Black & White 2 Performance

The AnandTech benchmark for Black & White 2 is a FRAPS benchmark. Between the very first tutorial land and the second land there is a pretty well rounded cut scene rendered in-game. This benchmark is indicative of real world performance in Black & White 2. We are able to see many of the commonly rendered objects in action. The most stressful part of the benchmark is a scene where hundreds of soldiers come running over a hill, which really pounds the geometry capabilities of these cards. At launch, ATI cards were severely out matched when it came to B&W2 performance because of this scene, but two patches applied to the game and quite a few Catalyst revisions later give ATI cards a much needed boost in performance over what we first saw.

A desirable average framerate for Black & White 2 is anything over 20 fps. The game does remain playable down to the 17-19 fps range, but we usually start seeing the occasional annoying hiccup during gameplay here. While this isn't always a problem as far as getting things done and playing the game, any jerkiness in frame rate degrades the overall experience.

We did test with all the options on the highest quality settings under the custom menu. Antialiasing has quite a high performance hit in this game, and is generally not worth it at high resolutions unless the game is running on a super powerhouse of a graphics card. If you're the kind of person who just must have AA enabled, you'll have to settle for a little bit lower resolution than we tend to like on reasonably priced graphics card. Black & White 2 is almost not worth playing at low resolutions without AA, depth of field, or bloom enabled. At that point, we tend to get image quality that resembles the original Black & White. While various people believe that the original was a better game, no one doubts the superiority of B&W2's amazing graphics.

Black and White 2 Performance

While spending $200 or more will earn you playable performance at up to 1920x1440 without AA under Black & White 2, the X1900 GT does fall a bit short due to its slightly higher price tag and slightly lower performance compared to the overclocked 7900 GS. As with Battlefield 2, the stock and overclocked 7900 GS parts mostly sandwich the performance of the X1900 GT. This is pretty impressive considering there is only about a 6% difference between the stock and XFX cards in the performance of most games.

Black & White 2 - No AA
 
800x600
1024x768
1280x1024
1600x1200
1920x1440
ATI Radeon X800 GTO
29.9
23.5
17.4
13
9.7
ATI Radeon X1600 XT
32.3
25.5
18.7
13.9
10.3
ATI Radeon X1800 GTO
43
34.7
26.3
20.1
15.2
ATI Radeon X1900 GT
55.7
46.5
36.4
28.9
20.9
ATI Radeon X1900 XT 256MB
64.5
55.2
40.1
30.4
24.1
ATI Radeon X1900 XT
67.3
57.5
47.2
38.3
30.7
NVIDIA GeForce 6600 GT
23.5
19.2
14.7
11.1
7.7
NVIDIA GeForce 6800 GS
30.5
25.4
19.8
15.4
11.2
NVIDIA GeForce 7600 GT
43.1
35.3
28.9
22
17.2
NVIDIA GeForce 7800 GT
45.8
38.8
31.6
25.5
20.2
NVIDIA GeForce 7900 GS
50.2
42.7
34.9
28.1
22.5
XFX GeForce 7900 GS 480M Extreme
53.3
45.3
37.1
29.9
23.9
NVIDIA GeForce 7900 GT
54.8
46.8
38.5
31.4
25.2
Battlefield 2 Performance The Elder Scrolls IV: Oblivion Performance
Comments Locked

29 Comments

View All Comments

  • sirfergy - Wednesday, September 6, 2006 - link

    Woot had this card for $139 a few weeks ago. So glad I jumped!
  • artifex - Thursday, September 7, 2006 - link

    I wish I'd bought 3 and sold them on eBay. Instead, I bought 0. :(

    http://www.woot.com/blog/BlogEntry.aspx?BlogEntryI...">woot entry

  • Spoelie - Wednesday, September 6, 2006 - link

    I dunno the situation in the US, but Europe is seeing an interesting war. We have 7900GT's costing 230€, right above there is the X1900XT 256mb at 244€ and the X1900XT 512mb at 280€, with the overclocked 7900GT's overlapping in price with the X1900XT's.

    Check it on www.alternate.de for example.

    At these prices, the X1900XT's are a pretty sweet deal, and warrant the little extra money paid over the 7900GT imho.
  • Spoelie - Wednesday, September 6, 2006 - link

    just to be clear, those are the minimum prices found, in general you have about price parity between the GT's and XT 256mb, with a few superclocked cards costing as much or more as the XT 512mb...

    Incredible value in the 200-300€/$ range imho, with cards that just months ago were in the 300-500€/$ range
  • Spacecomber - Wednesday, September 6, 2006 - link

    The concluding paragraphs on pages 4 and 5 are identical (i.e., the proper paragraph is missing for the XFX 480M Extreme vs. Stock Performance section).
  • DerekWilson - Wednesday, September 6, 2006 - link

    thanks, fixed
  • Spoelie - Wednesday, September 6, 2006 - link

    there's also a layout error in the table on page 9
  • TheLiberalTruth - Wednesday, September 6, 2006 - link

    I don't know if it's just me or what, but I can't get any page from this article after 1 to load. :\
  • peldor - Wednesday, September 6, 2006 - link

    The BFG 7600GT is down to $115 after rebate at Newegg.

Log in

Don't have an account? Sign up now