Valve SMP Benchmarks

Our final two benchmarks are somewhat synthetic tests that Valve offered us to give us a preview of the impact of multi-core CPUs in future games. We've talked about both of these tests in our Valve Hardware Day 2006 article if you're interested in learning more about them and what they do.

Synthetic Multi-Core Performance

Synthetic Multi-Core Performance

Valve Software's Gabe Newell talked about the importance of quad core processors when he introduced us to these benchmarks. He stated that all future PCs at Valve Software would have at least four processor cores, due to the improved productivity offered. This type of performance improvement is once again the type of stuff you don't see in a lot of applications, but if you do a lot of content creation work that can leverage multi-core CPUs the performance improvements can be substantial. The 20% overclock on the Gateway system improves performance by 16% to 17% in these benchmarks, which isn't bad considering it only adds $100 to the cost of the system relative to a stock QX6700. Relative to an X6800, the overclocked QX6700 is almost twice as fast!

Gaming Performance Power and Noise
Comments Locked

26 Comments

View All Comments

  • JarredWalton - Friday, February 9, 2007 - link

    I've used a Dell XPS 410, and other than the top-end 700/710 most of the XPS cases are pretty drab as well. That said, I'm one of those people that prefers function over form, and in some instances PCs that others think look great I find to be downright gaudy. It's all up to personal preference, and the case is generally well designed in my view. Unfortunately, BTX appears to work well for cooling and noise but doesn't do much for compatibility.

    I can't say that I've had any experience with Delta Electronics beyond supporting a ton of PCs and laptops that used that brand (all Dell systems). Many PSUs failed after a few years, but that was in a warehouse environment where dust was a real problem. That they could last even two years is pretty good, and the failure rates were probably only on the order of 5% or so (compared to a motherboard failure rate of at least 15% after three years). However, I don't have any equipment to really test PSUs, so I can't speak from any standpoint other than personal experience when discussing what PSUs are good and which aren't.
  • Operandi - Friday, February 9, 2007 - link

    Dust will kill any PSU regardless of quality. Typically speaking Dell builds very reliable machines so the fact that Dell would source Delta is a testimate to their quality.
  • sprockkets - Saturday, February 10, 2007 - link

    They used to use Delta all the time, then, like HP and probably others, went to using HIPRO, and those die all the time.
  • Zebo - Friday, February 9, 2007 - link

    Dust kills, how so? How important is it to keep computer in general clean? Only time I ever clean is when I rebuild them- about every 6 months, not due to any kind of failure though. TIA
  • JarredWalton - Friday, February 9, 2007 - link

    Dust buildup on heatsinks reduces their ability to dissipate heat. I've seen a few GPUs where the fans literally melted because they got too hot! Besides that, dust can gum up the insides of the fans, causing the bearings or whatever else to stop working. I can't even guess at how many fans I've had fail over the years due to dust. So, if you live in a dusty environment, a good cleaning every 3 months probably isn't a bad idea. Most parts will last at least a year, even with neglect, but after that a lot of parts will start to fail if they aren't regularly cleaned.
  • ddogsoldier - Wednesday, November 4, 2015 - link

    so here it is nov,2015 . i have the fx530 q6600 do to my wife turning a nalgene botle full of water over own my asur pc witch was a lot newer and qiut fast with a nice turbo factory overclock when needed. had a friend who had 2 of these and new to the pc world i wanted to get one checked out with my pc guy to make sure it would run fps gmaes like warface , or planetside 2 and so on. one of the 2 was a d6600 and the other was a q6600 little did i know at the ime that one was quad and one was a duol core but i just had gotten lucky and grabbed the q6600. the pc set at my repair man shop for 4 months as i found the acer for a still didnt need the fx530 until the wife and her great spilledge of water . ya all 38 ounces . so now i have been running this q6600 for about 4 months with a
    MSI gtx560 ti twin frozer 2g/ddr5 .
    holly cow guys. with nothing over clocked i scoring on windows 7 score a
    7.1
    7.4
    7.4
    7.1
    5.9 <<hints hard drive
    i running 166 fps in warface and running faster than 89% of windows users are with a blazing boot time of 27seconds

    processor intel (R) Core (TM) 2 quad cpu Q6600 @ 2.40 GHz 2.39GHz
    ram 4.00 (3.50) usable
    hard drive 467gb with 416 gb free
    on a 64bit windows 7 system
    so i couldnt be any happier my self . all these years latter and this thing is pumping out power with no heat at all after hours and hours of hard core gaming for 8 to 12hr days '.
    i payed a total of zero dollars and no cents . i have a total of 40 and its in the video card off of craigslist and stolled it might as well say . cant find another for under 250 $ hope this is helpful to maybe a budget gamer that just might run up on one of these beast of a pc still holding its own

Log in

Don't have an account? Sign up now