Overclocking and Performance Scaling

With outstanding performance at stock speed, we pushed the Arctic Cooling HSFs in our performance scaling tests to see if these air-coolers deliver similarly impressive performance when overclocking. As cooling solutions do a better job of keeping the CPU at a lower temperature, it is reasonable to expect the overclocking capabilities of the CPU will increase as cooler performance increases. In each test of a cooler, we measure the highest stable overclock of a standard X6800 processor under the following conditions:

CPU Multiplier: 11x (Stock 11x)
CPU Strap: 266 (stock) or 333 (overclocked)
CPU voltage: 1.5875V at Max overclock
NB Voltage: 1.70V
FSB Voltage: 1.40V
SB Voltage: 1.20V

Memory is set to Auto timings on the P35. This removes memory as any kind of impediment to the maximum stable overclock. As FSB is raised the linked memory speed increases in proportion. For this reason, we maintain memory speed as close as possible to CPU strap settings to prevent memory becoming an issue in CPU testing. This means 3.33GHz uses a 333 strap and runs 10x333, 3.73 uses a 333 strap and runs 11x339, and 3.90 GHz is a 333 strap and 354x11. The stock speed test is a 266 strap and 11x266. We may move in the future to a 3.0GHz stock speed with a 333 strap and 9x333 settings for complete consistency, but since we are not measuring raw computer performance in our cooling benchmarking this becomes a moot point. We use the same processor in all cooling tests to ensure comparable results.

Stable Overclock (MHz)

The Alpine 7 is rated at 90 watts heat dissipation, which means it should overclock a little better than the stock Intel cooler. That is exactly what we found in the overclocking tests, with a top overclock of 3.78GHz compared to the Intel top overclock of 3.73GHz.

The Freezer 7 Pro is rated at 130 watts dissipation and it lives up to that level of performance, topping out at 3.85GHz. This does not challenge our top coolers, which can dissipate more than 150W - or even 165W in the case of the Thermalright Ultra 120 eXtreme. Nonetheless, it is very competent performance for a cooler selling for less than $25. Many other coolers we have tested that sell for much more than these two coolers do not perform as well in overclocking.

Those who expected the Alpine 7 family or Freezer 7 Pro might give our top performing coolers a run for the top will likely be disappointed. However, they shouldn't be disappointed with either cooler's overclocking performance. It is very clear Arctic Cooling knows how to design and rate their coolers for performance. Both the Alpine 7 and the Freezer 7 Pro are fairly rated and outstanding performers in their respective price classes.

Performance Scaling

Performance scaling charts for the Arctic Cooling pair use a scale with zero on the bottom and 75C on the top. Keep in mind that the lower line is the best performance in this presentation of the data - lower temperatures represent better performance.

The Alpine 7 performance scaling at idle is impressive. It significantly outperforms the Intel retail cooler, which would be the closest competitor. Surprisingly it also outperforms most of the mid-range coolers we have tested to the point where it tops out at 3.78GHz. The Freezer 7 Pro is even better, with scaling close to the top guns to its max speed of 3.85GHz.

Comparing cooling efficiency of the Arctic Coolers under load conditions to the retail HSF and other recently retested CPU coolers doesn't change the picture much. Load testing can be very revealing of a cooler's efficiency. A basically flat line, particularly form 3.73GHz upward, indicates the cooler is still in its best cooling range. A rapidly rising line indicates a cooler is nearing the end of its ability to cool efficiently. Lines that parallel the best coolers over a range of values show the coolers provide similar cooling performance.

Under load test conditions, the limited performance of both these coolers is more noticeable. Top coolers we have tested exhibit a shallower slope, where the Alpine 7 and Freezer 7 Pro both have very steep curves in load performance scaling. Results at 2.93GHz and 3.33GHz are among the best test results so far, but the Alpine 7 drops rapidly into the entry/mid performance levels at 3.73GHz and its top of 3.78GHz. Keep in mind that this is a very low-priced cooler and you can get more excited about load scaling, because performance is still significantly better than the stock cooler.

The Freezer 7 Pro fares better under load, as might be expected of a small heatpipe tower. Load performance matches the top tier until around 3.5Ghz. Load scaling then drops into the mid-range area from 3.73GHz to the top for this cooler of 3.85GHz. This is still excellent performance for a cooler in this price range.

