Call of Duty 4

A surprisingly successful FPS on the PC, Call of Duty 4 also lacks any sort of in-game benchmark so we benchmark the cut scene at the beginning of the first mission. We start the frame rate counter as soon as we're in the helicopter and stop once the man in the chair gets shot.

The Radeon HD 3870 X2 does extremely well here, performing around 30% faster than NVIDIA's GeForce 8800 GTS.

Call of Duty 4 - Single Player

Call of Duty 4 - Single Player

Call of Duty 4 - Single Player

 

With 4X AA enabled, the performance gap remains about the same; at 1920 x 1200, the 3870 X2 manages a 32% lead over the 8800 GTS 512.

Call of Duty 4 - Single Player

Call of Duty 4 - Single Player

Call of Duty 4 - Single Player

Bioshock Crysis
Comments Locked

74 Comments

View All Comments

  • HilbertSpace - Monday, January 28, 2008 - link

    When giving the power consumption numbers, what is included with that? Ie. how many fans, DVD drives, HDs, etc?
  • m0mentary - Monday, January 28, 2008 - link

    I didn't see an actual noise chart in that review, but from what I understood, the 3870GX2 is louder than an 8800 SLI setup? I wonder if anyone will step in with a decent after market cooler solution. Personally I don't enjoy playing with headphones, so GPU fan noise concerns me.
  • cmdrdredd - Monday, January 28, 2008 - link

    then turn up your speakers
  • drebo - Monday, January 28, 2008 - link

    I don't know. It would have been nice to see power consumption for the 8800GT SLI setup as well as noise for all of them.

    I don't know that I buy that power consumption would scale linearly, so it'd be interesting to see the difference between the 3870 X2 and the 8800GT SLI setup.
  • Comdrpopnfresh - Monday, January 28, 2008 - link

    I'm impressed. Looking at the power consumption figures, and the gains compared to a single 3870, this is pretty good. They got some big performance gains without breaking the bank on power. How would one of these cards overclock though?
  • yehuda - Monday, January 28, 2008 - link

    No, I'm not impressed. You guys should check the isolated power consumption of a single-core 3870 card:

    http://www.xbitlabs.com/articles/video/display/rad...">http://www.xbitlabs.com/articles/video/...lay/rade...

    At idle, a single-core card draws just 18.7W (or 23W if you look at it through a 82% efficient power supply). How is it that adding a second core increases idle power draw by 41W?

    It would seem as if PowerPlay is broken.
  • erikejw - Tuesday, January 29, 2008 - link

    ATI smokes Nvidia when it comes to idle power draw.
  • Spoelie - Monday, January 28, 2008 - link

    GDDR4 consumes less power as GDDR3, given that the speed difference is not that great.
  • FITCamaro - Monday, January 28, 2008 - link

    Also you figure the extra hardware on the card itself to link the two GPUs.
  • yehuda - Tuesday, January 29, 2008 - link

    Yes, it could be that. Tech Report said the bridge chip eats 10-12 watts.

Log in

Don't have an account? Sign up now