dGPU Gaming Performance: 1440p

In our Ryzen 7000 series review, we saw users commenting about testing games for CPU reviews at 1440p, so we have duly obliged here. Those interested in 1440p performance with minimal image quality – particularly the esports crowd – will be glad to know that we will be testing at this resolution going forward into 2023 and beyond.

We are using DDR5-5200 memory as per the JEDEC specifications on the Ryzen 7 8700G and Ryzen 5 8600G, as well as DDR4-3200 on the Ryzen 7 5700G and Ryzen 5 5600G. The same methodology is also used for the AMD Ryzen 7000 series and Intel's 14th, 13th, and 12th Gen processors. Below are the settings we have used for each platform:

  • DDR5-5200 CL22 - Ryzen 8000G
  • DDR4-3200 CL44 - Ryzen 5000G
  • DDR5-5600B CL46 - Intel 14th & 13th Gen
  • DDR5-5200 CL44 - Ryzen 7000
  • DDR5-4800 (B) CL40 - Intel 12th Gen

Civilization VI

(a-3) Civilization VI - 1440p Min - Average FPS

(a-4) Civilization VI - 1440p Min - 95th Percentile

Borderlands 3

(c-3) Borderlands 3 - 1440p VLow - Average FPS

(c-4) Borderlands 3 - 1440p VLow - 95th Percentile

Red Dead Redemption 2

(f-3) Red Dead 2 - 1440p Min - Average FPS

(f-4) Red Dead 2 - 1440p Min - 95th Percentile

F1 2022

(g-5) F1 2022 - 1440p Ultra High - Average FPS

(g-6) F1 2022 - 1440p Ultra High - 95th Percentile

Hitman 3

(h-5) Hitman 3 - 1440p Ultra - Average FPS

(h-6) Hitman 3 - 1440p Ultra - 95th Percentile

Total War: Warhammer 3

(i-3) Total War Warhammer 3 - 1440p Ultra - Average FPS

At 1440p, performance here depends on how well the game or title is optimized for CPU cores. In games like Total War Warhammer 3 and F1 2022, the Ryzen 8000G APUs paired with a powerful discrete graphics card don't lag behind other chips. In titles such as Red Dead Redemption 2 and Borderlands 3, we can see that this isn't the case, and the AMD Phoneix port to desktop does suffer here. This is not the target market for an APU, so keep that in mind.

With STAPM limitations removed, we see nearly identical performance when testing with a discrete graphics card as we did with STAPM implemented.

dGPU Gaming Performance: 1080p dGPU Gaming Performance: 4K
Comments Locked

111 Comments

View All Comments

  • James5mith - Monday, January 29, 2024 - link

    "These limitations primarily come in highly intensive multi-threaded workloads such as rendering or encoding, where the performance of processors such as the Ryzen 7000 desktop series, but the key point is that these APUs aren't inherently designed for these tasks in mind, and users looking for more CPU grunt are almost certainly likely to opt for a higher grade processor with faster cores, more cores, and more threads. "

    That is a) a massive run-on sentence, and b) doesn't make much actual sense. For example:

    "where the performance of processors such as the Ryzen 7000 desktop series"

    Where the performance does what? Or is what? There is no coherent thought in that comma delimited side note.
  • GeoffreyA - Tuesday, January 30, 2024 - link

    The performance of the 7000 series excels at multithreading.
  • yankeeDDL - Monday, January 29, 2024 - link

    I wish there were some more remarks vs Intel's offering.
    CPU-wise Ryzen is more efficient, generally speaking. The performance seems same or slightly lower when compared with CPU that burn 400W to reach crazy boost rate. Still, that's my view.
    Comparing it only against Ryzen 5*** seems a bit limited, no?
  • meacupla - Monday, January 29, 2024 - link

    Ryzen 5000G is the primary competitor for Ryzen 8000G.
    It's next closest competition comes from the mobile segment in the form of mini-PCs.
    Intel hasn't offered an APU for its desktop socket in ages.
  • yankeeDDL - Thursday, February 1, 2024 - link

    Not correct.
    Ryzen 8000G is the only Zen4 desktop CPU on TSMC 4nm process (Ryzen 7000 is also Zen4, but on 5nm).
    So - iGPU aside - I expect the 8000G to be more efficient than the 7000. Hence, I am curious as to how it would perform against Intel and also against the 7000.
  • Grapple - Monday, January 29, 2024 - link

    Comparing against Intel’s 65W T-series processors would have made this article much more interesting.
  • FWhitTrampoline - Monday, January 29, 2024 - link

    T series is 35W and mostly for thin client Mini Desktop Business PCs but at least the T series are Socket Packaged! And Intel Made a Big mistake not releasing at least a 65W Socket Packaged Meteor Lake SKU. And Intel is very well capable of offering a socket packaged Mobile Processor because I'm still using my HP ProBook 4540s laptop with a Socket Packaged Ivy Bridge generation 3632QM processor and that laptop can get a processor update of MB replacement and reuse the same processor!
  • meacupla - Monday, January 29, 2024 - link

    I disagree. But only on processor choice.
    Ryzen 7840HS, Intel i7-13700H and i7-1370P would be my choice.
  • TheinsanegamerN - Tuesday, January 30, 2024 - link

    Given that this is a desktop chip, it'd make more sense to compare it to other desktop chips.

    Otherwise, throw an M3 and a nvidia t100 car processor while youre at it.
  • meacupla - Tuesday, January 30, 2024 - link

    Hahaha, nope.
    8000G are mobile chips using a desktop socket.

Log in

Don't have an account? Sign up now