Decisions, Decisions

Okay, let's apply room correction based upon the measurements taken earlier. I use a slight slope with 5dB of gain towards sub bass. I did try a flat line approach but found that the bass becomes too thin with the filter applied. Reading over the Audiolense guide, I noticed that there is a suggestion to slope things downward somewhat from low frequency to high frequency and I've found this to be my preference.

Let's have a quick look at the estimated room response for both DACs before we continue further. Unfortunately, Audiolense does not provide an option to record a frequency sweep after the correction has been applied. We've contacted Juice Hi-Fi about this and they've told us they're looking at providing this option in a future update. They did tell us that the estimated result is remarkably accurate based upon tests they've conducted themselves. If such an update is made available, we'll be sure to use the feature to present data in the future if the need arises.

Doede DAC

Opus

There is an unfortunate side effect at this point once the correction is applied to the TDA1543 DAC. The 20dB or so of attenuation applied by the filter means I have to turn the volume control to near maximum to get anywhere near the test volume I was using prior to applying the filters. A 6dB gain switch on the TVC does give me headroom of a couple of clicks, but it's far from optimal. To use this DAC with DRC, you'll either need to stack a number of TDA1543s in parallel or use some kind of gain stage on its output. Still, there's just about enough volume on tap for me to get an idea of its sonic signature in comparison to the earlier sound and in comparison to the WM8741.

With DRC engaged, instruments become far easier to pick out and subtle details are more noticeable at the listening position. The best word to describe the effects of DRC is balance. The other shocker is that the basic nature of both DACs remains the same. The TDA1543 midrange gains more edge definition especially on vocals (not that it needed them). The Opus soundstage gains pinpoint precision with lots of air. Complex passages of music are rendered without any perceivable congestion on both DACs.

Subjective Listening - Arrrgh! Adding in the Subwoofer
Comments Locked

114 Comments

View All Comments

  • Gannon - Monday, December 1, 2008 - link

    I have an X-Fi and it's better then my audigy, mind you I got the more expensive version with front panel and the remote. I use it for everything and have never had a problem, though I don't use vista at all just XP.
  • erikejw - Tuesday, December 2, 2008 - link

    I ripped everything onto my PC and go with a decent soundcard and use digital out and lets my stereo do all the decoding.

    Since good stereos, receivers probably have better AC3 cicruits I thought about coding all my cd wavs to lossless AC3 but never did.

    If you use a 5.1 reciver make sure the stereo wavs does not get converted to 5.1, that really distorts the audio.
  • wjgoodrich - Tuesday, November 20, 2012 - link

    Hi,

    I'm poking around the web looking for a kit that will accept as an input the I2S signal output from a γ1 Modular Miniature DAC kit that I'm putting together (from AMB labs: http://www.amb.org/audio/gamma1/).

    I'm only using this AMB kit for the USB-to-I2S component. My goal is to find a kit valve kit (vacuum tubes) that would act as a I2S to analog DAC headphone amp.

    Anyone? Thoughts?

    Thanks!
    Bill
  • Mekr - Tuesday, March 24, 2015 - link

    I was impressed with your article on ddac by Doede ,& was looking for a trained engineer or electrician ,who could assemble & solder this kit for me,though he can be compensated monetraliy for his services.

Log in

Don't have an account? Sign up now