptops and many large companies provide laptops for most ro all employees.
  • 7Enigma - Tuesday, April 12, 2011 - link

    Limited upgradability most likely. Remember while few there are custom options that would significantly increase the power draw of the system. I agree though that it should be an option if your build has <150w total system draw. For aesthetics they could still have the power brick inside of the case with just the cord coming out, but you'd get the benefits of the higher efficiency/no noise.
  • MadMinstrel - Sunday, April 10, 2011 - link

    I'm not sure what type of office use requires a quad core. Seems like overkill. The five uses of more than two cores are rendering, encoding, web and database servers, some types of scientific calculation and gaming. Machines like the Obsidian are unlikely to ever be faced with one of those. Anything I've missed?
  • bobbozzo - Tuesday, April 12, 2011 - link

    Developers - Visual Studio now supports multi-threaded compilation, and of course gcc has for years.
  • bobbozzo - Tuesday, April 12, 2011 - link

    Besides, Dell and HP are selling quad-core desktops nowadays.

    You can't even get a single-core Dell Latitude anymore in the 14" and above size.
  • shady28 - Sunday, April 10, 2011 - link


    I haven't seen any system reviews on Anand or any of the enthusiast sites that I would consider an enterprise / corporate PC. Occasionally you'll get the corporate laptop - like a Dell E6410/20 or something along those lines, but never a corporate desktop.

    Those, by and large, are the Optiplex series. If you want to see a real corporate desktop, look at the Optiplex 960, or HP Elite series desktops - or the HP thin clients.

    By most enthusiast measures, there are simply well built underpowered PCs. Most of these are still selling with C2D E8400 or E8500 processors and integrated 4500 graphics.

    That's all that's needed in 98% of the offices in corporate america.

Log in

Don't have an account? Sign up now