The Components

Bear in mind that this system is an experimental build. So you’ll get to go along for the full ride, including all the gotchas and warts I encountered. Sometimes you learn more from the mistakes and glitches than if everything went smoothly.

First, cost was no object. That didn’t mean I had a bottomless budget, but it did mean I wasn’t going to skimp on components. The goals for the system were pretty simple:

  • Low power usage at idle
  • Good gaming performance
  • Very quiet
  • Relatively small. It would be something you could lug around to LAN parties.

Let’s check out the component list.

Component

Brand / Model

Cost

CPU

Intel Core i5 661

$205

Motherboard

Asus P7H55D-M EVO

$135

CPU Cooler

Scyther Big Shuriken Low

$ 35

Memory

4GB Patriot Viper II Sector 5 DDR3-1600

$110

Graphics Card

XFX Radeon HD 5850

$299

Hard Drive

OCZ Colossus 250GB 3.5” SSD

$849

Optical Drive

Asus BC-08B1ST Blu-ray combo drive

$110

PSU

Cooler Master Silent Plus Pro 500W

$100

Case

Silverstone SG04B-FH

$159

OS

Windows 7 Home Premium OEM x64

$105

Total

 

$2,107

 

That’s over $2,100 for a dual core gaming rig. Of course, for the $850 cost of the SSD, you could practically build a new system. But we’re in the pursuit of knowledge here, so damn the cost and full speed ahead.

Index The Pain of Assembly
Comments Locked

81 Comments

View All Comments

  • GeorgeH - Wednesday, January 27, 2010 - link

    Especially since the stated goal was low power consumption and the 750 consumes ~10W or less than the 661 at idle. He could've saved $10 and gotten a faster, more mature, more power efficient, and cheaper platform.
  • jnmfox - Wednesday, January 27, 2010 - link

    Seems like you dropped a lot to get a SFF build, but like you said the SSD was almost half the cost. I'm sure the SSD really helps with heat and noise, I love my laptop SSD for that reason.

    I've been looking at building a mini-ITX gaming system using the upcoming Sugo SG07, an i3 CPU, and my 4850 for the GPU. Good to read your experiences with the micro ATX build.
  • takumsawsherman - Wednesday, January 27, 2010 - link

    I kind of get it. Vacation is fun. I don't mean the Bahamas. I mean being home with family and being able to enjoy the fruits of your labors and good fortune. You might not want to come back in a full time way, so you don't. I think that sounds like a lot of fun, and look forward to the day where I can do the same.

    At the same time, hiring a "Loyd" was probably a bad idea. There is no value in his writing or "experiments". I don't want to hurt the guy, it's just that Anandtech has had it's share of mediocre articles. This doesn't meet the standard of mediocre.

    Between the fact that there are fewer articles posted than in years past, very few roundups with actual stability and feature testing, Anandtech is getting to be a very boring bookmark to click every day. Someone should be hired who has the time and inclination to get motherboards, memory, video cards, cases, etc., and not just test them and rave about them, but to push back on the vendors to improve them. They should be encouraged to reduce the "inspire a 14 year old" theme that they seem to embrace, and build professional products. Like Tyan used to do. Extended stability testing, checking for bugs regarding QVL memory compatibility (this has been a problem lately) and holding their warranty service to account are all things that Anand has done in the past, and should do again.

    Also, Firewire should be implemented at the highest speed available (currently 800) or the motherboard should be thrown in the garbage :) I include this to let others know that I have not forgotten the true cause.
  • mindless1 - Saturday, January 30, 2010 - link

    I'm in total agreement with the second half of what you wrote!

    As for the first half, the kind of articles you want have to *exist* in order to displace the articles you don't want, and you can opt not to read anything, at any time. Often I know if I want to read a complete article by the end of the first couple paragraphs if the title alone doesn't deter me.

    IOW, more articles is better. So long as Loyd gets click-through there's every reason to keep articles that apparently were of interest to some readers. All visitors to AT are not hardware gurus, everyone had to start somewhere too.
  • blowfish - Wednesday, January 27, 2010 - link

    Lloyd's component choices seem as extravagant as the recent ones he made for his teenage daughter's pc! Could it be there's a pattern developing?

    Without overclocking, there would seem to be no point in the 661 - so I hope there is some follow-up meat to go on the bones of this article.
  • stromgald30 - Wednesday, January 27, 2010 - link

    As with most novice builders, he buys into a lot of the marketing and doesn't yet have the feel for balancing performance across CPU, GPU, RAM, Mobo, and hard drive so that he's not overspending in any one area.
  • alphacheez - Wednesday, January 27, 2010 - link

    Well, he's overspent on basically every component just like he said he would in the article. He's basically taken each component and taken it a step (or more) above the sweet spot of performance per dollar.

    I'd like to see this system compared with a system along the lines of the "budget" component suggestions he makes at the end of the article. How much more are you getting for your money? I have a feeling the expensive system won't be terribly much faster but it might enable a better experience by allowing gaming at a higher resolution and more eye candy, less slowdown when a mechanical hard drive may choke on random reads/writes, etc.

    The i5-661 does seem to be an odd choice to pair with a discrete graphics card since the main benefit of the 661 over the 660 is a higher-clocked integrated GPU which would presumably also increase heat output, power consumption and noise; all things Lloyd is trying to avoid. Is there some ability to switch from the discrete GPU to the integrated CPU that might allow for some power savings when not performing demanding 3D workloads? I know there had been talk of systems along those lines earlier, but I thought those had all been discontinued (or maybe just delayed???).

    I look forward to the followup to this article to see how it actually works out. I personally would get a lower performance computer closer to the $/performance optimum and use the money I saved to allow me to upgrade to a new machine (or newer components) sooner.
  • stromgald30 - Wednesday, January 27, 2010 - link

    I think that may be worth an article. A comparison of real world performance differences between his high end system and a mid-range and budget system with the same case.

    The article seems well written, but there's no meat to this other than Loyd documenting his experiences. For veteran PC builders/tweakers, this isn't all to interesting, and IMHO belongs more in the forums than as an article.
  • pjladyfox - Wednesday, January 27, 2010 - link

    I'm curious as to why you went with the Silverstone SG04B? As you pointed out space is incredibly tight in that enclosure and airflow really is restricted after you put in everything. And that's not even covering the massive cost of the case itself.

    Just glancing at similar cases I see there are better options:

    Antec Mini P180 - $70-$80 via newegg

    Thermaltake VF1000BWS Lanbox - $110 via newegg

    Thermaltake LANBOX Lite VF6000BWS - $80 via newegg

    All of these should have not only given you the size of case you wanted but more room and better airflow.
  • loydcase - Wednesday, January 27, 2010 - link

    The Silverstone SG04 is easily more transportable than the cases you mention. I really wanted to squeeze this a bit. The gating factor was really the size of the graphics card more than anything else, but I wanted small, quiet and low power.

Log in

Don't have an account? Sign up now