NVIDIA’s GeForce GTX 590: Duking It Out For The Single Card King
by Ryan Smith on March 24, 2011 9:00 AM ESTBattlefield: Bad Company 2
Now approaching a year old, Bad Company 2 remains as one of the cornerstone DX11 games in our benchmark suite. Based on the Frostbite 1.5 engine, it will be replaced in complexity by the DX10+ only Frostbite 2 engine (and Battlefield 3) later this year. As BC2 doesn’t have a built-in benchmark or recording mode, here we take a FRAPS run of the jeep chase in the first act, which as an on-rails portion of the game provides very consistent results and a spectacle of explosions, trees, and more.
Historically Bad Company 2 favors two patterns in our tests: it favors shader speed, and it just favors AMD in general. Today is no exception, and while the GTX 590 can hit nearly 80fps, that’s still 10fps short of the 6990. Given that it’s normally shader bound our overclocked cards pick up the slack, but it’s not enough—not even the GTX 590 OC can reach the 6990, let alone an overclocked 6990.
Meanwhile our water benchmark gives us a good idea of what minimum framerates are like. Interestingly NVIDIA more than chips away at AMD’s lead here, and the GTX 590 and its overclocked variants top the charts. Given these scores it’s likely we’re approaching a non-GPU bottleneck in the game.
Facebook
Twitter
RSS
123 Comments
View All Comments
Ryan Smith - Thursday, March 24, 2011 - link
There are only 2 reasons this card isn't reference.1) Factory overclock, which we can and will nullify for testing
2) The EVGA backplate. Admittedly I don't have the reference backplate, but the NV backplates shouldn't cause any of our results to differ - the difference is mostly cosmetic.
For this reason, it's "more-or-less" reference. Technically it's not reference, but once we change the clocks it's quite identical in performance.
mariush - Friday, March 25, 2011 - link
Can you explain how can you nullify the modified / improved cooling system of the eVGA compared to reference cards?A reference card with stock voltages/frequencies may still run worse than this eVGA when downclocked, for example because on the reference card the voltage regulators may heat more and throttle the card more often.
Otherwise.... not an ATI fan but it's painfully obvious you're not focusing on this review on things that make this card look bad, like playing on 2 x 1920x1080 monitors or something like that.
Ryan Smith - Friday, March 25, 2011 - link
The cooling on the EVGA isn't any different. With such a mild overclock, they're basically just clocking it up a bit; the voltage and the cooling is no difference from reference.etamin - Thursday, March 24, 2011 - link
Where do you get the MSRPs for all the cards on the first page? I'm never able to find any of them at those prices.etamin - Thursday, March 24, 2011 - link
btw I'm looking at the 6850, 6870, and 6970. They start at $170, $210, and $340 on newegg.Ryan Smith - Thursday, March 24, 2011 - link
I factor in Mail In Rebates. if you don't, that's probably why you see prices differently.Ramon Zarat - Thursday, March 24, 2011 - link
Review title:''NVIDIA’s GeForce GTX 590: Duking It Out For The Single Card King''
Comments in conclusion:
''...and as a result there is no one card that can be crowned king.''
LMAO... How to pretend to say someting and actually mean the complete oppsite!
Now, performance, cost and power ratio is STILL best with the 6990. And that's without even considering multi screen gaming setup. At 1.5Gb Vram, the 590 WILL come up short at 5760 X 1200.
Ramon
Silent_Scone - Thursday, March 24, 2011 - link
But none the less, I think I'll stick with my 580GTX SLi thanks ;)krumme - Thursday, March 24, 2011 - link
REALLY FAST AT 1080 ON HAWXNO NOISE
OVERCLOCK YOURS NOW !!!
freedomsbeat212 - Thursday, March 24, 2011 - link
I hate coming to anandtech sometimes because so many of the comments are from wannabe editors. It's annoying and takes away from the excellent content..Why not have an "email correction" button vs taking it out in the comment section? It's weird, I don't see this anywhere else - you guys must be a particularly anal group...
To go back O/T, I miss the days of powerful sub-$250 graphics cards. There's a market for it but all the action's on the high-end. Remember when the affordable TNT2 would play every recent game at playable framerates?