Noise Levels Final Words
Comments Locked


View All Comments

  • vailr - Tuesday, January 29, 2008 - link

    The "photo gallery" from CES (Jan. 2008) included a photo of Arctic Cooling's "Freezer Xtreme". Any idea when that CPU cooler will be available?
    I have a screen capture of the photo, but can't locate it on Anandtech.com for posting the link.
    It's an "8-pipe cooler that only weighs 600 grams".
  • vailr - Wednesday, January 30, 2008 - link

    Found the link:
  • Cardio - Tuesday, January 29, 2008 - link

    "In fact, they are so good at stock performance that it is easy to recommend one of these coolers as a way to extend your CPU life even if you have no intention of overclocking."

    Really, has anyone ever had to extend the like of a stock cpu?
    I have never even seen a stock cpu that failed due to age. They last lots longer than their useful life.
  • teohhanhui - Tuesday, January 29, 2008 - link

    I've been using the Arctic Cooling Freezer 7 Pro for about half a year now. It's mostly quiet and cool, even with my Pentium D 830. Recently, the dust collecting in my Cooler Master Centurion 5 case has caused the CPU to overheat under 100% load(and that powered off the PC). Anyhow, I 'd definitely recommend it to anyone using a stock Intel HSF, especially for the extremely hot Pentium D's.

    I'm glad that AnandTech finally reviewed it. Why didn't you highlight the fact that the Freezer 7 Pro beats every other coolers tested so far at AnandTech at stock speed(at both idle and load, in both aspects of temp. and noise)?
  • Tuvoc - Tuesday, January 29, 2008 - link

    At long last you tested the Freezer 7 Pro !!

    These are simply outstanding coolers for the price.

    My Q6600 at 3.0GHz stays under 60C on all cores at full load per Coretemp, in total silence with fan rpm barely breaking 1,000 rpm. There is simply no need for a cooler any better for this level of CPU performance.

    My QX6700 is a different story - there the Freezer 7 Pro kept the cores at a within-spec 70C but with the fan at 2,600 rpm and with associated noise. I replaced that with a Thermalright 120 Extreme, and that CPU now runs at 3.0Ghz with core temps under 60C. At least a 10 degree drop compared to the Freezer 7 Pro.

    So, Freezer 7 Pro does have it's limitations, but for all but extreme overclocking, or the B3 core quads, it is all 99% of people will ever need.

  • Glenn - Tuesday, January 29, 2008 - link

    I have a Freezer Pro over top of a E6750 at 3.3ghz. Runs very cool and quiet. I also have the alero on the vid card and use Artic fans to cool the case. Overall a very quiet system. The only noise I get is from the Earthwatts 380 power supply which is comparativly quiet to other PS's.

    Interestingly, I used the Artic Freezer on my other system with a Q6600 Quad Core running at 3.4 prior to replacing it with a Tuniq Tower! I really spent the extra $ for the tuniq for nothing! Although the temps were down by about 3C across the board, it didn't allow for any higher overclock! Plus I pick up more noise to get those lower temps!

    My first experience with Artic came with the imported coolers for the original Slot A K7 CPUs and I have always been impressed with their engineering and quality. The keep a very high standard and I doubt I will venture far from them in the future as long as that continues!
  • imaheadcase - Tuesday, January 29, 2008 - link

    You should mention in article this is also good for OC. This is the cooler most get to overclock the 1.86ghz c2d over 3ghz.

    Not sure why you said it was good for just stock cooling..its great for OC.
  • Wesley Fink - Tuesday, January 29, 2008 - link

    We also tested and reported overclocking on page 8, and the coolers are fine for moderate overclocking. It is just that neither cooler comes close to the top overclockers we have tested. The Alpine 7 dissipates 90W, and the Freezer 7 Pro dissipates around 130W. The top Thermalright Ultra 120 eXtreme performance shows it is dissipating around 165W. Most of the top air coolers we have tested dissipate 150W or more.
  • Polynikes - Tuesday, January 29, 2008 - link

    This is a pretty old product to be reviewing... I've had my Freezer 7 for well over a year, and I'm sure it had been around a bit before that.

    That said, it is by far the best bang for the buck HSF you can get. Those giant towers may cool better, but they're huge and are hard to get in even some fairly large cases, and are much more expensive.
  • Manch - Tuesday, January 29, 2008 - link

    I have the Antec 900 case with the giganto fan up top can it be mounted to blow upwards? I wonder if the freezer pro 7 would even better? Either way

Log in

Don't have an account? Sign up now