Through regular advances in process technology, AMD has also been able to reduce the power consumption of the entire X2 line on Socket-AM2.  Now all AM2 X2 parts feature an 89W TDP, whereas previously the higher model number X2s were all 110W parts.  AMD confirmed that the lower power consumption would also affect newer fabbed Socket-939 X2s, however AMD will not be changing the TDP ratings on those chips. 

On top of reducing power consumption for the Athlon 64 X2 line, Socket-AM2 will also be home to AMD's new Energy Efficient processors.  Through the same sort of TDP targeting that is used to manufacture energy efficient Opteron processors, you will now be able to pay a premium and purchase cooler running Athlon 64, X2 and Sempron AM2 processors.  The clock speeds and model numbers remain the same, but these new processors will either carry an Energy Efficient logo indicating a 65W TDP or an Energy Efficient Small Form Factor logo that indicates a 35W TDP. 

The entire list of Energy Efficient and EE SFF CPUs is listed below:

 CPU  TDP  Price Premium
AMD Athlon 64 X2 4800+ Energy Efficient 65W $671 +$26
AMD Athlon 64 X2 4600+ Energy Efficient 65W $601 +$43
AMD Athlon 64 X2 4400+ Energy Efficient 65W $514 +$44
AMD Athlon 64 X2 4200+ Energy Efficient 65W $417 +$52
AMD Athlon 64 X2 4000+ Energy Efficient 65W $353 +$25
AMD Athlon 64 X2 3800+ Energy Efficient 65W $323 +$20
AMD Athlon 64 X2 3800+ Energy Efficient Small Form Factor 35W $364 +$61
AMD Athlon 64 3500+ Energy Efficient Small Form Factor 35W $231 +$42
AMD Sempron 3400+ Energy Efficient Small Form Factor 35W $145 +$48
AMD Sempron 3200+ Energy Efficient Small Form Factor 35W $119 +$32
AMD Sempron 3000+ Energy Efficient Small Form Factor 35W $101 +$24

 

For anywhere from $20 - $60 over their 89W and 62W counterparts, you can now have 65W or 35W Energy Efficient AM2 CPUs.  The price premium is tacked onto the processors because these lower wattage parts don't yield at the same rate as the higher wattage CPUs, and thus require a higher price to make up for the decrease in yield.  But honestly, the premium on a lot of the CPUs is small enough that we can't help but recommend them (assuming the real world reduction in power is in line with AMD's reduction in TDP rating).

The Energy Efficient Small Form Factor Athlon 64 X2 3800+ at a mere 35W (less than half the TDP of the standard X2 3800+) is particularly interesting to us, but unfortunately we'll have to wait before being able to provide you all with power measurements.  While all regular AM2 CPUs are available beginning today, the new Energy Efficient models won't be available in the channel until sometime in June.  AMD did not have enough samples on hand to even provide us with one in time for publication, citing extreme OEM demand as the reason for supply being so tight.  Hopefully when these CPUs do hit the channel we won't see any sort of price gouging as they are extremely attractive. 

There are of course a long list of of new motherboards and chipsets with support for Socket-AM2, but we'll save the deep dive on both of those topics for some of our other articles in the works.  Later today you'll be able to read all about NVIDIA's new nForce 500 platform, later in the week  you'll see what ATI has to offer for AM2 and then next week we'll have our first roundup of Socket-AM2 motherboards. 

The Test

CPU: AMD Athlon 64 FX-62 (Socket-AM2)
AMD Athlon 64 FX-60 (Socket-939)
AMD Athlon 64 X2 5000+ (Socket-AM2)
AMD Athlon 64 X2 4000+ (Socket-AM2)
AMD Athlon 64 X2 3800+ (Socket-AM2)
Intel Pentium Extreme Edition 965
Intel Pentium D 960
Intel Pentium D 950
Motherboard: ASUS A8N32-SLI (Socket-939)
ASUS M2N32-SLI (Socket-AM2)
Intel D975XBX
Chipset: NVIDIA nForce4 SLI x16
NVIDIA nForce 590 SLI
Chipset Drivers: nForce 9.34 Beta
Hard Disk: Seagate 7200.9 300GB SATA
Memory: Corsair XMS2 DDR2-800 4-4-4-12 (1GB x 2)
OCZ DDR-400 2-2-2 (1GB x 2)
Video Card: NVIDIA GeForce 7900 GTX
Video Drivers: NVIDIA ForceWare 91.27 Beta
Desktop Resolution: 1280 x 1024 - 32-bit @ 60Hz
OS: Windows XP Professional SP2
The New Heatsink Tray The Question on Everyone's Mind: Is AM2 Faster?
Comments Locked

83 Comments

View All Comments

  • rADo2 - Tuesday, May 23, 2006 - link

    K8L is just a marketing, nothing else. Have you seen K8L CPU? No? AMD is about 2x slower than upcomming Conroe, so they have to spread some fud, to keep their fanboys happy...

    This is the magical performance I am speaking about, AMD cannot come even close:

    Intel Conroe @ 3.9GHz: SuperPI 1M - 12.984s
    http://www.xtremesystems.org/forums/...ad.php?t=99...">http://www.xtremesystems.org/forums/...ad.php?t=99...

    AMD FX-57 @ 4.2GHz: SuperPI 1M - 21.992s
    http://www.xtremesystems.org/forums/...d.php?t=100...">http://www.xtremesystems.org/forums/...d.php?t=100...

    I own X2 4400+ myself (it was a good choice in 6/2005), but within last few months AMD is a very bad choice, as for the price of quite obsolete singelcore AMD you can buy dualcore Intel D930 @ 65nm, and later Conroe. I think only AMD fanboys are buying AMD now, AMD has the worst price/value ratio, and Conroe will only make this gap wider.
  • Griswold - Tuesday, May 23, 2006 - link

    Oh and yea, I run superpi all day long because its such a valuable application that earns me money! :P
  • rADo2 - Tuesday, May 23, 2006 - link

    SuperPI tells A LOT about gaming performance ;)
  • mesyn191 - Wednesday, May 24, 2006 - link

    SuperPi tells you nothing except how well a CPU runs SuperPi, its not a benchmark.

    Its also about as in cache and branchless as your gonna get BTW so the performance increases you can get on it by simply scaling clockspeed are impossible as well.
  • Questar - Tuesday, May 23, 2006 - link

    SuperPi is an outlier in Conroe benchmarks.
  • Griswold - Tuesday, May 23, 2006 - link

    O rly?
  • Griswold - Tuesday, May 23, 2006 - link

    Blablabla...
  • absolsp - Tuesday, May 23, 2006 - link

    As suspected, not much of performance gain. Happy with my existing AMD setup.
  • tony215 - Wednesday, May 24, 2006 - link

    likewise, I will be sticking with my 939 venice set-up until conroe is released. Even then, I will wait for some more independent conroe test/reviews before going with Intel.
  • Locutus465 - Tuesday, May 23, 2006 - link

    After reading reviews of the new chipset offerings from nVidia and ATI, personally I'm glad I'm running an nForce 4 s393 board. Seems to me the new AM2 chipsets and boards are going to need some maturing before they get good. The new solutions were *not* deffinitivly better than what is out there for s939. In fact, nVidia's offering in my opinion was particularly lack luster in terms of actual performance (compared to the older nForce 4 platform).

Log in

Don't have an account? Sign up now