We had a significant amount of requests for Flight Simulator X results in our Core i5/i7 and P55 coverage. I was able to run some quick comparison results between the Bloomfield and Lynnfield platforms last night to answer most of the email and comments requests. However, I am still running the Phenom II and Core 2 Quad benches. I do not know if we will be able to have those results in our P55 roundups that start in a couple of days. If not, I will follow up with these particular performance updates in another blog.

Test Setup-



We are utilizing our standard P55/X58 setups for this test. The 920/860/870 platforms are using 7-7-7-20 1T DDR3-1600 memory configurations. The 750 platform is running at DDR3-1333 with 6-6-6-18 1T timings since the 12x multiplier is not available on the i5/750. The X58 platform is equipped with 6GB of memory and the P55 with 8GB. Turbo mode and Hyper-Threading is enabled as designed and shipped from Intel. All other BIOS settings are at stock ratios.



We enabled DX10, AA/AF, set the Aircraft, Scenery, Weather, and Traffic sliders to Ultra High, and then measured a pre-recorded six minute flight around Honolulu with FRAPS at 1920x1080. Our variability with this benchmark averages around 0.5%. The benchmark is run five times with the median score reported for our results. FSX responds well to both increases in GPU and CPU improvements, but especially differences in CPU clock speeds.


Gaming Performance - Flight Simulator X

When overclocked to 4.2GHz, the 920 and 860 are basically even in this title. The big differences though are the improvements in frame rates, especially the minimum frame rate with a 36% increase compared to the stock 860/870 results. The average frame rates increase 14~21% over the 860/870 stock results.

Due to very aggressive turbo modes, the 860/870 offer the best performance at stock clock settings. No real surprise there, but the improved turbo mode on the i5/750 does allow it to stay even with the i7/920 in this title. All of the processors offered a very enjoyable gaming experience as minimum frame rates were excellent, especially when the processors were overclocked. For those originally wondering, the i5/750-P55 combination will not have any problems running this title at 1920x1080 resolutions with Ultra High quality settings.


Gallery: P55 / FSX

OCZ Technology

OCZ recently sent us their upcoming DDR3-2400 C9 4GB Blade series kit. The official specifications call for 9-10-9-24 1T timings at 1.65V VDimm on the P55 platform. We tossed it in our Gigabyte GA-P55M-UD2 motherboard with an i7-870 overclocked to 4.2GHz (21x200), set the memory multiplier to 12x for 2400MHz on the memory, and manually set timings to 9-10-9-24 1T, VDimm to 1.65V, VCore to 1.375V, and VTT to 1.370V.





The OCZ DDR3-2400 Blade kit worked perfectly at its rated specifications on one of the least expensive P55 boards you can purchase. We will have further results shortly.


Gallery: OCZ DDR3-2400

TankGuys

I normally do not do this, but we were needing a couple i7/860 processors plus a few additional Intel G2 80GB SSD drives quickly for the 860 review and for the expanded motherboard test suite. Normally, we would go to the larger e-tailers like Newegg or others for these items. Well, I was not satisfied with the pricing or availability on either item, so I hit up Ben at TankGuys to see what he could do for us.

Let's just that TankGuys came through with flying colors. Not only did they ship the items before Newegg had them in stock, but their prices were extremely competitive. We spent $269.99 for our i7/860 compared to $299.99 ($289.99 today) at Newegg. Also,the Intel X25-M G2 80GB SSD was $349.99 at Newegg ($309.99 today) compared to $269.99 at TankGuys when we placed our orders. So, it does pay to shop around and sometimes the smaller guys might just be able to offer better prices than the large resellers.

Comments Locked

40 Comments

View All Comments

  • alexq - Tuesday, September 22, 2009 - link

    Nice to see the smaller resellers are still able to stay competitive, even in this economy. Of course dealing in smaller quantities gives them an edge in a market where the prices fluctuate daily.

    PS. the site seems to be down, after a "mere" mention on anandtech!
  • Kougar - Tuesday, September 22, 2009 - link

    The only fluctuation in prices you see is from the large e-tailers price gouging. Intel sells to everyone at the same price per 1000 unit quantities and that has never changed.

    In fact I can guarantee you Newegg paid less for their Intel SSD's than TankGuys did because Newegg buys in even larger bulk orders.
  • strikeback03 - Wednesday, September 23, 2009 - link

    Plus Newegg did have the G1 drives down to around $230 while the G2s were OOS after the bug was discovered. Once the G2s were available again, both went up to ~$350, and are now back to around $300. Capitalism at work.
  • fjeske - Wednesday, September 23, 2009 - link

    Bought my G2 at CDW for $248 when they had stock last week, out again.
  • yacoub - Tuesday, September 22, 2009 - link

    Why another couple days before the P55 board roundups? Been a couple weeks already. =)
  • Gary Key - Wednesday, September 23, 2009 - link

    I know, sorry about that, got sidetracked with running every benchmark under the sun on the CPU side for the last two weeks among other things. We will start this weekend and continue every few days until all 15 boards are reviewed.
  • jonup - Thursday, September 24, 2009 - link

    You the man Gary! Next time you should just try to get on MB review out just to give us the taste while running all the benches. We are just inpatient spoiled children of the 21st century.
  • yacoub - Wednesday, September 23, 2009 - link

    No worries, just curious. Looking forward to learning whether or not a fix has been found for the NVidia/P55 performance inconsistencies. :)
  • Gary Key - Thursday, September 24, 2009 - link

    Actually, there is not a fix with the NV cards. Based on driver design and certain GPU limited situations, they just perform better on the Phenom II. Turns out the results are just fine and can be expected in certain games.
  • yacoub - Thursday, September 24, 2009 - link

    Oh that's interesting. So i guess we can expect to see all the P55 reviews done with an ATi GPU so it doesn't look bad compared to the Phenom II setup? :)

Log in

Don't have an account? Sign up now